I would like to respond to a recent article published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) [the translation of which appears on this page as “Time to use ‘Taiwan’ name in Olympics” by Tommy Lin].
I agree with the author that from now on, the country should try to use the name “Taiwan” when participating in the Olympic Games, but I also have some different views to those stated in that article.
First, the article said that Japanese politicians offered to help the country participate in the 2020 Tokyo Olympics under the name of Taiwan. However, I am a bit puzzled by this claim.
There are many Taiwan-friendly members in the Japanese House of Representatives and House of Councillors, and there are some Taiwan-friendly groups such as the Nikka Giin Kondankai (日華議員懇談會), literally the “Japanese-Chinese parliamentary club” (Why can it not be the “Japanese-Taiwanese parliamentary club”?). They often offer assistance to Taiwan.
However, the parliament is one thing, the government is another, and the latter is who sets and implements national policies. Since Japan has official diplomatic relations with China, how can Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida’s administration and previous Japanese administrations openly support Taiwan’s participation in the Olympics under the name of “Taiwan”?
The article said that then-president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), who served concurrently as the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) chairperson, not only did not support the name-changing campaign for the Tokyo Olympics, but also tried to “downplay and quash” it in every way, thus making it impossible for the Tokyo Olympics name changing referendum to pass. I believe that this is a big misunderstanding.
Many referendums were proposed at that time, and each had far-reaching consequences for Taiwanese. Perhaps the referendum that the author was concerned about did not seem to be widely discussed by the public, but this did not mean that Tsai did not attach importance to it.
As the most representative figure of Taiwan’s hawkish camp, how could she not support it, or sabotage it by “downplaying and quashing” the campaign? May I ask again, what is the concrete evidence of the alleged sabotage of the referendum?
In addition, the 2018 referendum, which asked people if they supported Taiwanese athletes competing in international sport competitions under the name of “Taiwan,” not passing might be due to the design set out by the National Referendum Act (公民投票法), or that people were neither particularly enthusiastic nor disapproving of the name change.
Instead of accusing Tsai of sabotage, do not forget that before the referendum a group of Taiwanese athletes stood together and shouted: “Names don’t matter, We wanna compete!” and “Politics is politics, sports is sports!” Was the Taiwanese athletes’ call not the straw that broke the camel’s back on this issue?
Hung Yu-jui is a translator and Japanese-language teacher.
Translated by Eddy Chang
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi on Monday announced that she would dissolve parliament on Friday. Although the snap election on Feb. 8 might appear to be a domestic affair, it would have real implications for Taiwan and regional security. Whether the Takaichi-led coalition can advance a stronger security policy lies in not just gaining enough seats in parliament to pass legislation, but also in a public mandate to push forward reforms to upgrade the Japanese military. As one of Taiwan’s closest neighbors, a boost in Japan’s defense capabilities would serve as a strong deterrent to China in acting unilaterally in the
RSS