On Friday, Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators denied a Cabinet request to reconsider a set of controversial bills. The amendments are set to go into effect, expanding the legislature’s power of oversight.
TPP Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) is largely to blame for this.
In the past few days, the former Taipei mayor has been particularly anxious, following a recent poll revealing that support for the TPP has plummeted.
From an initial average of 22 to 25 percent six months before the January elections, support for the TPP has dwindled to 14.3 percent — a significant drop that has cost Ko more than 1.6 million supporters. It is evident that his chances of becoming president in 2028 are slim at best.
Ko knows full well that the party’s slide in popularity is the consequence of TPP caucus whip Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) leading the party by the nose.
The collaboration between the TPP and the KMT in the past few months has led to nothing but chaos, resulting in unconstitutional actions and the introduction of bills infringing on people’s rights.
In response, people across Taiwan, including young people and centrist voters, have joined together in protest, forming the “Bluebird movement.” They are calling for the controversial bills to be sent back for review and for KMT legislators to be removed from office.
Lawyers and legal experts have also been at the forefront of the movement. When the amendments were initially passed on May 28, more than 100 Taiwanese legal experts, alongside overseas academics and the director of the American Institute in Taiwan, signed a counterpetition calling for the bills to be sent back for review.
They say that the bills jeopardize the proper functioning of the government and compromise fundamental rights.
Ko usually has a strong sense of what is going on and an astute understanding of the political climate. Yet, by failing to push TPP legislators to vote for reconsideration, he has missed an opportunity to regain lost support.
The terms of the new parliamentary amendments are too ambiguous and ill-conceived. The bills would give legislators the authority to subpoena people at any time to be questioned. Individuals would be required to provide personal information or even business secrets, lest they wish to be fined and sent to the Judicial Yuan for further investigation and prosecution.
Ko and Huang must understand: If Huang has only managed to rack up a poor 13 percent support in a recent New Taipei City 2026 mayoral election poll, it is because of the shady nature of these bills.
In this uneasy climate, how can Huang ever expect his support to pick up? Even the KMT can no longer consider him as candidate for New Taipei City mayor.
As a man of law, Huang must cease to deny the criticism of the legal community and face the ugly truth that people no longer trust his judgement. He has made his bed and must now lie in it.
For his own part and for the sake of his political career, Ko should consider revoking Huang’s party membership. If he were to lead the seven TPP legislators to correct their course, Ko might still have a chance for a political comeback. However, after Friday morning’s debacle, hope is bleak.
Michael Lin is a retired diplomat, formerly posted in the US.
Translated by Gabrielle Killick
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
RSS