What is Italian Prime Minister Georgia Meloni? If you believe in the importance of economic stability and the core values of democracy, is she an asset or a threat?
This is a tough breed of question to answer, other than with hindsight. In the early 2000s, I would often be asked if I thought Russia’s new president, Vladimir Putin, was just restoring order after the chaos of the 1990s to then build democracy or was planning for autocracy.
I would say I could not be sure, but to remember what Putin was — a career KGB agent who loyally served the Soviet Union — because that would be decisive at each major fork he met in the road.
Illustration: Mountain People
Likewise, Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan is a life-long Islamist whose nickname at school had been hoca (religious teacher). I first met him at Davos, after his Justice and Development Party had won election in 2002, pledging to uphold Turkey’s secular constitution. He was there to persuade Western leaders and investors they had nothing to fear. He largely succeeded.
Many secular Turks were skeptical, but as with Putin in the early 2000s, I suspect even Erdogan did not know at the start where his path would lead.
The world quickly changed around these men. The need to bow to a seemingly unchallengeable West eroded. Both became politically stronger. Both were great stewards of the economy until they were not.
When their interests clashed with those of the US and Europe, and liberal voters turned against them at home, their DNA kicked in. Putin built a police state. Erdogan created an increasingly authoritarian and Islamist one.
So, what of Meloni, the political enigma of our day? Her party, Brothers of Italy, has neofascist roots and a youth wing that still manages to get caught on camera praising Benito Mussolini and making Nazi salutes.
Yet their leader, a fan of Il Duce in her youth, has long since moved toward the respectable center. In office, she has proved deftly cautious, often behaving less like a populist from the ultra-right than an old-school conservative. This is clearly a very capable politician, with a reputation for taking detailed notes and reading her briefs. She is remarkably unlike former US president Donald Trump.
Meloni rode the culture wars to power, filling a vacuum as first the traditional centrist parties and then the left-wing populist Five-Star movement struggled to deliver solutions to Italy’s most pressing questions: How to restore economic growth and how to address the momentous challenges represented by the combination of falling native birthrates and rising migration.
Meloni began her time in office by reassuring other EU leaders she would not be another disruptor, like Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban. She even brought a cake to her first summit.
On China, she ended Italy’s anomalous position as the only G7 member to have joined Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) Belt and Road Initiative. To Ukraine, she has proved a staunch ally, appearing to have no time for Putin — in contrast not just to much of her own party, but of her electorate, too. Some of her pro-Ukraine speeches in the Italian parliament have been barnstormers.
Moreover, Meloni is leaning in on some of the tougher questions surrounding the war. On June 13, she used her presidency of the G7 to drive through a deal on using frozen Russian assets to secure a US$50 billion loan for Ukraine.
Italy is also about to send Kyiv Storm Shadow cruise missiles, Italian media have reported.
So could Meloni be building a non-populist model for organizing Europe’s far-right? I am not sure and, perhaps not even she knows.
To be clear, I do not like her views on abortion, LGBTQ+ rights or immigration, but these are for the Italian electorate to decide. If Meloni could help channel Europe’s hard-right away from populist stances on security, the economy and democratic rights and freedoms, she would deserve applause.
For now, at least, it is clear Meloni has understood that Italy, with its geography, 140 percent debt-to-GDP ratio and near-stagnant economy has no rational alternative to EU funding and collective security.
She recently excluded Orban from the European Parliament faction that Brothers of Italy belongs to, the European Conservatives and Reformists. So, in theory, the far-right now has two potential leaders and styles to choose from. Equally clear, from Meloni’s furious reaction to being excluded from negotiations on top EU jobs this week, is that she expects in return to be treated as a top-table player, not an outcast.
She is surely right. The continent’s centrist party leaders were arrogant and tactically myopic to snub her. Meloni would never be a Putin or Erdogan, just as Italy would never be Russia or Turkey.
Yet she could change in ways that would be damaging for Europe. Meloni’s government is already accused of encroaching on media freedoms.
She is also trying to drive through constitutional changes that would see the prime minister directly elected and their supporting parties guaranteed 55 percent of parliament seats.
Italy’s democratic machinery needs reform, but this is a disturbing proposal that would consolidate power in the hands of one person, who no doubt Meloni intends to be herself.
Her luck on the economy also appears to be running out, with debt servicing costs on the rise and some tough spending choices on the horizon as a result. Who know how she will handle all this, but she comes from the big spending interventionist wing of conservatism.
Neither is it clear how cautious she might feel she still needs to be after next month, should Marine le Pen’s far-right National Rally party win big in France’s snap election.
When Meloni faces those big forks in the road, I expect her core instincts to win over in ways that make her seem less benign.
Yet it would be good to be wrong and Europe’s leaders should do all they can not to precipitate such a moment. They should give her outreach the respect it deserves, keep her inside the tent and in competition with Orban.
Marc Champion is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Europe, Russia and the Middle East. He was previously Istanbul bureau chief for the Wall Street Journal. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
RSS