Air New Zealand Ltd’s decision to ditch its 2030 emissions target suggests more airlines would also have to confront a harsh reality: There is simply not enough sustainable fuel or new, more efficient aircraft. This double whammy has left the world’s commercial carriers, among the planet’s biggest polluters, without their two best decarbonization weapons.
Global supply of sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) would be just 0.5 percent of total fuel requirements this year, the International Air Transport Association (IATA) said.
At the same time, Boeing Co and Airbus SE cannot make jets fast enough. Boeing, under pressure from regulators, has slowed output to improve quality. Airbus is so stretched it is even turning down orders. While next-generation jets can consume 15 to 20 percent less fuel, wait times to get them delivered are years long.
Illustration: Yusha
It all means airlines such as Air New Zealand have to fly older and dirtier planes for longer, while finding it almost impossible to fill them up with clean-burning fuel. The fact that SAF can be several times more expensive than conventional jet fuel does not make it any easier for carriers to hit near-term carbon targets.
Other airlines struggling to buy enough sustainable fuel might have to follow Air New Zealand’s example, said Jack Shepherd, a sustainable fuels manager at Blunomy, an energy transition consulting company.
The fallout from such decisions would extend far beyond the next decade. If more airlines scrap interim emissions goals, fuel suppliers would be even less likely to invest in SAF production, Shepherd said.
At worst, the industry’s mid-century goal of carbon neutrality also disappears from reach, he added.
“If we’re not on track in 2030, then the 2050 goal is going to be hard to achieve,” Shepherd said. “When the general public is calling for a decarbonized world, it puts pressure on these airlines and their social license to operate.”
The widespread production of SAF has been slowed by high costs, limited feedstock and patchy policy support. Much of the small volumes available are being produced in the US and Europe.
Air New Zealand had wanted to cut carbon intensity by 28.9 percent by 2030 from a 2019 baseline, and has now begun work on a new near-term target. It still aims to hit net zero by mid-century.
The Auckland-based company might be one of the first airlines to publicly abandon an interim climate goal, but rumblings about whether aviation’s targets can be hit have been getting louder.
Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd this month said that the enormity of the task had become clear, following talks with about 50 potential suppliers.
“We have really witnessed how difficult it is for the SAF industry to take off,” Cathay sustainability general manager Grace Cheung said in an interview.
Even the industry’s 2050 net zero targets were unattainable, then-Qatar Airways CEO Akbar al-Baker said last year.
SAF, made from waste fats or agricultural feedstock, could cut emissions by almost 80 percent if it fully replaces jet kerosene, airlines said. They are betting their sustainable future on SAF, because other fuel sources such as hydrogen or electric batteries remain far from commercialization.
However, even with aviation’s commitment to SAF, IATA in June cut its estimates for total SAF production in 2030 after finding that many projects were behind schedule.
Output had to increase by a factor of 1,000 by 2050, said IATA, which represents more than 300 airlines worldwide.
Yet IATA said such a rate of increase sounded almost implausible.
The Science-Based Targets initiative, the world’s top arbiter of corporate climate goals, does not include many of the biggest airlines on its list of companies with verified net zero targets.
Airlines including International Airlines Group, owner of Iberia, Japan Airlines and British Airways, longer make the cut.
Meanwhile, decarbonizing air travel is becoming an even larger job.
Emissions from aviation are forecast to rise 82 percent by 2050 under BloombergNEF’s base case Economic Transition Scenario, which assumes nations and companies rely on technologies that are currently economic. That would see the industry’s share of global carbon dioxide pollution jump to from about 2.7 percent today to about 6.7 percent.
When it comes to cutting emissions, it is time for airlines to acknowledge the limits of what is possible, Emirates president Tim Clark said.
“We’ve got to have a grown-up conversation about what is achievable,” Clark said in an interview at the Farnborough Air Show this month. “We shouldn’t give up on it. We should just inject a sanity check.”
With assistance from Benedikt Kammel and Natasha White.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
In her article in Foreign Affairs, “A Perfect Storm for Taiwan in 2026?,” Yun Sun (孫韻), director of the China program at the Stimson Center in Washington, said that the US has grown indifferent to Taiwan, contending that, since it has long been the fear of US intervention — and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) inability to prevail against US forces — that has deterred China from using force against Taiwan, this perceived indifference from the US could lead China to conclude that a window of opportunity for a Taiwan invasion has opened this year. Most notably, she observes that
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
RSS