On Tuesday last week, the Legislative Yuan passed the third reading of amendments aimed at updating Article 141 of the Criminal Code.
The revised bill — forced through by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) — stipulates that public servants who make false statements during hearings or questioning about important matters of which they have knowledge can face up to one year in prison and fines as high as NT$200,000.
Based on Constitutional Court rulings, the amended article is unconstitutional.
According to Constitutional Court Judgement No. 113 Hsien-Pan-5 regarding the offense of insulting public servants or their official duties, actions that constitute contempt of the legislature fall under the scope of speech that criticizes the actions taken by officials in the course of carrying out their duties rather than the officials themselves.
The judgement is similar to Article 140 of the Criminal Code regulating insults to public servants, whereby a “person who insults a public official during the discharge of his legal duties or publicly make[s] insults about his discharge of such legal duties shall be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than one year, short-term imprisonment, or a fine of not more than one hundred thousand New Taiwan Dollars.”
Constitutional Court Judgement No. 113 Hsien-Pan-5 further states that a provision conflicting with the constitutional guarantee of freedom of speech must undergo “strict scrutiny” — a judicial review method used by courts to determine the constitutionality of laws. To pass the scrutiny test and be classified as constitutional, a law must be indispensable and use the least restrictive means possible, and the legislative intent must be in pursuit of compelling public interest.
The “contempt of the legislature” bill should be modeled after the US legal system, in which its “contempt of Congress” is based upon “contempt of court” regulations.
Taiwan has its own equivalent law on the principle of contempt of court. Article 95 of Taiwan’s Court Organization Act (法院組織法) states that anyone “who violates orders, issued by the presiding judge, commissioned judge, or assigned judge, to maintain courtroom order, which lead to obstructing courtroom proceedings, and refuses to comply after being warned, shall receive a maximum penalty of 3 months’ imprisonment, detention or a maximum fine of NT$30,000.”
Under constitutional review standards, for someone to be prosecuted for contempt of court, they must have contravened an order, caused an obstruction to courtroom proceedings and refused to comply after being cautioned.
By contrast, the revised bill proposed by the KMT and TPP defines contempt of the legislature with a single criterion: providing a false statement during hearings or questioning in the Legislative Yuan. The overly broad scope for punishment raises concerns about the constitutionality of the amendments.
The Legislative Yuan has the duty to proactively carry out investigations.
It is thus unlikely that the amendments regarding contempt of the legislature would pass the scrutiny test, as imposing a criminal penalty does not seem to be “indispensable” or the “least restrictive” means possible to achieve a compelling state interest.
Furthermore, contempt of court is an outdated concept rooted in monarchical-era legal thought. Outdated and unconstitutional, the relevance of the offense of contempt should be reconsidered in Taiwan.
Hu Tien-tzu is a senior enforcement officer at the Changhua branch of the Ministry of Justice’s Administrative Enforcement Agency.
Translated by Gabrielle Killick
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission
RSS