Pride Month has officially begun in Taipei, with weeks of activities and events that are to culminate in Asia’s largest annual Pride parade on Oct. 26.
Every October offers a chance to celebrate Taiwan’s commendable progress in LGBTQ+ rights and for the community to express its joy. However, it is also an opportunity to take stock of areas that still need improvement and remember that the road to equality is a long one, arduously paved by the activists who strive year-round to earn Taiwan its reputation as the most LGBT-friendly place in Asia.
This year saw wins and losses in the fight to allow transgender people to change their official gender. In May, a trans man for the first time won the right to change his designation without undergoing gender confirmation surgery after the Taipei High Administrative Court ruled in his favor. It followed a similar ruling in 2021 that gave a trans woman the right to change her legal gender without surgery.
However, another ruling by the same court in August rejected a bid by a trans woman to change her legal gender without an official diagnosis of gender dysphoria, although it also ordered her household registration office to review the application again. Instead of a medical diagnosis, the plaintiff had submitted “social evidence,” including letters and photographs to prove she was living as a woman. While not unexpected, it shows that the courts still consider gender to be a medical issue framed as a type of “dysphoria,” even if it no longer mandates surgical intervention, thereby stigmatizing diverse gender expression as an illness.
Cross-strait couples also had reason for celebration last month, when the Ministry of the Interior and Mainland Affairs Council announced that they can register their marriages in Taiwan. The law passed in 2019 legalizing same-sex marriage let cross-national couples fall through the cracks, and due to the already complicated nature of cross-strait relations, Taiwanese-Chinese couples have continued to be left out. However, after last month’s decision, these couples can submit a marriage certificate from one of the 35 countries that recognize same-sex marriage and, after submitting their documents and sitting for an interview, register their marriage in Taiwan.
The issues of surrogacy and assisted reproduction have also taken center stage this year, when the Ministry of Health and Welfare in May released draft amendments to the Assisted Reproduction Act (人工生殖法). The long-overdue changes seek to provide access to assisted reproduction care for single women and lesbian couples, who are barred from receiving treatments by the act that defines a recipient couple as “a husband and wife.” It would also legalize altruistic surrogacy, which has significant implications for gay couples who want to start a family and prefer to do so through surrogacy rather than adoption.
However, the act and amendment alike have received ample criticism for legislating assisted reproduction alongside surrogacy, which comes with a more contentious set of legal and ethical questions. Advocates fear that the more controversial aspects of legalizing surrogacy could stymie the amendment’s passage, thereby also stalling the right to access assisted reproduction technologies by single women and lesbian couples for which there is widespread support.
The comment period ended in July and the ministry hopes to forward the final draft to the Executive Yuan for approval by the end of the year, but with the criticism continuing unabated, it might take far longer — especially as it would next need to make it through a deeply divided legislature.
LGBTQ+ rights continue to march forward in Taiwan. People in the queer community, the many activists who continue to push for LGBTQ+ rights, and allies in Taiwan and those from abroad this month have a lot to celebrate, as well as a lot more work to do.
The post-Cold War belief that sovereignty, international law and economic interdependence would shield smaller states from great-power coercion is steadily eroding. Across the world, major powers are once again thinking in terms of strategic neighborhoods, buffer zones and spheres of influence. Geography is reasserting itself as a central determinant of security. For Taiwan, this shift is not merely an academic debate. It is an existential challenge. Situated just 180km off the coast of communist China, democratic Taiwan occupies a position that Beijing increasingly regards as lying within its natural sphere of influence. As China’s military power expands and its ambitions grow more
Earlier this month, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) called for the abolition of the Control Yuan, suggesting that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party caucuses in the Legislative Yuan should reject all nominees to effectively freeze the institution before pursuing a constitutional amendment to abolish it. However, KMT legislators are yet to raise a constitutional amendment proposal and KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) has made it clear that abolishing the Control Yuan is not among the party’s current priorities. Chiang, who studied law in the US, has shown his own lack of understanding of constitutional law, and
On June 11, China barred Philippine Secretary of National Defense Gilberto Teodoro Jr and his family from entering mainland China, Hong Kong or Macau, and forbade Chinese firms and citizens from conducting business with them. As an instrument, the measure is close to meaningless. Teodoro had already made clear he had no intention of setting foot in China. Its meaning lies elsewhere. This is the first time Beijing has sanctioned a sitting cabinet minister of a country it diplomatically recognizes, according to the American Enterprise Institute, and the target is the most outspoken critic of Chinese conduct in the Marcos
There are concerns that China’s new “Ethnic Unity and Progress Promotion Law,” which takes effect on Wednesday next week, targets what the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) sees as “separatist” groups in Taiwan. It is not: The CCP has its sights set on a wider, more ambitious target, aimed at consolidating its legitimacy at home. That does not mean Taiwanese would not be affected. The CCP is presenting the law as a means to “forge a collective national consciousness for the Chinese nation.” Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and his party’s “Chinese nation” includes Taiwanese. The law is best understood as
RSS