China has been rapidly expanding its banking operations in the Asia-Pacific region, especially in the context of a gradual withdrawal by Western banks.
For example, after Australia’s Bendigo and Adelaide Bank announced its plan to withdraw from Nauru, Bank of China, which has opened offices across the region, signed a memorandum of understanding on cooperation with the Nauruan government. This quick reaction raises worries that China might have a broader hidden agenda.
The withdrawal of Western banks is partly due to increasingly stringent financial supervision requirements.
However, their withdrawal makes it more difficult to open US dollar-denominated bank accounts in Pacific island nations, which weakens those nations’ financial resilience. Over the past decade, correspondent banking relationships in the region have been declining twice as fast as the global average.
The US and Australia are taking steps to address this challenge. Speaking at the Pacific Banking Forum in Brisbane, Australia, which ran from July 8 to 9, Australian Assistant Treasurer Stephen Jones said that his nation wants to be the partner of choice in the Asia-Pacific region, in both banking and defense.
He said that Australia would be concerned if there were some nations operating in the region whose principal objective was advancing their own national interest rather than the interests of Pacific island nations.
US Department of the Treasury Undersecretary for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence Brian Nelson said that Washington recognizes the economic and strategic importance of the Asia-Pacific region, and is committed to deepening its engagement and cooperation with its allies and partners to bolster financial connectivity, investment and integration.
These US initiatives are no doubt aimed at countering China’s growing influence in the region.
The World Bank and the Asian Development Bank are working on improvement programs to resolve problems facing de-risking efforts in Pacific island nations. These efforts would require the cooperation and support of all stakeholders.
Taiwan, too, should play an active role. As a major economy in the Asia-Pacific region, Taiwan should use its financial strength and technical knowledge to help Pacific island nations boost their financial resilience.
Taiwan could provide them with technical support to help them build a sound financial system and work together using multilateral cooperative platforms to resist any penetration by outside forces.
Fang Kai-hung is an assistant professor at Taipei University of Maritime Technology.
Translated by Julian Clegg
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taiwan and India are important partners, yet this reality is increasingly being overshadowed in current debates. At a time when Taiwan-India relations are at a crossroads, with clear potential for deeper engagement and cooperation, the labor agreement signed in February 2024 has become a source of friction. The proposal to bring in 1,000 migrant workers from India is already facing significant resistance, with a petition calling for its “indefinite suspension” garnering more than 40,000 signatures. What should have been a straightforward and practical step forward has instead become controversial. The agreement had the potential to serve as a milestone in
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic