Perched atop Port Vila, Vanuatu’s seaside capital, sits a gleaming red and white building, gifted to the Pacific country by China last month. The new presidential palace has a coveted position in town, high on a hill and overlooking the prime minister’s office, a building which was similarly renovated thanks to a hefty Chinese donation almost a decade ago.
The multimillion-dollar complex is the latest in a long line of gifts and infrastructure projects offered to Vanuatu by Beijing, transforming several towns and villages in the small island nation of just more than 300,000 people. They include a suite of new government ministry buildings, the country’s parliament house, road construction projects on several islands, the rebuilding of a sports stadium, a new wharf and the donation of a massive convention center that often sits empty in the middle of town.
Vanuatu Minister of Finance John Salong, whose new Chinese-built ministerial building was handed over to his government with the palace last month, said the projects have been a boon for the developing country, which often struggles to pay for building works itself. The Lowy Institute estimates the presidential palace and new government buildings cost US$20 million.
“We use diplomacy as a means for us to leverage the resources we have so that we can build institutions that we need,” Salong said.
These large constructions have become visible monuments to China’s deepening influence in the region, not only as a development partner, but also as an emerging political player. Major Chinese-funded works have taken place in almost every Pacific Island country, coinciding with an expansion of China’s security and policing deals in the region and the strengthening of diplomatic ties between Beijing and Pacific governments.
Days after Vanuatu Prime Minister Charlot Salwai attended the opening of the new presidential palace, he flew to China with a delegation of officials to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). In a joint statement released after the talks, China said it welcomed Vanuatu’s “active participation” in its Belt and Road Initiative, Beijing’s multibillion dollar project to connect the world through a series of infrastructure builds.
“China has provided assistance to Vanuatu with no political strings attached,” Chinese Ambassador to Vanuatu Li Minggang (李名剛) said in an address broadcast by Chinese state media shortly after the handover of the new palace.
The Chinese embassy in Vanuatu did not respond to a request for comment.
Yet, some Pacific Islanders have voiced criticism over the proliferation of Chinese-backed infrastructure projects in their countries.
Jean Pascal Wahe, a community leader from the island of Tanna in Vanuatu, said that though a Chinese-funded road network has given his people critical access to markets, health services and the local airport, he is also concerned about the more than decade-long presence of the China Civil Engineering Construction Corp on his island.
The company, wholly owned by the Chinese government, “has now won every other sub-contract for roadworks that weren’t even part of the original road project,” Wahe said.
China’s aid expenditure in the Pacific is dwarfed by other countries, estimated to make up only 9 percent of total development spending in the region according to the Lowy Institute’s Aid Map. In contrast, the aid expenditure by Australia, who remains the region’s biggest spender by a significant margin, makes up 40 percent of total Pacific development income — equivalent to about US$15 billion as of 2021.
However, Beijing’s investment in prominent infrastructure builds, often unveiled to Pacific governments through lavish ceremonies, has skewed public opinion over the size of China’s contributions.
“Australia gives four times as much aid in the Pacific,” said Graeme Smith, a senior fellow from the Australian National University who has investigated Chinese aid and infrastructure development throughout the Pacific.
“But the perception in the Pacific, when you do these attitude surveys, people think that China is the main donor, because you have these physical symbols of their gifts,” Smith said.
Of further concern is the heavy economic burden some of China’s infrastructure projects have placed on developing Pacific countries. China is the region’s largest lender, and although many of the Pacific’s government buildings have been donated as gifts, the majority of its infrastructure builds are made possible by sizable loans from China’s Exim Bank.
“I’m scared about these loans and have doubts about how we’ll pay it back,” said Wahe, who knows the government has taken on a major loan from China to finance the works on his island.
“The project is good, but I keep reminding our leaders that in this world, there’s no such thing as a free lunch,” he said.
Tonga has this year begun the difficult process of paying back its giant US$119 million loan to China, while there are concerns Vanuatu will face debt distress as it struggles to repay China for its extensive road and other infrastructure projects.
“It might be that our debt sustainability will go from moderate to high debt distress,” Salong said.
“We have to check ourselves and make sure that it’s not just infrastructure for the sake of infrastructure, it’s infrastructure that’s going to be helping expand the economic base so that we can continue to manage the country,” he said.
As Chinese investment continues to change the landscape in many Pacific countries, other development partners are also ramping up assistance in the region. A couple of weeks after Vanuatu’s Chinese-built palace was unveiled, the US opened its embassy in Port Vila. The US recently announced US$10 million in additional funding to the region through its Pacific Islands Infrastructure Initiative.
Salong said such assistance is welcome, but his government would ultimately decide what projects would be approved.
“We make our own decisions, and we know we decide our own priorities,” he said.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
RSS