US President Joe Biden signed the Promoting a Resolution to the Tibet-China Dispute Act, also known as the Resolve Tibet Act, into law on July 12.
However, he made sure to note in his signed statement that the US recognizes Tibet (as referenced in the act) as part of the People’s Republic of China (PRC).
Tibetans throughout the world welcomed the act and celebrated it. On Thursday last week, Penpa Tsering, sikyong of the Central Tibetan Administration, also known as the Tibetan government in exile, attended a reception in Washington to thank members of the US Congress for making the act law.
The act includes major modifications to the US’ Tibetan Policy Act of 2002, all of which strengthens Tibet’s hand and position against the PRC, which was only established in 1949.
With the passage of the law, the US government officially recognizes that Tibet is not only comprised of the so-called Tibetan Autonomous Region, which was only established in 1965 by the PRC, but now includes areas that Beijing designated as part of the Tibetan Autonomous Region in 2018. This more or less states what Tibetans have been saying when it comes to Tibet territorially, which is that Tibet is a country that includes the three provinces of Amdo, Kham and U-Tsang.
They view the claims made by the PRC that Tibet has been part of China since ancient times as historically inaccurate, with the people of Tibet having the right to self-determination as they have a distinct culture and identity.
The law says that the Tibet-China dispute is unresolved and promotes substantive dialogue between the PRC, the Dalai Lama and their representative, which would also include the democratically elected leaders of the Tibetan community, which in many ways recognizes the Tibetan government in exile based in Dharamshala, India.
The law also requires the US government to combat the propagation of disinformation by the PRC about Tibet, its history, its people, its institutions and the Dalai Lama, and says that the designated US special coordinator to Tibet must work with US Department of State bureaus to implement this.
The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs denounced the US for its backing of Tibet even before the Resolve Tibet Act was signed into law.
Specifically, during the mid-June visit of US representatives Michael McCaul and Nancy Pelosi to India, the US congressional delegation met with Tibetan and Indian leaders at Dharamshala, including His Holiness the Dalai Lama and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. India displayed and demonstrated its critical role in resolving the Tibet-China dispute.
In all of its criticisms of this law, Beijing maintains that Tibet is a domestic matter. In actuality, the Tibet-China conflict is a global problem with implications for the world’s sanctity, as well as the entirety of Asia. It remains Asia’s water tower and is the third pole.
The US law on Tibet comes at a time when there are growing ties between the Tibetans and Taiwan. Major developments appear to be visible on the horizon when it comes to the Tibet-China conflict. With this chess piece being moved forward, it is now up to Beijing to respond.
Tenzing Dhamdul is a research associate at the New Delhi-based Foundation for Non-Violent Alternatives.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
RSS