This year marks the centennial of the Republic of China (ROC) Military Academy, founded on June 16, 1924, in Guangzhou, China. Originally called the Whampoa Military Academy, as it was founded in the city’s Huangpu area, the name is still salient for many on both sides of the Taiwan Strait. The “spirit of Whampoa” is still used as shorthand for patriotism, harkening back to a time of united struggle against warlordism and Japanese invaders based on the republican philosophies of ROC founder Sun Yat-sen (孫逸仙).
At the time of the academy’s founding, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) was in a tense detente with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), as both factions sought to unite a splintered China through the Northern Expedition. In an interesting quirk of history, its primary financial backer was the Soviet Union, which sent officers to oversee the training of cadets who would become leaders of the ROC and the People’s Republic of China, molded in the Leninist image.
Yet although they trained together, the alliance was doomed to failure from the beginning. Before the Northern Expedition was even finished, Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and his allies purged the communists from their ranks. The academy was relocated to Nanjing and then to Chengdu during the Second Sino-Japanese War, which saw a second, equally doomed united front between the KMT and the CCP, before the former eventually retreated to Taiwan at the end of the Chinese Civil War. The academy ended up in Kaohsiung’s Fongshan District (鳳山), where it remains today.
This complex history lends itself to free interpretation. As the birthplace of both the ROC military and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army, both sides of the Strait have reason to commemorate the academy’s centennial. Yet free interpretation also lends itself to propaganda.
Both sides of the Strait organized events to mark the occasion. In Kaohsiung, President William Lai (賴清德) on Sunday presided over a ceremony featuring marching cadets dressed in uniforms from each of the academy’s iterations. In China, Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Wang Huning (王滬寧) spoke at the main event in Beijing on Monday, while other celebrations were held across the country, including the opening of an exhibition on the original site in Huangpu. Both governments even released stamps to mark the occasion.
Based on this history, the academy represents a China whose fates are intertwined. The narrative is convenient for Beijing, which spends every Whampoa anniversary highlighting these ties and inviting former Taiwanese military officers to the event to keep the link alive.
Although Beijing made much ado about drawing more than 3,000 retired Taiwanese officers this year, Taipei estimated that fewer than 100 were to attend the events organized by the Chinese United Front Work Department. Based on its itinerary, the department appears to be emphasizing camaraderie across the Strait based on a shared animosity toward Japan.
Yet if anything is clear from these dueling centennials, it is that a lot can happen in 100 years. The days of the KMT and the CCP (reluctantly) fighting side-by-side against warlords and Japanese invaders feels like ancient history, and rightfully so. It has vanishingly little bearing on the China and Taiwan of today, whose service members do not remember the “Whampoa spirit.” The only lesson that remains painfully salient is the deadly rivalry between the parties, their shared foes long since faded into the annals of history.
Now that the centennial has come and gone, it is time to move on from this antiquated affinity with Chinese history and foster a “Taiwan spirit” amongst the nation’s finest.
Taiwan’s higher education system is facing an existential crisis. As the demographic drop-off continues to empty classrooms, universities across the island are locked in a desperate battle for survival, international student recruitment and crucial Ministry of Education funding. To win this battle, institutions have turned to what seems like an objective measure of quality: global university rankings. Unfortunately, this chase is a costly illusion, and taxpayers are footing the bill. In the past few years, the goalposts have shifted from pure research output to “sustainability” and “societal impact,” largely driven by commercial metrics such as the UK-based Times Higher Education (THE) Impact
History might remember 2026, not 2022, as the year artificial intelligence (AI) truly changed everything. ChatGPT’s launch was a product moment. What is happening now is an anthropological moment: AI is no longer merely answering questions. It is now taking initiative and learning from others to get things done, behaving less like software and more like a colleague. The economic consequence is the rise of the one-person company — a structure anticipated in the 2024 book The Choices Amid Great Changes, which I coauthored. The real target of AI is not labor. It is hierarchy. When AI sharply reduces the cost
The inter-Korean relationship, long defined by national division, offers the clearest mirror within East Asia for cross-strait relations. Yet even there, reunification language is breaking down. The South Korean government disclosed on Wednesday last week that North Korea’s constitutional revision in March had deleted references to reunification and added a territorial clause defining its border with South Korea. South Korea is also seriously debating whether national reunification with North Korea is still necessary. On April 27, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marked the eighth anniversary of the Panmunjom Declaration, the 2018 inter-Korean agreement in which the two Koreas pledged to
I wrote this before US President Donald Trump embarked on his uneventful state visit to China on Thursday. So, I shall confine my observations to the joint US-Philippine military exercise of April 20 through May 8, known collectively as “Balikatan 2026.” This year’s Balikatan was notable for its “firsts.” First, it was conducted primarily with Taiwan in mind, not the Philippines or even the South China Sea. It also showed that in the Pacific, America’s alliance network is still robust. Allies are enthusiastic about America’s renewed leadership in the region. Nine decades ago, in 1936, America had neither military strength