Imagine if France, Taiwan or the United Arab Emirates eliminated their carbon dioxide emissions in a couple of years — and no one noticed. Something similar is happening with China’s construction sector.
Cement production has been collapsing ever since the real-estate bubble popped in 2021. Despite signs that the housing market might finally be stabilizing, the decline has accelerated this year: First-half output fell by 10.8 percent from a year earlier. That suggests the full-year total would be in the region of 1.85 billion metric tonnes — roughly 20 percent below the average 2.34 billion tonnes in the decade through 2021 and the lowest since 2009.
In climate terms, that is a hugely significant drop. Concrete is one of the most polluting materials. For every 100 tonnes of Portland cement, about 57 tonnes of carbon dioxide is released into the atmosphere, and the sector worldwide accounts for about 8 percent of emissions. China consumes half the total, so a 20 percent fall in local cement output translates into a decline in global carbon pollution of nearly 1 percent.
There is little sign of a stimulus sufficient to cause a blowout second half. Shares in major cement producers have fallen since the close of the Chinese Communist Party’s Third Plenum meeting last week, indicating that investors see little reason to expect government support. Furthermore, usage of building materials so far outstrips what we see in every other major economy that it is hard to see it ever regaining the levels seen in the past.
That 1.85 billion tonnes of likely production for this year, for instance, translates into about 1.32 tonnes per person — between three and five times higher than in other industrialized nations. China’s in-use cement stock — a measure of all the material in buildings, roads and structures — was about the same in 2013 as the roughly 15 tonnes per person in the US. Since then, it has approximately doubled. Even if output slows drastically from here, China would be left with far more concrete, in both absolute and per-capita terms, than any major nation the world has ever seen.
The country’s building boom has gone on for so long that we tend to see it as an unchanging fact of nature. That leads analysts to underestimate the extent to which its passing is changing the world as dramatically as its initiation.
If you are wondering, for instance, why the market keeps overestimating Chinese oil demand, it is worth considering the trajectory of two products refined from crude: asphalt and jet fuel.
For many years, China consumed as much of the former (used by builders in surfacing roads and roofing materials) as the latter (used in flying planes around). While jet fuel has bounced back, as people start traveling again after COVID-19, construction-exposed asphalt seems to have reset at a permanently lower level.
That is what you would expect in the aftermath of a once-in-history orgy of house building. If you are anticipating that every economic indicator would revert to the trendlines of the 2010s, you are going to be disappointed.
All roads to net zero run through China. With about one-third of the world’s carbon pollution and more than half of its annual renewable power installations, it is the biggest contributor to a warming planet and the place where we are most likely to turn a corner on centuries of emissions.
Where the cement sector leads, the rest of industry would follow. That would result in a more balanced Chinese economy, as well as a healthier planet. Cement’s decline is one burst bubble we should welcome.
David Fickling is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering climate change and energy. Previously, he worked for Bloomberg News, the Wall Street Journal and the Financial Times.
In a summer of intense political maneuvering, Taiwanese, whose democratic vibrancy is a constant rebuke to Beijing’s authoritarianism, delivered a powerful verdict not on China, but on their own political leaders. Two high-profile recall campaigns, driven by the ruling party against its opposition, collapsed in failure. It was a clear signal that after months of bitter confrontation, the Taiwanese public is demanding a shift from perpetual campaign mode to the hard work of governing. For Washington and other world capitals, this is more than a distant political drama. The stability of Taiwan is vital, as it serves as a key player
Yesterday’s recall and referendum votes garnered mixed results for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). All seven of the KMT lawmakers up for a recall survived the vote, and by a convincing margin of, on average, 35 percent agreeing versus 65 percent disagreeing. However, the referendum sponsored by the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on restarting the operation of the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County failed. Despite three times more “yes” votes than “no,” voter turnout fell short of the threshold. The nation needs energy stability, especially with the complex international security situation and significant challenges regarding
Much like the first round on July 26, Saturday’s second wave of recall elections — this time targeting seven Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers — also failed. With all 31 KMT legislators who faced recall this summer secure in their posts, the mass recall campaign has come to an end. The outcome was unsurprising. Last month’s across-the-board defeats had already dealt a heavy blow to the morale of recall advocates and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), while bolstering the confidence of the KMT and its ally the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). It seemed a foregone conclusion that recalls would falter, as
The fallout from the mass recalls and the referendum on restarting the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant continues to monopolize the news. The general consensus is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has been bloodied and found wanting, and is in need of reflection and a course correction if it is to avoid electoral defeat. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has not emerged unscathed, either, but has the opportunity of making a relatively clean break. That depends on who the party on Oct. 18 picks to replace outgoing KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫). What is certain is that, with the dust settling
RSS