President William Lai (賴清德) was officially sworn in on Monday, marking the start of a historic third consecutive term of the Democratic Progress Party (DPP) government. While urging China to share the responsibility of promoting peace in the Taiwan Strait and the world, Lai has called on Beijing to accept the existence of the Republic of China (ROC) and acknowledge Taiwan’s elected government.
In his inauguration speech, Lai underlined that “we have a nation insofar as we have sovereignty,” and in a rare move, quoted the first chapter of the Constitution, saying: “The sovereignty of the Republic of China shall reside in the whole body of citizen” and “persons possessing the nationality of the Republic of China shall be citizens of the ROC.”
He said the two articles clearly state that “the ROC and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) are not subordinated to each other.” Lai’s quotation obviously aims to verify the “status quo” in the Taiwan Strait and uphold the sovereignty of the ROC in Taiwan based on the Constitution.
It also served as evidence to some pro-China politicians such as former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), who often mentions the so-called “constitutional one China” framework, which vaguely claims that the ROC and the PRC are both “China,” but has trapped Taiwan’s legal status and international image in the PRC’s “one China principle” and its version of the so-called “1992 consensus” that allows no room for the interpretation of “China” as the ROC.
On Lai’s inauguration day, Beijing issued a statement to reiterate its interpretation of UN Resolution 2758, a response to pushback by some US officials and lawmakers regarding China’s increasing “misuse” of the resolution. While calling for support for Taiwan’s meaningful participation in the World Health Assembly and international community, US Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs Daniel Kritenbrink and Deputy Assistant Secretary in the Bureau of East Asia and Pacific Affairs Mark Lambert have denounced China’s mischaracterization of UN Resolution 2758 by falsely conflating it with its “one-China principle.”
China’s reaction nevertheless has shone a spotlight on the fact that Resolution 2758 passed in 1971, stated only that “the PRC is the only legitimate government of China.”
The resolution replaced the ROC with the PRC as a permanent member of the Security Council in the UN to solve the issue of China’s representation in the UN system, but not a word referred to Taiwan or its international status.
After Lai’s inauguration, Beijing, unsurprisingly, labeled him a “dangerous separatist” and called his speech “a confession of Taiwanese independence,” then followed this by launching a two-day Joint Sword 2024A military drill around Taiwan yesterday.
Lai did not push for anything new to change or expand the political sovereignty of the ROC in Taiwan, but presented the facts, in accordance with the Constitution, the reality of the situation across the strait and the consensus of the vast majority of Taiwanese.
Being an elected leader of 24 million Taiwanese, Lai also pledged to “neither yield nor provoke,” but seek peace with China, showing goodwill by wanting to resume dialogue to avoid possible conflict.
The PRC should acknowledge the facts and this goodwill, not unilaterally change “the status quo” to upend peace in the Taiwan Strait and the world.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS