As a relative newcomer from Vietnam, who obtained my permanent residence in Taiwan this year, I feel that what we new residents really need is not protection, but rather help to become valued talent in business, government and academia, and to be channeled into the employment and corporate markets.
The government should not shorten the length of residency required to apply for naturalization, if it applied to certain nationalities only, because that would be very unfair. Nationality is a benefit bestowed by the country concerned and it is also a sacred thing, so it should not be relaxed for a particular group, but rather for foreign nationals who have contributed to Taiwanese society and to the nation’s industries, defense and economy.
The government’s vision and strategic orientation need to be relaxed. New residents are people, just like ordinary Taiwanese, especially those who come from Southeast Asian countries. We are not less intelligent, capable or educated than anyone else. Rather than protection, the question is whether we can apply our unique strengths to contribute to Taiwan.
If enacted, the “new residents’ protection law” drafted by the Ministry of the Interior would just be a bonus measure, just like mother-tongue education. It would not be particularly helpful to the real economy and the national orientation, and it treats new residents as a disadvantaged group. The focus should be on policies that encourage new residents to learn their mother tongues, and to learn enough of them to help them find employment and develop their skills.
For example, if one of a child’s parents is Vietnamese and if the child can speak Vietnamese, could the government give them a scholarship to study in certain departments? If the child joins the military, be it in compulsory or voluntary service, could they be selected to study in intelligence units such as the Ministry of National Defense’s Military Intelligence Bureau or Political Warfare Bureau, the National Security Bureau, the Ministry of Justice Investigation Bureau or the Coast Guard Administration, where they could undergo intelligence and combat training, and learn military and intelligence-related to the Vietnamese language? Could such young people study at the Military Academy or other schools for commissioned or noncommissioned officers? Could they be classified as special talents, so that their social status can be elevated and they can be considered an honorable and practical talent? The vulnerable need protection, but we do not really need it.
Eight years ago, when many Taiwanese businesspeople moved their operations from China to Southeast Asia, they complained about the shortage of Taiwanese managers who knew anything about Southeast Asian countries.
However, the government failed to solve this problem. Although the number of Taiwanese entrepreneurs investing in Southeast Asia overtook the number investing in China in 2002, the vast majority of those Taiwanese investors remained attached to China.
This was because China already had control of ethnic Chinese entrepreneurs’ networks in the Philippines, Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand. Taiwanese entrepreneurs’ lack of knowledge about Southeast Asian countries makes them depend on guidance from those Chinese entrepreneurs.
Given this situation, dealing with the lack of a Southeast Asian talent pool would be much more beneficial to new residents than the planned “new residents’ protection law.”
Nguyen Thi Thanh Ngan is the founder of Study Vietnamese Every Day.
Translated by Julian Clegg
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission
RSS