Chen Mu-yi (陳慕義), who won the Golden Horse Award for Best Supporting Actor last year, wrote on the messaging app Line: “There is no need for further comment. I am clear on what I have done, and most importantly, I know my situation and where I stand. After the Golden Horse Awards, I have not received any more job opportunities. This is an unforeseen and unique circumstance, so I will just smile and let it be.”
Chen’s early involvement as a founding member of the Taiwan Independence Party, coupled with his strong Taiwanese consciousness, has unfortunately impeded his career within the pro-blue camp and pro-China film industry.
National Tsing Hua University (NTHU) invited Brigitte Lin (林青霞) to be the keynote speaker for this year’s graduation ceremony. If the university wished to invite an actor to share insights on life and art, Chen was the obvious choice. As a symbol of Taiwanese identity within the film industry, he deserves the utmost respect.
Lin missed the mark entirely with her speech. It lacked substance and meaning, and was filled with about 60 egoistic “I’s.” It was as if she was trying to show off to mummy that she was on the big stage today.
By comparison, actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) delivered an enlightening and moving speech at Harvard University last year. It was on an entirely different level to Lin’s. This is how it should be done.
NTHU has only responded to external criticisms by issuing a statement calling for “tolerance of cultural pluralism.”
If the graduates cannot tell that the speech is just “empty corrupt talk,” and if lecturers lack the courage to speak up, does NTHU truly foster a culture of critical thinking and a diverse cultural environment as it claims to do?
Lin is pro-China and has repeatedly avoided the question of Taiwanese identity. In her acceptance speech for the Golden Horse Lifetime Achievement Award, Lin referenced “the place where she grew up” or “here” to talk about Taiwan, but not once did she say “Taiwan.”
She also stayed silent on the Xinjiang cotton controversy in 2021, a clear indicator of her political leanings.
She was born and raised in Taiwan, and rose to fame here, and even if she married a Hong Konger and moved there, is she not still Taiwanese? Sadly, Taiwanese identity and human rights issues seem to mean nothing to her.
China is hostile to Taiwan, and NTHU’s decision to invite an actress with a dubious sense of identity is perplexing. It makes one wonder about their true principles and allegiances.
Films and literary works of political content, addressing transitional justice and amplifying marginalized voices, have long been covertly suppressed and underfunded. A pro-blue and pro-China elite circle has consistently called the shots, monopolizing control over resources.
Lin’s recipience of the Lifetime Achievement Award despite her mediocre performances is a wake-up call. It is crucial to recognize and celebrate artists like Chen who defend Taiwanese identity.
Those who select keynote speakers need to do a better job of inviting those with a perspective to protect Taiwan.
Although it might seem like a small step, the collective determination to defend the nation and strengthen Taiwanese national consciousness begins in the academic and cultural fields. Higher education, in particular, should shoulder this responsibility.
To this end, the ministries of culture and education must continue to push for greater investment in a reshaped vision that places Taiwanese consciousness at the center.
Chu Meng-hsiang is former deputy secretary-general of the Lee Teng-hui Foundation.
Translated by Gabrielle Killick
With the Year of the Snake reaching its conclusion on Monday next week, now is an opportune moment to reflect on the past year — a year marked by institutional strain and national resilience. For Taiwan, the Year of the Snake was a composite of political friction, economic momentum, social unease and strategic consolidation. In the political sphere, it was defined less by legislative productivity and more by partisan confrontation. The mass recall movement sought to remove 31 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators following the passage of controversial bills that expanded legislative powers and imposed sweeping budget cuts. While the effort
There is a story in India about a boy called Prahlad who was an ardent worshipper of Lord Narayana, whom his father considered an enemy. His son’s devotion vexed the father to the extent that he asked his sister, Holika, who could not be burned by fire, to sit with the boy in her lap and burn him to death. Prahlad knew about this evil plan, but sat in his aunt’s lap anyway. His faith won, as he remained unscathed by the fire, while his aunt was devoured by the flames. In some small way, Prahlad reminds me of Taiwan
When Hong Kong’s High Court sentenced newspaper owner Jimmy Lai (黎智英) to 20 years in prison this week, officials declared that his “heinous crimes” had long poisoned society and that his punishment represented justice restored. In their telling, Lai is the mastermind of Hong Kong’s unrest — the architect of a vast conspiracy that manipulated an otherwise contented population into defiance. They imply that removing him would lead to the return of stability. It is a politically convenient narrative — and a profoundly false one. Lai did not radicalize Hong Kong. He belonged to the same generation that fled from the Chinese
To our readers: Due to the Lunar New Year holiday, from Sunday, Feb. 15, through Sunday, Feb. 22, the Taipei Times will have a reduced format without our regular editorials and opinion pieces. From Mondy to Thursday the paper will not be delivered to subscribers, but will be available for purchase at convenience stores. Subscribers will receive the editions they missed once normal distribution resumes on Friday, Feb. 20. The paper returns to its usual format on Monday, Feb. 23, when our regular editorials and opinion pieces will also be resumed.
RSS