Taiwan’s exceptional expertise in semiconductor manufacturing has propelled the nation to a paramount position of global economic significance.
With renowned foundries such as the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) spearheading global high-end chip production, Taiwan’s dominance in this sector has not only catalyzed substantial economic growth, but also attracted considerable international attention and strategic interest.
Nevertheless, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry is confronting potential challenges. The global shortage of high-end chips, fueled by surging demand in sectors such as artificial intelligence (AI), underscores the industry’s indispensable role in the global economy and the urgent need for solutions.
At the same time, competitors are escalating their endeavors to narrow the technological gap, investing substantially in advanced technology and production capacities, thereby intensifying the competitive landscape in the semiconductor sector.
Is Taiwan equipped to uphold its competitive advantage in this high-stakes arena? This hinges upon its capacity to not only innovate dynamically, but also to swiftly scale up production capabilities and adeptly navigate intricate geopolitical dynamics.
Taiwan’s strategic maneuvers in the future would exert a profound influence on the trajectory of the global technology and manufacturing landscapes.
The prevailing shortage of high-end chips represents an opportunity for Taiwan’s semiconductor manufacturers to solidify their global dominance.
To bolster resilience, Taiwan should embark on a multifaceted approach, diversifying its production capacity across a broader array of domestic fabs while fostering robust partnerships with local governments.
Through the expansion and modernization of facilities, the semiconductor industry can significantly amplify its output, alleviating the strain on individual foundries.
Moreover, fostering deeper collaborations with international counterparts would inject added stability and adaptability into the intricate web of the supply chain.
Taiwan must adopt a forward-thinking approach to fortify its competitive edge. Central to this endeavor is a steadfast commitment to investing substantially in cutting-edge research and development (R&D).
Concurrently, nurturing and cultivating a highly adept talent pool comprising proficient engineers and scientists through comprehensive educational and training programs are imperative steps toward propelling technological breakthroughs.
Facilitating seamless collaboration among industry stalwarts, academic institutions and government bodies is essential for nurturing a fertile ecosystem conducive to innovation and sustained progress.
Also important is the establishment of a resilient and sustainable supply chain. This entails ensuring a consistent flow of raw materials, bolstering manufacturing capabilities and fervently embracing transformative technologies such as AI and quantum computing.
Proactive government policies that staunchly support research and development initiatives, furnish ample funding avenues and foster synergistic public-private partnerships would be instrumental here.
Geopolitical considerations inject an added layer of intricacy. The ongoing geopolitical tensions among major global powers loom ominously over Taiwan’s economic trajectory, causing uncertainty and risks.
Taiwan must diversify its supply chains and bolster collaboration with other nations. By fortifying economic ties with countries sharing strategic interests, Taiwan can forge more resilient and dependable streams of raw materials and manufacturing inputs. Additionally, the pursuit of strategic trade agreements and alliances with burgeoning markets can unlock fresh avenues for expansion.
Furthermore, investing in bolstering domestic capabilities to produce crucial raw materials and cutting-edge manufacturing components would promote self-sufficiency and diminishing reliance on external sources.
Sustaining Taiwan’s preeminence in the semiconductor sphere demands a multifaceted approach. By capitalizing on this opportune moment, Taiwan can cement its standing as a front-runner in the global semiconductor marathon.
Darson Chiu is director-general of the Confederation of Asia-Pacific Chambers of Commerce and Industry.
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS