President William Lai (賴清德) was officially sworn in on Monday, marking the start of a historic third consecutive term of the Democratic Progress Party (DPP) government. While urging China to share the responsibility of promoting peace in the Taiwan Strait and the world, Lai has called on Beijing to accept the existence of the Republic of China (ROC) and acknowledge Taiwan’s elected government.
In his inauguration speech, Lai underlined that “we have a nation insofar as we have sovereignty,” and in a rare move, quoted the first chapter of the Constitution, saying: “The sovereignty of the Republic of China shall reside in the whole body of citizen” and “persons possessing the nationality of the Republic of China shall be citizens of the ROC.”
He said the two articles clearly state that “the ROC and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) are not subordinated to each other.” Lai’s quotation obviously aims to verify the “status quo” in the Taiwan Strait and uphold the sovereignty of the ROC in Taiwan based on the Constitution.
It also served as evidence to some pro-China politicians such as former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), who often mentions the so-called “constitutional one China” framework, which vaguely claims that the ROC and the PRC are both “China,” but has trapped Taiwan’s legal status and international image in the PRC’s “one China principle” and its version of the so-called “1992 consensus” that allows no room for the interpretation of “China” as the ROC.
On Lai’s inauguration day, Beijing issued a statement to reiterate its interpretation of UN Resolution 2758, a response to pushback by some US officials and lawmakers regarding China’s increasing “misuse” of the resolution. While calling for support for Taiwan’s meaningful participation in the World Health Assembly and international community, US Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs Daniel Kritenbrink and Deputy Assistant Secretary in the Bureau of East Asia and Pacific Affairs Mark Lambert have denounced China’s mischaracterization of UN Resolution 2758 by falsely conflating it with its “one-China principle.”
China’s reaction nevertheless has shone a spotlight on the fact that Resolution 2758 passed in 1971, stated only that “the PRC is the only legitimate government of China.”
The resolution replaced the ROC with the PRC as a permanent member of the Security Council in the UN to solve the issue of China’s representation in the UN system, but not a word referred to Taiwan or its international status.
After Lai’s inauguration, Beijing, unsurprisingly, labeled him a “dangerous separatist” and called his speech “a confession of Taiwanese independence,” then followed this by launching a two-day Joint Sword 2024A military drill around Taiwan yesterday.
Lai did not push for anything new to change or expand the political sovereignty of the ROC in Taiwan, but presented the facts, in accordance with the Constitution, the reality of the situation across the strait and the consensus of the vast majority of Taiwanese.
Being an elected leader of 24 million Taiwanese, Lai also pledged to “neither yield nor provoke,” but seek peace with China, showing goodwill by wanting to resume dialogue to avoid possible conflict.
The PRC should acknowledge the facts and this goodwill, not unilaterally change “the status quo” to upend peace in the Taiwan Strait and the world.
A response to my article (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” Aug. 12, page 8) mischaracterizes my arguments, as well as a speech by former British prime minister Boris Johnson at the Ketagalan Forum in Taipei early last month. Tseng Yueh-ying (曾月英) in the response (“A misreading of Johnson’s speech,” Aug. 24, page 8) does not dispute that Johnson referred repeatedly to Taiwan as “a segment of the Chinese population,” but asserts that the phrase challenged Beijing by questioning whether parts of “the Chinese population” could be “differently Chinese.” This is essentially a confirmation of Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formulation, which says that
“History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes” (attributed to Mark Twain). The USSR was the international bully during the Cold War as it sought to make the world safe for Soviet-style Communism. China is now the global bully as it applies economic power and invests in Mao’s (毛澤東) magic weapons (the People’s Liberation Army [PLA], the United Front Work Department, and the Chinese Communist Party [CCP]) to achieve world domination. Freedom-loving countries must respond to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), especially in the Indo-Pacific (IP), as resolutely as they did against the USSR. In 1954, the US and its allies
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in China yesterday, where he is to attend a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin today. As this coincides with the 50 percent US tariff levied on Indian products, some Western news media have suggested that Modi is moving away from the US, and into the arms of China and Russia. Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation fellow Sana Hashmi in a Taipei Times article published yesterday titled “Myths around Modi’s China visit” said that those analyses have misrepresented India’s strategic calculations, and attempted to view
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) stood in front of the Potala Palace in Lhasa on Thursday last week, flanked by Chinese flags, synchronized schoolchildren and armed Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) troops, he was not just celebrating the 60th anniversary of the establishment of the “Tibet Autonomous Region,” he was making a calculated declaration: Tibet is China. It always has been. Case closed. Except it has not. The case remains wide open — not just in the hearts of Tibetans, but in history records. For decades, Beijing has insisted that Tibet has “always been part of China.” It is a phrase
RSS