Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni’s decision not to back Ursula von der Leyen as European Commission president was driven by fear of losing right-wing grassroots supporters, but might curb her influence over EU choices, analysts said.
The European Parliament elected Von der Leyen for a second five-year term on Thursday last week to lead the bloc’s executive with support from center-right, center-left, liberal and green groups. She received 401 votes, with 284 against in a secret ballot in the 720-member chamber.
Meloni’s Brothers of Italy, part of the European Conservatives and Reformists group, revealed its decision after the vote when it said von der Leyen had shifted too far left, particularly on green pledges.
Even though von der Leyen did not need Meloni’s 24 lawmakers to win, the vote marked a shift from the prime minister’s past efforts to keep good relations with the Commission as Rome grapples with mammoth public debt.
“Meloni cares a lot about being consistent. She had said she would never vote with the left. When it became clear that her votes were not needed, she stuck to that pledge,” said Giovanni Orsina, a politics professor at Rome’s Luiss University.
However, the move dismayed many Italian commentators who said the Commission might now be less indulgent toward Italy’s public finances and its faltering attempts to spend billions of euros of EU post-COVID-19 recovery funds.
That remains to be seen, but Meloni’s first concern appeared to be fending off internal competition at home from her hard-right coalition ally, Matteo Salvini’s League party.
“She is afraid of exposing herself on the right, and this fear overwhelmed everything else,” said Francesco Galietti, head of Policy Sonar, a political risk consultancy in Rome.
Brothers of Italy is now polling at nearly 30 percent — its highest ever — while the League is about 8 percent, but Galietti pointed to volatility in Italian politics and said Meloni could not afford to alienate traditional voters.
Before moderating her positions after coming to power in 2022, Meloni was considered further to the right than Salvini, and used to advocate for Italy to leave the eurozone.
The Commission declined to comment for this story.
Asked by reporters on Thursday whether she regretted seeking Meloni’s support, Von der Leyen said only that the vote showed she had taken the right approach in assembling backers who are “pro-European, pro-Ukraine and pro-rule of law.”
Carlo Calenda, leader of centrist party Action, said in a radio interview on Friday that Meloni had preferred to be “a faction leader rather than a prime minister,” and it was “dangerous” for Italy to be in opposition in Europe.
Meloni triumphed in Italy’s European Parliament elections last month, in contrast to setbacks for French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, but since then things have not gone her way.
After being left out of a deal on the bloc’s top jobs she protested that Von der Leyen and other leaders were flouting voters’ wishes by ignoring a surge in right-wing support.
She refused to back Von der Leyen along with groups including the Patriots for Europe, a far-right alliance which includes Marine Le Pen’s French National Rally and Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban’s Fidesz.
Some analysts have said that Meloni did not want to side with the EU’s mainstream forces ahead of a possible former US president Donald Trump victory at US elections in November that could boost the bloc’s nationalists.
Yet Wolfango Piccoli, an analyst at London-based political risk consultancy Teneo, said such a strategy could backfire as Trump would likely embrace an isolationist foreign policy which would oblige Italy to strengthen European bonds.
“A plan like that would not be useful to the Italian national interest,” Piccoli added.
In an interview with Italian daily Corriere della Sera published on Saturday, Meloni said she would still be able to work with Von der Leyen and that it would be “surreal” to imagine Brussels would punish Italy when it came to deciding on Commission roles. Rome’s candidate is European Affairs Minister Raffaele Fitto.
However, her relationship with Brussels looks trickier now and Piccoli said it might be harder to have a say on issues including defense and migration, although budget procedures based on pre-established steps are less likely to be affected.
“The real question is to count in Europe,” he said.
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
RSS