I once described independent Legislator May Chin (高金素梅) as a “well-paid spokesperson of dictator [Chinese President] Xi Jinping (習近平)” — a judgement some of my friends claimed to be arbitrary.
However, when it comes to character assessment, I follow Confucius’ (孔子) precepts: “Watch what they do and observe how they do it. How can they conceal their true self?”
During a questioning session in the Legislative Yuan, my suspicions were confirmed when Chin unabashedly referred to the Chinese president as “our Xi Jinping.”
While UK-US relations are amicable, it would be unfathomable for a US Congressperson to say “our King Charles III.” However, a Taiwanese legislator used “our” to express affinity with Xi — the head of a hostile state intent on annexing Taiwan.
That reminds me of a pro-unification colleague at Shih Hsin University, Wang Hsiao-po (王曉波). At a meeting in Beijing, he said: “We gave Taiwan great terms for the ‘one country, two systems’ principle, and yet they rejected it!” He was clearly taking the stance of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), as the “we” he referred to could certainly not be Taiwan.
Born in Guizhou, China, one might understand how Wang came to develop a “China complex.” However, for Taiwan-born Chin, refusing to stand with Taiwan and sacrificing the interests of indigenous peoples to the CCP is the height of hypocrisy. Perhaps personal profit or a Chinese nationalist education swayed her to it.
On a Taiwanese history general knowledge test, when asked: “During WWII, which country bombed Taiwan?” 30 percent of my students incorrectly answered “Japan.”
“Taiwan was a Japanese colony, why would Japan attack its own territory?” I retorted.
A student replied: “Didn’t we fight Japan for eight years?”
The root issue was revealed: The student’s “we” was taken from China’s viewpoint rather than Taiwan’s. This is the result of “de-Taiwanization” education policies implemented by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). With Chinese perspectives consistently prioritized over Taiwanese history, students are misled into a Sino-centric narrative.
Below are three instances of lingering Chinese nationalism:
When paying homage to the CCP, retired army general Chen Ting-chung (陳廷寵) cursed those who supported Taiwanese independence, calling them “the scum of the Chinese nation.”
Former National Defense University principal Hsia Ying-chou (夏瀛洲) said: “Both the People’s Liberation Army and the Republic of China Armed Forces are Chinese armies.”
Former KMT Huang Fu-hsing branch legislator Tsang You-hsia (臧幼俠) said: “I would rather unify with the CCP than submit to the Democratic Progressive Party [DPP].”
As “Mainlanders” who are not originally from Taiwan, their reactions are unsurprising. Entrapped in the myth of Chinese nationalism, they lack values of democracy, freedom and human rights — let alone any sense of Taiwanese identity.
However, it becomes concerning when Taiwanese share similar views. A friend recently recounted a story from a trip to Tibet, where a businessman from Tainan told the local tour guide: “[President] William Lai’s (賴清德) presidency will solidify Taiwanese identity. We must quickly reunite Taiwan with China!”
Such sentiments from profit-driven businesspeople willing to sell out Taiwan are loathsome.
Yet, there are some instances where my faith in a shared Taiwanese identity is restored. DPP Legislator Saidhai Tahovecahe (伍麗華) shared such a story with me.
During a “Patriot Week” assembly in a Pingtung County primary school, the principal addressed the students: “It’s Patriot Week, and we all love our country. And what is the name of our country?”
“Taiwan!” all students replied in unison.
“Yes, we are Taiwan, but we are also the Republic of China,” he added, awkwardly attempting to smooth things over.
Lee Hsiao-feng is an honorary professor at National Taipei University of Education.
Translated by Gabrielle Killick
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS