President William Lai (賴清德) was officially sworn in on Monday, marking the start of a historic third consecutive term of the Democratic Progress Party (DPP) government. While urging China to share the responsibility of promoting peace in the Taiwan Strait and the world, Lai has called on Beijing to accept the existence of the Republic of China (ROC) and acknowledge Taiwan’s elected government.
In his inauguration speech, Lai underlined that “we have a nation insofar as we have sovereignty,” and in a rare move, quoted the first chapter of the Constitution, saying: “The sovereignty of the Republic of China shall reside in the whole body of citizen” and “persons possessing the nationality of the Republic of China shall be citizens of the ROC.”
He said the two articles clearly state that “the ROC and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) are not subordinated to each other.” Lai’s quotation obviously aims to verify the “status quo” in the Taiwan Strait and uphold the sovereignty of the ROC in Taiwan based on the Constitution.
It also served as evidence to some pro-China politicians such as former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), who often mentions the so-called “constitutional one China” framework, which vaguely claims that the ROC and the PRC are both “China,” but has trapped Taiwan’s legal status and international image in the PRC’s “one China principle” and its version of the so-called “1992 consensus” that allows no room for the interpretation of “China” as the ROC.
On Lai’s inauguration day, Beijing issued a statement to reiterate its interpretation of UN Resolution 2758, a response to pushback by some US officials and lawmakers regarding China’s increasing “misuse” of the resolution. While calling for support for Taiwan’s meaningful participation in the World Health Assembly and international community, US Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs Daniel Kritenbrink and Deputy Assistant Secretary in the Bureau of East Asia and Pacific Affairs Mark Lambert have denounced China’s mischaracterization of UN Resolution 2758 by falsely conflating it with its “one-China principle.”
China’s reaction nevertheless has shone a spotlight on the fact that Resolution 2758 passed in 1971, stated only that “the PRC is the only legitimate government of China.”
The resolution replaced the ROC with the PRC as a permanent member of the Security Council in the UN to solve the issue of China’s representation in the UN system, but not a word referred to Taiwan or its international status.
After Lai’s inauguration, Beijing, unsurprisingly, labeled him a “dangerous separatist” and called his speech “a confession of Taiwanese independence,” then followed this by launching a two-day Joint Sword 2024A military drill around Taiwan yesterday.
Lai did not push for anything new to change or expand the political sovereignty of the ROC in Taiwan, but presented the facts, in accordance with the Constitution, the reality of the situation across the strait and the consensus of the vast majority of Taiwanese.
Being an elected leader of 24 million Taiwanese, Lai also pledged to “neither yield nor provoke,” but seek peace with China, showing goodwill by wanting to resume dialogue to avoid possible conflict.
The PRC should acknowledge the facts and this goodwill, not unilaterally change “the status quo” to upend peace in the Taiwan Strait and the world.
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
After “Operation Absolute Resolve” to capture former Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro, the US joined Israel on Saturday last week in launching “Operation Epic Fury” to remove Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his theocratic regime leadership team. The two blitzes are widely believed to be a prelude to US President Donald Trump changing the geopolitical landscape in the Indo-Pacific region, targeting China’s rise. In the National Security Strategic report released in December last year, the Trump administration made it clear that the US would focus on “restoring American pre-eminence in the Western hemisphere,” and “competing with China economically and militarily
RSS