Air New Zealand Ltd’s decision to ditch its 2030 emissions target suggests more airlines would also have to confront a harsh reality: There is simply not enough sustainable fuel or new, more efficient aircraft. This double whammy has left the world’s commercial carriers, among the planet’s biggest polluters, without their two best decarbonization weapons.
Global supply of sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) would be just 0.5 percent of total fuel requirements this year, the International Air Transport Association (IATA) said.
At the same time, Boeing Co and Airbus SE cannot make jets fast enough. Boeing, under pressure from regulators, has slowed output to improve quality. Airbus is so stretched it is even turning down orders. While next-generation jets can consume 15 to 20 percent less fuel, wait times to get them delivered are years long.
Illustration: Yusha
It all means airlines such as Air New Zealand have to fly older and dirtier planes for longer, while finding it almost impossible to fill them up with clean-burning fuel. The fact that SAF can be several times more expensive than conventional jet fuel does not make it any easier for carriers to hit near-term carbon targets.
Other airlines struggling to buy enough sustainable fuel might have to follow Air New Zealand’s example, said Jack Shepherd, a sustainable fuels manager at Blunomy, an energy transition consulting company.
The fallout from such decisions would extend far beyond the next decade. If more airlines scrap interim emissions goals, fuel suppliers would be even less likely to invest in SAF production, Shepherd said.
At worst, the industry’s mid-century goal of carbon neutrality also disappears from reach, he added.
“If we’re not on track in 2030, then the 2050 goal is going to be hard to achieve,” Shepherd said. “When the general public is calling for a decarbonized world, it puts pressure on these airlines and their social license to operate.”
The widespread production of SAF has been slowed by high costs, limited feedstock and patchy policy support. Much of the small volumes available are being produced in the US and Europe.
Air New Zealand had wanted to cut carbon intensity by 28.9 percent by 2030 from a 2019 baseline, and has now begun work on a new near-term target. It still aims to hit net zero by mid-century.
The Auckland-based company might be one of the first airlines to publicly abandon an interim climate goal, but rumblings about whether aviation’s targets can be hit have been getting louder.
Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd this month said that the enormity of the task had become clear, following talks with about 50 potential suppliers.
“We have really witnessed how difficult it is for the SAF industry to take off,” Cathay sustainability general manager Grace Cheung said in an interview.
Even the industry’s 2050 net zero targets were unattainable, then-Qatar Airways CEO Akbar al-Baker said last year.
SAF, made from waste fats or agricultural feedstock, could cut emissions by almost 80 percent if it fully replaces jet kerosene, airlines said. They are betting their sustainable future on SAF, because other fuel sources such as hydrogen or electric batteries remain far from commercialization.
However, even with aviation’s commitment to SAF, IATA in June cut its estimates for total SAF production in 2030 after finding that many projects were behind schedule.
Output had to increase by a factor of 1,000 by 2050, said IATA, which represents more than 300 airlines worldwide.
Yet IATA said such a rate of increase sounded almost implausible.
The Science-Based Targets initiative, the world’s top arbiter of corporate climate goals, does not include many of the biggest airlines on its list of companies with verified net zero targets.
Airlines including International Airlines Group, owner of Iberia, Japan Airlines and British Airways, longer make the cut.
Meanwhile, decarbonizing air travel is becoming an even larger job.
Emissions from aviation are forecast to rise 82 percent by 2050 under BloombergNEF’s base case Economic Transition Scenario, which assumes nations and companies rely on technologies that are currently economic. That would see the industry’s share of global carbon dioxide pollution jump to from about 2.7 percent today to about 6.7 percent.
When it comes to cutting emissions, it is time for airlines to acknowledge the limits of what is possible, Emirates president Tim Clark said.
“We’ve got to have a grown-up conversation about what is achievable,” Clark said in an interview at the Farnborough Air Show this month. “We shouldn’t give up on it. We should just inject a sanity check.”
With assistance from Benedikt Kammel and Natasha White.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS