Xenotransplantation, the futuristic-sounding field of animal-to-human organ transplants, is suddenly a lot closer to reality. The first two gene-edited pig kidneys have been transplanted into humans — and, so far, seem to be working beautifully.
It is an astonishing advance in a field that has languished for years. It is also priming a race between companies in the field.
Who will be first to convince the world their technologies are the most viable?
Last year, researchers offered evidence that these pig organs could work in the long term — in monkeys, at least. One monkey lived for two years after receiving an organ developed by eGenesis, a biotech firm cofounded by Harvard bioengineer George Church. That added to several studies suggesting pig organs were functional for short stints when transplanted into brain-dead people who had donated their bodies to science.
Then last month, eGenesis provided a kidney to Richard Slayman. After being treated for an early sign of rejection, he was able to leave Massachusetts General Hospital, whose surgeons performed the transplant, just two weeks later.
It was a stunning turnaround for the 62-year-old Massachusetts man, who had four years earlier received a human kidney that was failing.
Due to a raft of other health problems, he had just a 16 percent chance of getting a transplant within the following five years, said one of his doctors, Winfred Williams, associate chief of the hospital’s nephrology division.
Now we have got a second success story, this time with a pig kidney developed by United Therapeutics Corp.
Like Slayman, New Jersey resident Lisa Pisano was “very ill and caught in a medical catch-22,” said Robert Montgomery, the director of the NYU Langone Transplant Institute, where the surgery was performed.
Pisano’s heart and kidney were failing, yet her other health conditions kept her off the organ donation list and although a medical device called a left ventricular assist device could have helped pump blood from her heart to the rest of her body, it has not been an option for someone on dialysis — the mortality rate is too high.
That left Pisano with weeks to live.
The 54-year-old became the first person ever to undergo a combined heart pump and pig kidney transplant. Nearly two weeks later, the organ seems to be working beautifully and she has shown no signs of rejecting it.
Talking to reporters via Zoom from her hospital bed, Pisano said: “I feel fantastic. I feel the best I’ve felt in a long time.”
Slayman’s and Pisano’s plights are faced by far too many people. They are too sick to be eligible for an organ donation, or one does not arrive in time, and on a more basic level, there just are not enough organs to go around.
According to the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network, nearly 90,000 people are waiting for a kidney.
Williams said that people with certain blood types might wait on average for six to seven years for a kidney — and too often one does not arrive in time.
The next few months will be an important test for whether pig kidneys can dispatch with those long waits. Doctors will be watching to see whether the patients’ immune systems continue to tolerate the organs.
They will also be watching whether one organ does better than the other. Slayman’s pig kidney features 69 edits, most of which are intended to turn off genes that might put him at risk of infection.
By contrast, the organ that Lisa Pisano received had just a single gene edit. It was intended to knock out a sugar sitting on the surface of pig cells that triggers an immune reaction.
Her kidney also had tissue from the pig’s thymus grafted to it, a modification intended to help train the recipient’s immune system to be tolerant of the pig kidney.
Ultimately, the hope is that the addition of the thymus allows recipients to be weaned from some of the powerful immunosuppressant drugs that follow transplants.
The two strategies (and others in development, including a pig kidney from United Therapeutics with 10 gene edits) have sparked a debate about whether less is more (or more is more) when it comes to gene edits intended to make these organs safer. The goal is to provide an organ that properly functions, while minimizing the risks of rejection and maximizing long-term safety.
The next step will be clinical trials. Williams believes that if Slayman’s pig kidney keeps him stable and continues to look safe over the next six months to a year, it is time for the US Food and Drug Administration to allow formal studies to move forward.
That is a sentiment echoed by United Therapeutics, which believes it might be allowed to start clinical trials of its pig kidneys next year.
No matter which technology wins — and I hope there is not just one winning strategy, but several — it is important to stay focused on the ultimate prize: a world where no one has to die waiting for a donor.
And of course, we cannot overlook the true pioneers here: Pisano and Slayman. It is no small thing to step up to be the first. While of course they were hoping for more time with their families, they knew there was a reasonable chance of a grimmer outcome. They also understand their important role in medical history.
As Pisano told reporters: “The worst-case scenario, if it doesn’t work, it might work for the next person.”
Lisa Jarvis is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering biotech, healthcare and the pharmaceutical industry. Previously, she was executive editor of Chemical & Engineering News. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
As India’s six-week-long general election grinds past the halfway mark, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s messaging has shifted from confident to shrill. After the first couple of phases of polling showed a 3 percentage point drop in turnout, Modi and his party leaders have largely stopped promoting their accomplishments of the past 10 years — or, for that matter, the “Modi guarantees” offered in the Bharatiya Janata Party’s (BJP) manifesto for the next five. Instead, making the majority Hindu population fear and loathe Muslims seems to be the BJP’s preferred talking point. Modi went on the offensive in an April 21
As Ukraine leads the global fight for democracy, Taiwan, facing a potential war with China, should draw lessons from Ukraine’s cyberwarfare success. Taiwan has been enhancing its arsenal with advanced weapons from the West in anticipation of a possible full-scale invasion. However, Taipei should also consider Ukraine’s effective digital warfare, notably the “IT [information technology] Army,” a decentralized force instrumental in Kyiv’s cybercampaigns. In February 2022, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine marked the onset of a significant cyberwar, where fears of a “digital Pearl Harbor” in Ukraine were unmet, thanks to robust cyberdefenses backed by Western public and private support. This led
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is attempting to create an alternative international world order to the US-dominated model. China has benefited hugely from the current order since former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平) opened up its economy five decades ago. Countries can be categorized as continental or maritime, and to a great degree this determines their optimum foreign policy. China is continental, as is Russia. The US initially followed a continental foreign policy, before it settled on a maritime model. The British empire was so successful because a tiny island kingdom built a formidable naval presence. The US-dominated world order, stabilized by
With the addition this year of Sweden and last year Finland to NATO, the Baltic Sea has been dubbed a “NATO lake” by some analysts. A glance at a map shows that is largely (but not completely) true — the coastline has a couple of slivers of Russian territory. The rest of the coastal littoral is in NATO hands: Sweden, Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Germany and Denmark. Russia controls a bit of coast between Lithuania and Poland because of its strange enclave of Kaliningrad. Russian President Vladimir Putin remains in control of the far eastern corner of the Baltic Sea