Vincent Gao (高志凱), vice president of the Center for China and Globalization and former interpreter for Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平) recently gave an interview with al-Jazeera’s Mehdi Hasan in which Gao appeared overwhelmed on multiple occasions.
When asked about sensitive topics such as Taiwan and Xinjiang, Gao attempted to adhere to the official position of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), but quickly succumbed to Hasan’s precise and consistent questioning, which exposed the flaws in the CCP’s positions. His views on unification with Taiwan were also widely criticized.
Throughout the interview, Gao reiterated the importance of “one China.” He said it is “not up to the people in Taiwan to decide about the ‘one China’ policy,” in response to Hasan saying that only 12 percent of Taiwanese support unification.
He also reiterated that if China unified with Taiwan, Taiwanese must pledge allegiance to the Chinese government or risk losing their rights to citizenship.
This also highlighted the CCP’s disregard for the will of Taiwanese, and its insistence on achieving its political goals through force and intimidation.
Hasan cited reports on the human rights abuses of Uighurs in Xinjiang, with credible reports showing that at least 500,000 Uighurs are being held in concentration camps.
Gao attempted to justify the large-scale detentions by saying Uighurs must toe the CCP line to be granted their freedom, but this rhetoric proved insufficient to cover up China’s increasing international isolation.
Asked whether the party would allow an interview like theirs to be aired in Beijing, Gao’s evasive response just illustrated the CCP’s suppression of free speech, which contrasts starkly with its rhetoric about “Chinese-style democracy” at international forums.
Asked about the disappearance of former Chinese minister of foreign affairs Qin Gang (秦剛), Gao said Qin was dismissed due to his involvement in corruption and hinted that he would be disappeared indefinitely, emphasizing the merciless power struggles within the CCP. His comments raise questions about the internal power structure and future direction of the party.
Gao’s responses were also an insight into the CCP’s strict control over public opinion.
Asked about freedom of speech in China, Gao said: “In China, don’t criticize our president unless you have a very positive, constructive proposal to make.”
While this might seem to be a reasonable concept at first glance, it reflects the highly restricted nature of free speech in China.
The suppression of free speech makes it difficult for the CCP to gain international recognition and weakens its global standing.
Gao’s performance not only exposed the vulnerabilities of the CCP’s propaganda on the international stage, but also reflected the propaganda’s inability to withstand public pressure.
Whether it is its attitude toward Taiwan or their dismissive response to human rights abuses in Xinjiang, the party’s contradictions in maintaining a positive or responsible image are becoming increasingly apparent.
Internationally, people are gradually waking up to Beijing’s propaganda, and coupled with internal power struggles, the party’s credibility is weakening in real time. If the CCP continues to ignore international scrutiny, its hegemonic actions would only exacerbate its diplomatic isolation, resulting in China’s international standing plummeting.
Chen Chun is an international affairs researcher.
Translated by Wang Yun-fei
Within Taiwan’s education system exists a long-standing and deep-rooted culture of falsification. In the past month, a large number of “ghost signatures” — signatures using the names of deceased people — appeared on recall petitions submitted by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) against Democratic Progressive Party legislators Rosalia Wu (吳思瑤) and Wu Pei-yi (吳沛憶). An investigation revealed a high degree of overlap between the deceased signatories and the KMT’s membership roster. It also showed that documents had been forged. However, that culture of cheating and fabrication did not just appear out of thin air — it is linked to the
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
Taiwan People’s Party Legislator-at-large Liu Shu-pin (劉書彬) asked Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) a question on Tuesday last week about President William Lai’s (賴清德) decision in March to officially define the People’s Republic of China (PRC), as governed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), as a foreign hostile force. Liu objected to Lai’s decision on two grounds. First, procedurally, suggesting that Lai did not have the right to unilaterally make that decision, and that Cho should have consulted with the Executive Yuan before he endorsed it. Second, Liu objected over national security concerns, saying that the CCP and Chinese President Xi
China’s partnership with Pakistan has long served as a key instrument in Beijing’s efforts to unsettle India. While official narratives frame the two nations’ alliance as one of economic cooperation and regional stability, the underlying strategy suggests a deliberate attempt to check India’s rise through military, economic and diplomatic maneuvering. China’s growing influence in Pakistan is deeply intertwined with its own global ambitions. The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), a flagship project of the Belt and Road Initiative, offers China direct access to the Arabian Sea, bypassing potentially vulnerable trade routes. For Pakistan, these investments provide critical infrastructure, yet they also
RSS