Chen Mu-yi (陳慕義), who won the Golden Horse Award for Best Supporting Actor last year, wrote on the messaging app Line: “There is no need for further comment. I am clear on what I have done, and most importantly, I know my situation and where I stand. After the Golden Horse Awards, I have not received any more job opportunities. This is an unforeseen and unique circumstance, so I will just smile and let it be.”
Chen’s early involvement as a founding member of the Taiwan Independence Party, coupled with his strong Taiwanese consciousness, has unfortunately impeded his career within the pro-blue camp and pro-China film industry.
National Tsing Hua University (NTHU) invited Brigitte Lin (林青霞) to be the keynote speaker for this year’s graduation ceremony. If the university wished to invite an actor to share insights on life and art, Chen was the obvious choice. As a symbol of Taiwanese identity within the film industry, he deserves the utmost respect.
Lin missed the mark entirely with her speech. It lacked substance and meaning, and was filled with about 60 egoistic “I’s.” It was as if she was trying to show off to mummy that she was on the big stage today.
By comparison, actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) delivered an enlightening and moving speech at Harvard University last year. It was on an entirely different level to Lin’s. This is how it should be done.
NTHU has only responded to external criticisms by issuing a statement calling for “tolerance of cultural pluralism.”
If the graduates cannot tell that the speech is just “empty corrupt talk,” and if lecturers lack the courage to speak up, does NTHU truly foster a culture of critical thinking and a diverse cultural environment as it claims to do?
Lin is pro-China and has repeatedly avoided the question of Taiwanese identity. In her acceptance speech for the Golden Horse Lifetime Achievement Award, Lin referenced “the place where she grew up” or “here” to talk about Taiwan, but not once did she say “Taiwan.”
She also stayed silent on the Xinjiang cotton controversy in 2021, a clear indicator of her political leanings.
She was born and raised in Taiwan, and rose to fame here, and even if she married a Hong Konger and moved there, is she not still Taiwanese? Sadly, Taiwanese identity and human rights issues seem to mean nothing to her.
China is hostile to Taiwan, and NTHU’s decision to invite an actress with a dubious sense of identity is perplexing. It makes one wonder about their true principles and allegiances.
Films and literary works of political content, addressing transitional justice and amplifying marginalized voices, have long been covertly suppressed and underfunded. A pro-blue and pro-China elite circle has consistently called the shots, monopolizing control over resources.
Lin’s recipience of the Lifetime Achievement Award despite her mediocre performances is a wake-up call. It is crucial to recognize and celebrate artists like Chen who defend Taiwanese identity.
Those who select keynote speakers need to do a better job of inviting those with a perspective to protect Taiwan.
Although it might seem like a small step, the collective determination to defend the nation and strengthen Taiwanese national consciousness begins in the academic and cultural fields. Higher education, in particular, should shoulder this responsibility.
To this end, the ministries of culture and education must continue to push for greater investment in a reshaped vision that places Taiwanese consciousness at the center.
Chu Meng-hsiang is former deputy secretary-general of the Lee Teng-hui Foundation.
Translated by Gabrielle Killick
The White House’s decision to take a 9.9 percent stake in Intel Corp is looking like very shrewd business indeed. Since the government bought in at US$20.47 a share last August, the US chipmaker’s surging stock price has delivered the US a US$43 billion return. One of the reasons the investment has so far proved so sound is that the White House has made sure of it. According to The Wall Street Journal, Howard personally pushed deals on Intel’s behalf with some of the most lucrative clients imaginable. They include Nvidia Corp, the company at the heart of the AI
KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun’s (鄭麗文) recent visit to Beijing and her upcoming visit to Washington will serve as a high-level test of her diplomatic mettle. In Beijing, Cheng was received with symbolic gestures, a warm reception, and high-level access. In Washington, she will receive far less pomp and far sharper questions about the KMT’s vision for the future of Taiwan. Her challenge will be to persuade Washington that the KMT’s engagement with China can coexist with strong deterrence. Cheng’s April 7-12 visit to mainland China coincided with an intense period of conflict in Iran. Despite the strategic significance of Cheng’s trip,
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has sent the vast Asian chemicals industry into a tailspin. Deprived of the likes of Qatari natural gas and Saudi Arabian oil, the region’s fertilizer and plastics plants are slowing production or even shutting down. Everywhere except China, that is. In petrochemicals, China is unique. As well as a traditional industry that uses oil and gas as feedstock, it has parallel output that relies on its abundant domestic coal. Unsurprisingly, India and other regional powers want to copy and paste the Chinese method. This would not be easy — or climate friendly. The
Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto says he knows how to fix the problems facing Indonesia. Yet his economic mismanagement and authoritarian tendencies are steering the nation toward a familiar mix of currency instability and political chaos. The world’s fourth-most populous nation risks reversing the hard-won democratic and business reforms that came after the Asian Financial Crisis in 1997. At that time, the rupiah collapsed and the political upheaval that followed forced former president Haji Mohamed Suharto from power. Prabowo’s administration is ignoring similar warning signs. That disconnect was apparent in a national address on Wednesday, when Prabowo projected the swagger that has