As the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) continued to promote their “contempt of the legislature” bills and made a farce of legislative procedure, the public took to the streets to protest, just as it did 10 years ago with the Sunflower movement.
The UK Parliament possesses high constitutional status and great authority, but it cannot abuse its powers.
First of all, a legislative reform bill is not a small deal. The proposal should be publicized in the first reading and drafted as a green or white paper for prior public consultation. The principle of the proposal should be clearly stated and submitted for legislative debate after the public reaches a consensus.
It is absurd that KMT legislators should be allowed to comply with Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) wishes and create such chaos in the legislature.
In the UK, in certain circumstances, parliament has the right to summon specific people and ask them to provide evidence or submit documents before a session. Only select committees that have passed the resolution possess this authority, and the committee would give people summoned parliamentary immunity so that they can speak freely.
If parliament wants to prosecute someone, the approval of a prosecutor is necessary. It is unreasonable for Taiwanese legislators to be able to prosecute those who refuse to obey.
The legislature needs reform, but as former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislator Lin Cho-shui (林濁水) has said, that reform should not introduce new crimes such as “contempt of legislature” and forget the basic responsibilities of lawmakers.
In addition, in the UK, the person elected to be the speaker of the House of Commons immediately withdraws from their party to show neutrality. Also, parties would not nominate candidates to compete for the seat of the speaker’s constituency.
In Taiwan, Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) has his own political stance and remains in the KMT, and this lacks neutrality. For anyone familiar with the Westminster system, it is preposterous that Han, in his current status, could become legislative speaker.
With the nonsensical proposals and the chaos, the legislature has lost its credibility in the eyes of the public. The KMT and the TPP should withdraw the proposals, or the legislature might face dissolution and realignment.
In many Western nations, if lawmakers behave unreasonably and uncontrollably, parliament would be dissolved and re-elected. Also, a constitutional reform committee would be established to let parties and the public discuss how to improve the parliament.
Although discontentment from the public has yet to reach this level, whether the legislature would soon face dissolution is hard to tell.
Martin Oei is a Hong Kong-born British political commentator based in Germany and a member of the UK’s Conservative Party.
Translated by Chien Yan-ru
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
RSS