Crazy Rich Asians was a standout cinematic and commercial success, but a rare one. Asian representation on screen may have improved in recent years, but to capitalize on growing audiences, we need to be behind the cameras as well. Ignoring this market means potentially writing off billions of dollars in lost revenue, but also, importantly, neglecting genuine storylines.
The industry is losing out at a time when it can ill-afford to do so. Betting on Asian talent would help. Global cinema revenue is on track to recover from the COVID-19 downturn, but not as fast as executives would like. It is only in 2026 that sales are expected to surpass 2019 levels, which were peaking in 2018 when Crazy Rich Asians appeared.
Chinese-Canadian actor Simu Liu (劉思慕), who starred in Marvel’s Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings, is acutely aware of the mismatch between talent and plum projects. He is the studio’s first Asian superhero, and yet despite his success is struggling to break through with more meaningful roles. At the Milken Asia Summit in Singapore last month, he bemoaned the lack of available scripts for actors like him.
It was a similar refrain from actor Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊), whom I interviewed last year ahead of her Oscar win for the film Everything Everywhere All at Once. “What I’m asking for,” she told me, “is the privilege to compete.”
That this debate is still a thing in 2024, even after the success of Shogun, Squid Game and Sacred Games, tells you just how much discrimination still exists in the entertainment industry. Still, there has been progress. Research conducted by the University of Southern California’s Annenberg Inclusion Initiative, which looks at the diversity of movies in front of and behind the camera, surveyed 1,700 films between 2007 and 2023. It found that Asian representation on screen had soared to 18.4 percent from 3.4 percent.
That increase makes a real difference to audiences in the region. Another study conducted in 2023 by McKinsey & Co and Gold House, a firm investing in and amplifying the Asian diaspora, found there was a higher representation of on-screen talent when at least one or more Asian or Pacific Islanders were part of the senior creative team.
It is not just about authenticity, Bing Chen (陳冰), the chief executive of Gold House told me. It also makes business sense. “The majority of audiences are multicultural, women and people of color,” he said.
Crass stereotypes of Asian characters are costing studios money. Often, women are portrayed as sex objects, tiger moms or dragon ladies. Men on the other hand, are depicted as geeks, weak or undesirable.
The McKinsey study interviewed 1,000 Asian and Pacific Islanders in the US, and found that nearly half of them would spend more cash, and consume more content, if they saw their own experiences better reflected in stories they watched. Based on the current demographic trends, total additional spending could rise to approximately US$4 billion to US$8 billion a year by 2060.
That is a lot of dollars to leave on the table. There are concrete steps that studios and content makers can take to tap into what could be a multibillion-dollar moment. The easiest would be to elevate Asian voices at the decision-making level, when projects are first commissioned.
Increasing financial support for diverse projects and their creators would also help. This means recognizing the potential in a script that perhaps would not have big Hollywood names attached to it, as well as finding marketing funds to help boost its revenue and reach. No blockbuster is an island — the promotional dollars spent on creating a buzz around a film are often just as important as the movie itself.
It is always easier to revert to what you know, particularly in an uncertain economic environment. Making movies that studios believe are likely to bring them a guaranteed hit — Walt Disney Co’s Deadpool & Wolverine, which is part of its X-men franchise, for instance, or cute romcoms with Hollywood’s sweethearts — are all back with a vengeance. For good reason, as they are highly entertaining and worth your time. However, the stories that reflect the aspirations of more than half the world’s population deserve a chance to be told, too.
You cannot be what you cannot see.
Karishma Vaswani is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asia politics with a special focus on China. Previously, she was the BBC’s lead Asia presenter and worked for the BBC across Asia and South Asia for two decades. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
RSS