Russia’s standing in the international community — from economic pariah to massive supplier of fossil fuels — seems perfectly suited to the predicament faced by traditional Chinese automakers. In fact, sanctions against Moscow are likely the single-largest driver of vehicle exports from its neighbor since the invasion of Ukraine began more than two years ago.
As China’s economy slows and buyers are increasingly choosing electric vehicles (EV), makers of old-school internal-combustion-engine (ICE) cars had become desperate to find new markets. The US is off the table amid an escalating trade war, and the EU’s appetite for foreign models is fading, leaving few good choices after Russia’s attack on Ukraine spurred overseas companies to ditch the country.
“Western sanctions on Russia have created a major market opportunity for China’s internal combustion engine auto sector, providing a lifeline to the industry and deepening Russia’s dependence on Chinese goods,” Gerard DiPippo and Alexander Isakov of Bloomberg Economics wrote last month.
They estimated 58 percent of the increase in the nation’s ICE exports since 2021 went to Russia last year. While most of that trade flows directly across the border, some also go via transshipment intermediaries, including Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Turkey.
Moscow and Beijing have a lot in common. They both feel under siege from the West, show a willingness to interrupt the international order, and face an existential need to wean themselves off foreign supply chains.
While local brand Lada, owned by AvtoVAZ PJSC, still topped the market and increased its share past 30 percent, the next six-largest players last year were all from China, displacing South Korea’s Kia Motors Corp and Hyundai Motor Co and Japan’s Toyota Motor Corp, data from Autostat.ru showed. Chery Automobile Co was the biggest winner. Its unit sales in Russia jumped threefold, taking 11 percent of the market. Haval, a brand under Great Wall Motor Co, saw a similar increase in scale with its Jolion crossover SUV the most-popular foreign model on the market. That growth in Russia is welcome news for Great Wall: The company last month shut down its European headquarters in Munich as it failed to gain traction on the continent.
Chinese automakers face a struggle. Some of their existing equipment can be switched to making electrified models, particularly chassis and interiors, but a lot cannot. Engines, and related components such as gearboxes and drive shafts, would face softening demand from an increasing uptake in EVs. Yet the capacity for these parts remains, hence the need to find foreign markets. Russia is particularly well suited because buyers there have shunned EVs.
Last year, gasoline-powered vehicles’ share of the auto market actually rose, to 93.7 percent from 91.6 percent, according to Autostat.ru, with diesel and hybrid models adding to the fossil-fuel mix. Pure EVs accounted for just 1.3 percent of the market.
That might not be good news for EV makers, or the planet, but these holdouts are exactly what China’s traditional automakers need at a time of excess capacity and a long-term shift toward new-energy models.
However, the dilemma for Beijing would be how to manage escalating demands from Moscow that suppliers move production to Russia if they want to keep selling into the market. China’s economic slowdown, weakening exports and overcapacity has policymakers searching for ways to prop up employment and keep factories humming. They would not be keen to see jobs and production head abroad.
Diplomacy might come into play. President Xi Jinping (習近平) has shown a willingness to side with his counterpart Vladimir Putin but that support is not endless nor absolute. If Moscow keeps pressuring foreign automakers to expand their local manufacturing footprint, Xi might need to push back. At the end of the day, Beijing is happy to have found a new market for its wares, but its leaders know it must put China’s economy first.
Tim Culpan is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering technology in Asia. Previously, he was a technology reporter for Bloomberg News. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS