The Japanese-language Nikkei Shimbun on Friday published a full-page story calling for Japan’s Liberal Democratic Party’s (LDP) leadership hopefuls to be aware of and to prepare for a potential crisis in the Taiwan Strait.
The candidates of the LDP leadership race must have a “vision” in case of a Chinese invasion in Taiwan, the article said, adding that whether the prospective president of the LDP and the future prime minister of Japan have the ability to lead the public and private sectors under this circumstance would be examined in the coming election.
The “2027 Theory” of a Taiwan contingency is becoming increasingly possible. Therefore, the incoming prime minister should be ready for a crisis during their first three years.
The article also mentioned Chinese military aircraft’s alleged intrusion into Japan’s territorial airspace for the first time, and an incident in which Chinese ballistic missiles landed in Japan’s exclusive economic zone during a military exercise in the Taiwan Strait in 2022.
There is no way for Tokyo to distance itself in such a situation. A Taiwan contingency is no longer someone else’s problem.
The article mentioned three LDP presidential candidates’ stances on this matter:
Former LDP secretary-general Shigeru Ishiba during his visit to Taiwan on Aug. 13 said he hoped Japan and Taiwan could share the same values to ensure regional deterrence.
Japanese Minister of State for Economic Security Sanae Takaichi on Aug. 31 wrote on X that Japan has to ensure its defense capability and diplomatic strength so it can nullify threats to pressure the country.
LDP Secretary-General Toshimitsu Motegi on Sept. 4 announced his candidacy, during which he said the government should not raise taxes to build up defense, and should seek other funding sources.
To avoid complicating the situation, candidates in the LDP’s presidential race tend to be silent or ambiguous about the Taiwan issue, which is sensitive in itself.
However, we can almost smell the smoke of war in the Taiwan Strait, according to the Nikkei. How could a Japanese leader deal with an all-out war without envisioning and preparing for the situation?
A tossed stone raises a thousand ripples. With the Nikkei’s story published, the LDP’s candidates would be eager to share their position over this issue under the pressure of the anti-China and pro-Taiwan public amid the escalation of the leadership race.
As the Taiwan issue would be an issue in the coming election, it would be best for Taiwan to stay out of the debate by not commenting on the issue.
Whenever Taiwan is placed under the spotlight by the Japanese media, Taiwan’s representative in Japan receives much attention.
Taiwan’s newly appointed representative to Japan, Lee Yi-yang (李逸洋), is assuming that role during this sensitive period. He would be the one whom the candidates and media outlets would try hard to win over.
President William Lai (賴清德) is a visionary for choosing Lee, one of the Neo Formosa Incident (蓬萊島事件) trio, to take up this diplomatic position. Lee is truly a gentleman, who for years has distanced himself from any power struggles in the political arena, despite being in high-ranking positions.
During a time of fierce competition and hot debate, Lee gracefully takes office in the mold of a Confucian gentleman, which Confucius (孔子) described as: “The superior man is dignified, but does not wrangle. He is sociable, but not a partisan.” The Japanese would be impressed.
Wang Hui-sheng is chief director of the Kisei Ladies’ and Children’s Hospital in Japan and a founding member of the East Asian Research Institute.
Translated by Fion Khan
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
In a stark reminder of China’s persistent territorial overreach, Pema Wangjom Thongdok, a woman from Arunachal Pradesh holding an Indian passport, was detained for 18 hours at Shanghai Pudong Airport on Nov. 24 last year. Chinese immigration officials allegedly informed her that her passport was “invalid” because she was “Chinese,” refusing to recognize her Indian citizenship and claiming Arunachal Pradesh as part of South Tibet. Officials had insisted that Thongdok, an Indian-origin UK resident traveling for a conference, was not Indian despite her valid documents. India lodged a strong diplomatic protest, summoning the Chinese charge d’affaires in Delhi and demanding
Immediately after the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) “Justice Mission” exercise at the end of last year, a question was posed to Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal regarding recent developments involving the exercises around Taiwan, and how he viewed their impact on regional peace and stability. His answer was somewhat perplexing to me as a curious student of Taiwanese affairs. “India closely follows developments across the Indo-Pacific region,” he said, adding: “We have an abiding interest in peace and stability in the region, in view of our significant trade, economic, people-to-people, and maritime interests. We urge all concerned
In the past 72 hours, US Senators Roger Wicker, Dan Sullivan and Ruben Gallego took to social media to publicly rebuke the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) over the defense budget. I understand that Taiwan’s head is on the chopping block, and the urgency of its security situation cannot be overstated. However, the comments from Wicker, Sullivan and Gallego suggest they have fallen victim to a sophisticated disinformation campaign orchestrated by an administration in Taipei that treats national security as a partisan weapon. The narrative fed to our allies claims the opposition is slashing the defense budget to kowtow to the Chinese
RSS