The New Cabinet and Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) are starting out with a clean slate.
Minister of Labor Ho Pei-shan (何佩珊) has clearly stated that her ministry does not intend to allow foreign migrant workers to work in the services sector. Consequently, the hotel and tourism industry’s desire to recruit migrant workers has been dashed.
Since the end of the COVID-19 pandemic, tourist numbers have largely recovered, but tourism workers have not matched this by returning to their old jobs, and hotels and tour operators are suffering from a serious shortage of workers. The Tourism Administration published a report on the likely effects of opening the travel and hospitality sector up to migrant workers. According to the report, Taiwan’s hotel operators have a shortfall of 8,000 workers, including 5,500 housekeeping and cleaning staff. The report says that employment incentives and wage subsidies provided by the Ministry of Labor and the Tourism Administration have had little effect, and the labor shortage is holding back the tourism sector’s recovery.
Over the past year while they were still in office, former premier Chen Chien-jen (陳建仁) and former vice premier Cheng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) chaired meetings that provided some hope for opening the hospitality industry to migrant workers. The Tourism Administration formally requested this measure, suggesting that foreign migrant workers could be employed in basic tasks such as room service and cleaning.
The hospitality industry is the first segment of the nation’s services sector that could be opened up to foreign migrant workers. This proposal, coming during the sensitive period before January’s presidential and legislative elections, was sure to have a rough ride. The ministry employed delaying tactics, creating difficulties by forming a working group of experts and academics who repeatedly asked for supplementary information.
South Korea is also suffering from a shortage of workers and recently officially started accepting applications to employ foreign migrant workers in hotels and restaurants, with the first quota of 4,490 workers filling jobs that South Koreans were not willing to do, such as room service, cleaning and kitchen assistants. If South Korea can do it, why can’t Taiwan do it, too?
South Korea’s 62 five-star hotels had about 116,000 employees after the COVID-19 pandemic, which was more than 20 percent less than before. This serious shortage of workers has forced hotels to downscale their operations, especially their catering services. Evidently South Korea and Taiwan are facing the same problem.
Since South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol took office, his administration has greatly increased the number of E-9 non-professional employment visas. South Korea last year took in 125,000 foreign migrant workers, which was the largest quota in the past 20 years, and this year that number is expected to increase to a record-high of 165,000.
South Korean hotels and restaurants intake of foreign migrant workers is a limited trial. It specifically applies to restaurants that have been in operation for at least five years, which can each apply for one or two foreign kitchen assistants. Only hotels in Seoul, Busan, Jeju Island and Gangwon Province are eligible. Each hotel can apply to employ between four and 25 migrant workers to work as cleaners or kitchen assistants, in proportion to the number of South Korean workers they employ. South Korea’s step-by-step approach to employing migrant workers in the services sector is a good example that Taiwan would do well to follow.
Chen Yung-chang is a former deputy secretary-general of the Taipei Chamber of Commerce.
Translated by Julian Clegg
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
Authorities last week revoked the residency permit of a Chinese social media influencer surnamed Liu (劉), better known by her online channel name Yaya in Taiwan (亞亞在台灣), who has more than 440,000 followers online and is living in Taiwan with a marriage-based residency permit, for her “reunification by force” comments. She was asked to leave the country in 10 days. The National Immigration Agency (NIA) on Tuesday last week announced the decision, citing the influencer’s several controversial public comments, including saying that “China does not need any other reason to reunify Taiwan with force” and “why is it [China] hesitant
A media report has suggested that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) was considering initiating a vote of no confidence in Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) in a bid to “bring down the Cabinet.” The KMT has denied that this topic was ever discussed. Why might such a move have even be considered? It would have been absurd if it had seen the light of day — potentially leading to a mass loss of legislative seats for the KMT even without the recall petitions already under way. Today the second phase of the recall movement is to begin — which has
RSS