Taiwan Power Co (Taipower) has good reason to raise electricity rates — to stay afloat. The state-run utilities company is facing imminent bankruptcy, with losses of NT$421.9 billion (US$13.25 billion) as of the end of August, approaching the limit of its NT$582.9 billion assets. Taipower’s collapse would be a disaster the economy cannot afford.
The government has allocated NT$100 billion in new subsidies to absorb some of Taipower’s losses after raw material costs skyrocketed in the wake of surges in global fuel prices. Taipower did not fully pass its dramatic cost increases to customers, as it has to help keep inflation in check.
Since 2020, Taipower has raised rates by about 7.1 percent for households as of the first half of this year, compared with dramatic increases of 49 percent in South Korea, 39 percent in France and 79 percent in the UK, the company said. The rate hikes for industrial users are greater at 48 percent compared with 87 percent in South Korea, 139 percent in France and 126 percent in the UK.
The electricity rate review committee yesterday approved Taipower’s plan to raise rates 12.5 percent for heavy industrial users such as chipmaker Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co and data center operators, the fourth increase since 2022. The hikes are lower than the 14 percent proposed by Taipower. Industrial users make up about 75 percent of its total power supply revenue. For some sectors, the rate would increase only 7 percent. Those sectors include bicycle manufacturers, car component makers and chemical companies that consumed at least 5 percent less power in the first half of this year than in the same period last year. Rates were unchanged for companies that reported a 15 percent annual decline in revenue in the first half of this year and consumed 5 percent less power.
Smaller-scale businesses such as restaurants, supermarkets and households were spared the upward adjustments, to prevent higher electricity rates from inflating consumer prices, the utility said.
The latest rate hikes are certainly not enough to erase Taipower’s heavy losses, but are a crucial step toward improving its financial situation. Based on the company’s calculations, the increases would give it an additional NT$84 billion a year and trim losses by about NT$21 billion by the end of this year. The new prices are to take effect on Oct. 16.
The Taipei-based Chinese National Federation of Industries (CNFI), which represents the nation’s 159 subindustries, is concerned that higher power rates would undermine the competitiveness of traditional sectors, given that they have slimmer profit margins than chipmakers and chip designers. As local petrochemical, textile, metal and plastic producers are heavy consumers of electricity, higher electricity costs would make it difficult for them to fend off growing competition from southeast Asian rivals, the CNFI said. Price increases could fan fears of a rise in consumer prices amid ripple effects, the industry association said. Its inflation worries are overstated, as rate increases do not affect all users.
The effect on consumer prices should be manageable, as the consumer price index is to rise 2.17 percent year-on-year this year, Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics economists said. The agency said that every 1 percent increase in power prices, including on households and industries, would boost inflation by 0.12 percentage points.
As Taiwan is heavily reliant on imports of crude oil, natural gas and coal to generate power, it is extremely difficult for Taipower to keep electricity rates steady while turning a profit. To create a healthy financial structure, Taipower should be allowed to adjust electricity rates to reflect its costs to some extent, rather than become reliant on government subsidies. To reach that goal, Taipower and the government have to find the subtle balance between staying afloat and tending the nation’s inflation.
A recent report concerning a student who is suing his teacher posed the question in its headline: Does failing a student in two subjects constitute bullying? The college student in Chiayi County apparently sought NT$2 million (US$63,603) in state compensation, but a court dismissed the case. The first reaction of many might have been to ask: What has happened to students nowadays? Some say that teachers have lost their authority, while others say students are overindulged. Some even start reminiscing over the days when “whatever the teacher says goes.” However, the real issue might be overlooked if emotional reactions like that are the
When I visited Taiwan last summer, I called on the nation to use its status as a technology superpower to build superweapons. It is obvious to me as I return a year later that Taiwan is now answering that call. By 2030, Taiwan envisions a domestic drone hub, capable of producing large quantities of drones per year. The nation continues to tighten cooperation across the private sector, scientific researchers and the elected government, on creating new and innovative production avenues for defense, while efforts to become central to the “democratic supply chain” are only increasing. Anduril is seeing all of these positive
Singaporean former Prime Minister and current senior minister Lee Hsien- Loong(李顯龍) last month stood on Chinese soil and told Beijing that Singapore cooperates because of “shared interests”, not because of common “ethnic descent,” a significant statement that has upended China’s cognitive warfare tactics of “ethnic nationalism.” Along with using its military buildup and economic growth to expand its international dominance, China has long deployed ethnic politics to promote the idea that all ethnic Chinese around the world, regardless of citizenship, share a tight bond with the Chinese motherland, by which it means the regime of the People’s Republic of China (PRC)
President William Lai Ching-te’s (賴清德) May 20 second-anniversary address was not just a routine policy review; it was damage control. US President Donald Trump’s remarks — that he did not want to see anyone move toward independence and that the delivery of a major Taiwan arms package could depend on the progress of US-China relations — unsettled Taiwan’s public and created an opening for opposition parties to question whether Taiwan was being treated as a bargaining chip in Washington’s dealings with Beijing. Lai’s speech was designed to close that opening. The address covered the expected ground: sovereignty, cross-strait relations, defense spending,