This year marks the centennial of the Republic of China (ROC) Military Academy, founded on June 16, 1924, in Guangzhou, China. Originally called the Whampoa Military Academy, as it was founded in the city’s Huangpu area, the name is still salient for many on both sides of the Taiwan Strait. The “spirit of Whampoa” is still used as shorthand for patriotism, harkening back to a time of united struggle against warlordism and Japanese invaders based on the republican philosophies of ROC founder Sun Yat-sen (孫逸仙).
At the time of the academy’s founding, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) was in a tense detente with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), as both factions sought to unite a splintered China through the Northern Expedition. In an interesting quirk of history, its primary financial backer was the Soviet Union, which sent officers to oversee the training of cadets who would become leaders of the ROC and the People’s Republic of China, molded in the Leninist image.
Yet although they trained together, the alliance was doomed to failure from the beginning. Before the Northern Expedition was even finished, Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and his allies purged the communists from their ranks. The academy was relocated to Nanjing and then to Chengdu during the Second Sino-Japanese War, which saw a second, equally doomed united front between the KMT and the CCP, before the former eventually retreated to Taiwan at the end of the Chinese Civil War. The academy ended up in Kaohsiung’s Fongshan District (鳳山), where it remains today.
This complex history lends itself to free interpretation. As the birthplace of both the ROC military and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army, both sides of the Strait have reason to commemorate the academy’s centennial. Yet free interpretation also lends itself to propaganda.
Both sides of the Strait organized events to mark the occasion. In Kaohsiung, President William Lai (賴清德) on Sunday presided over a ceremony featuring marching cadets dressed in uniforms from each of the academy’s iterations. In China, Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Wang Huning (王滬寧) spoke at the main event in Beijing on Monday, while other celebrations were held across the country, including the opening of an exhibition on the original site in Huangpu. Both governments even released stamps to mark the occasion.
Based on this history, the academy represents a China whose fates are intertwined. The narrative is convenient for Beijing, which spends every Whampoa anniversary highlighting these ties and inviting former Taiwanese military officers to the event to keep the link alive.
Although Beijing made much ado about drawing more than 3,000 retired Taiwanese officers this year, Taipei estimated that fewer than 100 were to attend the events organized by the Chinese United Front Work Department. Based on its itinerary, the department appears to be emphasizing camaraderie across the Strait based on a shared animosity toward Japan.
Yet if anything is clear from these dueling centennials, it is that a lot can happen in 100 years. The days of the KMT and the CCP (reluctantly) fighting side-by-side against warlords and Japanese invaders feels like ancient history, and rightfully so. It has vanishingly little bearing on the China and Taiwan of today, whose service members do not remember the “Whampoa spirit.” The only lesson that remains painfully salient is the deadly rivalry between the parties, their shared foes long since faded into the annals of history.
Now that the centennial has come and gone, it is time to move on from this antiquated affinity with Chinese history and foster a “Taiwan spirit” amongst the nation’s finest.
I came to Taiwan to pursue my degree thinking that Taiwanese are “friendly,” but I was welcomed by Taiwanese classmates laughing at my friend’s name, Maria (瑪莉亞). At the time, I could not understand why they were mocking the name of Jesus’ mother. Later, I learned that “Maria” had become a stereotype — a shorthand for Filipino migrant workers. That was because many Filipino women in Taiwan, especially those who became house helpers, happen to have that name. With the rapidly increasing number of foreigners coming to Taiwan to work or study, more Taiwanese are interacting, socializing and forming relationships with
Chinese social media influencer “Yaya in Taiwan” (亞亞在台灣), whose real name is Liu Zhenya (劉振亞), made statements advocating for “reunifying Taiwan [with China] through military force.” After verifying that Liu did indeed make such statements, the National Immigration Agency revoked her dependency-based residency permit. She must now either leave the country voluntarily or be deported. Operating your own page and becoming an influencer require a certain amount of support and user traffic. You must successfully gain approval for your views and attract an audience. Although Liu must leave the country, I cannot help but wonder how many more “Yayas” are still
Earlier signs suggest that US President Donald Trump’s policy on Taiwan is set to move in a more resolute direction, as his administration begins to take a tougher approach toward America’s main challenger at the global level, China. Despite its deepening economic woes, China continues to flex its muscles, including conducting provocative military drills off Taiwan, Australia and Vietnam recently. A recent Trump-signed memorandum on America’s investment policy was more about the China threat than about anything else. Singling out the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as a foreign adversary directing investments in American companies to obtain cutting-edge technologies, it said
The recent termination of Tibetan-language broadcasts by Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) is a significant setback for Tibetans both in Tibet and across the global diaspora. The broadcasts have long served as a vital lifeline, providing uncensored news, cultural preservation and a sense of connection for a community often isolated by geopolitical realities. For Tibetans living under Chinese rule, access to independent information is severely restricted. The Chinese government tightly controls media and censors content that challenges its narrative. VOA and RFA broadcasts have been among the few sources of uncensored news available to Tibetans, offering insights
RSS