Cursing, biting, blocking, kicking and grabbing... What has the Legislative Yuan become?
After the communist states in Eastern Europe collapsed at the end of the 20th century, they have walked toward liberalization. However, perhaps the difference between them and Taiwan lies in the incompleteness of the latter’s transitional justice, as the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) with a party-state ideology from the old political system remain, and their national identity is entangled with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) due to their pro-China sympathies.
The KMT and TPP seem to be intent on creating chaos.
The Legislative Yuan and Executive Yuan are different national governing bodies, and along with the Judicial Yuan, the Examination Yuan and the Control Yuan, they form a “separation of powers.”
The five-power system was originally established by Republic of China (ROC) founder Sun Yat-sen (孫逸仙), and is a tailor-made system for the ROC.
However, the KMT does not value the opportunity for normal democratic development after Taiwan’s democratization and is now abusing the party’s slim legislative majority.
The TPP is also failing to live up to public expectations as a young upstart party and echoes the KMT, which has been haunted by the party-state ideology and has failed to reform itself.
The TPP’s role is helping the wicked do wicked deeds.
If we look at the forms and rituals of Taiwan’s political system, the Executive Yuan and Legislative Yuan are counterparts: The Executive Yuan proposes policy and budget plans to the Legislative Yuan, while the Legislative Yuan questions the Executive Yuan’s officials and reviews the budgets, thus forming a “ritual relationship” in politics. As a result, the executive and legislative branches have their own powers and functions.
The Constitution of Taiwan adopts a “presidential system,” and our president is similar to a head of state with the status of a monarch, but the president is elected by the people to a term of office.
While the country is governed by the premier and members of the Cabinet, the president has the power to appoint the premier and is in charge of national defense and foreign affairs.
Regarding national governance, the Legislative Yuan’s counterpart is the Executive Yuan, in accordance with the constitution of the ROC since its establishment in China. After undergoing several constitutional amendments in Taiwan, the Constitution has become the current form.
The Constitution is made up of terms and conditions, while the executive and legislative branches, empowered by the Constitution, are the governing bodies in reality.
During the KMT government’s rule after it came to Taiwan in the mid-20th century, it adopted the Temporary Provisions for the Period of National Mobilization in Suppression of Communist Rebellion (動員勘亂時期臨時條款) and froze some of the people’s rights to enforce a dictatorial and authoritarian rule.
During the Martial Law period from 1949 to 1987, which lasted for 38 years, there were more “politicos” (政棍) than “politicians” (政客), and only a few “statesmen” (政治家) in Taiwan.
Today, some KMT legislators are still ignorant and incompetent, and several lawmakers are even local heavyweights with criminal backgrounds trying to “bleach” themselves through elections. These “new thieves” have been acting more recklessly than the “old thieves” of the past.
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Eddy Chang
In a stark reminder of China’s persistent territorial overreach, Pema Wangjom Thongdok, a woman from Arunachal Pradesh holding an Indian passport, was detained for 18 hours at Shanghai Pudong Airport on Nov. 24 last year. Chinese immigration officials allegedly informed her that her passport was “invalid” because she was “Chinese,” refusing to recognize her Indian citizenship and claiming Arunachal Pradesh as part of South Tibet. Officials had insisted that Thongdok, an Indian-origin UK resident traveling for a conference, was not Indian despite her valid documents. India lodged a strong diplomatic protest, summoning the Chinese charge d’affaires in Delhi and demanding
In the past 72 hours, US Senators Roger Wicker, Dan Sullivan and Ruben Gallego took to social media to publicly rebuke the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) over the defense budget. I understand that Taiwan’s head is on the chopping block, and the urgency of its security situation cannot be overstated. However, the comments from Wicker, Sullivan and Gallego suggest they have fallen victim to a sophisticated disinformation campaign orchestrated by an administration in Taipei that treats national security as a partisan weapon. The narrative fed to our allies claims the opposition is slashing the defense budget to kowtow to the Chinese
Immediately after the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) “Justice Mission” exercise at the end of last year, a question was posed to Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal regarding recent developments involving the exercises around Taiwan, and how he viewed their impact on regional peace and stability. His answer was somewhat perplexing to me as a curious student of Taiwanese affairs. “India closely follows developments across the Indo-Pacific region,” he said, adding: “We have an abiding interest in peace and stability in the region, in view of our significant trade, economic, people-to-people, and maritime interests. We urge all concerned
In a Taipei Times editorial published almost three years ago (“Macron goes off-piste,” April 13, 2023, page 8), French President Emmanuel Macron was criticized for comments he made immediately after meeting Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing. Macron had spoken of the need for his country to find a path on Chinese foreign policy no longer aligned with that of the US, saying that continuing to follow the US agenda would sacrifice the EU’s strategic autonomy. At the time, Macron was criticized for gifting Xi a PR coup, and the editorial said that he had been “persuaded to run
RSS