China has been rapidly expanding its banking operations in the Asia-Pacific region, especially in the context of a gradual withdrawal by Western banks.
For example, after Australia’s Bendigo and Adelaide Bank announced its plan to withdraw from Nauru, Bank of China, which has opened offices across the region, signed a memorandum of understanding on cooperation with the Nauruan government. This quick reaction raises worries that China might have a broader hidden agenda.
The withdrawal of Western banks is partly due to increasingly stringent financial supervision requirements.
However, their withdrawal makes it more difficult to open US dollar-denominated bank accounts in Pacific island nations, which weakens those nations’ financial resilience. Over the past decade, correspondent banking relationships in the region have been declining twice as fast as the global average.
The US and Australia are taking steps to address this challenge. Speaking at the Pacific Banking Forum in Brisbane, Australia, which ran from July 8 to 9, Australian Assistant Treasurer Stephen Jones said that his nation wants to be the partner of choice in the Asia-Pacific region, in both banking and defense.
He said that Australia would be concerned if there were some nations operating in the region whose principal objective was advancing their own national interest rather than the interests of Pacific island nations.
US Department of the Treasury Undersecretary for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence Brian Nelson said that Washington recognizes the economic and strategic importance of the Asia-Pacific region, and is committed to deepening its engagement and cooperation with its allies and partners to bolster financial connectivity, investment and integration.
These US initiatives are no doubt aimed at countering China’s growing influence in the region.
The World Bank and the Asian Development Bank are working on improvement programs to resolve problems facing de-risking efforts in Pacific island nations. These efforts would require the cooperation and support of all stakeholders.
Taiwan, too, should play an active role. As a major economy in the Asia-Pacific region, Taiwan should use its financial strength and technical knowledge to help Pacific island nations boost their financial resilience.
Taiwan could provide them with technical support to help them build a sound financial system and work together using multilateral cooperative platforms to resist any penetration by outside forces.
Fang Kai-hung is an assistant professor at Taipei University of Maritime Technology.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
A recent piece of international news has drawn surprisingly little attention, yet it deserves far closer scrutiny. German industrial heavyweight Siemens Mobility has reportedly outmaneuvered long-entrenched Chinese competitors in Southeast Asian infrastructure to secure a strategic partnership with Vietnam’s largest private conglomerate, Vingroup. The agreement positions Siemens to participate in the construction of a high-speed rail link between Hanoi and Ha Long Bay. German media were blunt in their assessment: This was not merely a commercial win, but has symbolic significance in “reshaping geopolitical influence.” At first glance, this might look like a routine outcome of corporate bidding. However, placed in
China often describes itself as the natural leader of the global south: a power that respects sovereignty, rejects coercion and offers developing countries an alternative to Western pressure. For years, Venezuela was held up — implicitly and sometimes explicitly — as proof that this model worked. Today, Venezuela is exposing the limits of that claim. Beijing’s response to the latest crisis in Venezuela has been striking not only for its content, but for its tone. Chinese officials have abandoned their usual restrained diplomatic phrasing and adopted language that is unusually direct by Beijing’s standards. The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs described the
RSS