The Indonesian government should be deeply concerned about China’s recent military exercises near Taiwan, as they are purportedly intended to send a “warning” to the elected government of Taiwan led by President William Lai (賴清德).
The action is particularly alarming because Taiwan is home to approximately 350,000 Indonesian workers, who are employed in the manufacturing and non-manufacturing sectors.
Data from the Taipei Economic and Trade Office in Surabaya show that there are 30,000 Indonesians residing in Taiwan who have married Taiwanese, while 20,000 Indonesians are studying in Taiwan.
The data highlight the importance that Indonesia engages in efforts to prevent zero-sum game scenarios in the Taiwan Strait, which would have severe adverse consequences for Indonesia.
Indonesia, recognized as a diplomatic intermediary in global affairs, has the capability to engage in mediating this potential situation of conflicting interests. Indonesia possesses an abundance of capital due to its highly cordial connections with the two parties.
Indonesia’s commitment to preserving strong relations with China is accompanied by a deep respect for its “one China” policy. Nevertheless, Indonesia is highly proficient in implementing its open and assertive foreign policy. It has an Indonesian Trade and Economic Office in Taipei, which can be considered a de facto Indonesian embassy.
An effective approach for Indonesia to adhere to the “one China” policy is to engage in dialogue, albeit with the need for assertive persuasion.
Nevertheless, this pursuit remains viable due to the explicit declaration made by Lai during his inauguration speech. He affirmed that Taiwan would adhere to the “status quo” in the Taiwan Strait, indicating that it would persist with its “peaceful” strategy.
Lai underscored the significance of this approach by emphasizing that “peace is invaluable and warfare yields no victor.”
Lai’s statement can serve as a valuable resource for Indonesia in urging China to abstain from military aggression, which would undoubtedly have severe consequences for all parties involved, including Indonesia. The potential losses resulting from a military annexation are unimaginable.
Indonesia can initiate discourse by highlighting the amicable rapport between Indonesia and China thus far, substantiated by successful collaborations across several domains.
China has emerged as Indonesia’s primary trading partner, with trade value estimated to be US$127 billion this year. China will undoubtedly take into account the advice from Indonesia, its closest ally in Southeast Asia, due to the strong emphasis on the positive relationship between the two countries.
Indonesia can propose constructive dialogue to China, particularly by raising the issue at the ASEAN forum. This is especially important because many citizens of ASEAN members, such as the Philippines, Vietnam and Malaysia, also have a presence in Taiwan. By engaging in dialogue, Indonesia’s message would be impactful and China would be motivated to listen.
China, being concerned about its interests in Southeast Asia, would not want its military activities in the Taiwan Strait to disrupt the region. Regarding other aspects, it is desirable that the situation in the Taiwan Strait remains stable and that China’s sincere commitment to maintaining the current state of affairs can also be achieved.
M. Syaprin Zahidi is a senior lecturer in the Department of International Relations at the University of Muhammadiyah Malang in Malang and is a doctoral student at Ghazali Shafie Graduate School of Government at the Universiti Utara Malaysia in Kedah state.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
On today’s page, Masahiro Matsumura, a professor of international politics and national security at St Andrew’s University in Osaka, questions the viability and advisability of the government’s proposed “T-Dome” missile defense system. Matsumura writes that Taiwan’s military budget would be better allocated elsewhere, and cautions against the temptation to allow politics to trump strategic sense. What he does not do is question whether Taiwan needs to increase its defense capabilities. “Given the accelerating pace of Beijing’s military buildup and political coercion ... [Taiwan] cannot afford inaction,” he writes. A rational, robust debate over the specifics, not the scale or the necessity,
RSS