The tragic death of a judge who fell from a building on April 12 accentuated the issue of long-term overtime work endangering the mental and physical health of judicial officials.
Many have advocated for an increase in personnel or adjustments in case distribution to relieve the overworked judicial system, but the problem cannot be solved without evidence-based measures.
The problem with the overworked judicial system is not just that it is short-staffed, but also a systematic problem of how to allocate judicial resources appropriately.
Aside from Taiwan, many other countries are facing the same challenges.
Indicator 16.3 of the UN’s 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) promotes “the rule of law at the national and international levels, and ensures equal access to justice for all,” encouraging the globe to conduct scientific empirical investigation and thorough understanding of the actual judicial needs of the public.
For this, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development collaborated with Pathfinders and published a policy paper last year titled “Improving the monitoring of SDG 16.3.3: Towards better access to justice,” to promote an international standard for access to justice.
The Legal Australia-Wide Survey: Legal need in Australia in 2012 states that the legal problems raised by 9 percent of interviewees accounted for 65 percent of the total, highlighting the centralization of access to justice.
In addition, about one-third of Australians would encounter at least one legal issue within two years, with common disputes tied to consumerism, neighborhoods or money.
Regarding vulnerable groups who need increased access to justice, the Australian government offered administrative resources and alternative dispute resolutions (ADR) to effectively ease the burden on the judicial system.
Additionally, the Canadian Legal Problems Survey conducted in 2021 revealed the same problem.
About 50 percent of Canadians were involved in legal disputes, most of which were domestic, consumer or neighborhood disputes.
Thus, the Canadian government successfully reduced the number of judicial cases by optimizing their ADR and providing legal services in communities.
Learning from international experiences, to cope with simple and common cases in high demand, increasing personnel in the administration would be more effective than adding personnel to the judicial system.
I hope president-elect William Lai (賴清德) will fulfill his commitment to establish a standing committee on judicial reform in charge of an empirical judicial inquiry, increase the number of administrative officials and loosen the overworked judicial system to achieve sustainable development goals for the country.
Hsiao Yi-ming is resource development manager of the Judicial Reform Foundation.
Translated by Chien Yan-ru
Weeks into the craze, nobody quite knows what to make of the OpenClaw mania sweeping China, marked by viral photos of retirees lining up for installation events and users gathering in red claw hats. The queues and cosplay inspired by the “raising a lobster” trend make for irresistible China clickbait. However, the West is fixating on the least important part of the story. As a consumer craze, OpenClaw — the AI agent designed to do tasks on a user’s behalf — would likely burn out. Without some developer background, it is too glitchy and technically awkward for true mainstream adoption,
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission
On Monday, a group of bipartisan US senators arrived in Taiwan to support the nation’s special defense bill to counter Chinese threats. At the same time, Beijing announced that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had invited Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) to visit China, a move to make the KMT a pawn in its proxy warfare against Taiwan and the US. Since her inauguration as KMT chair last year, Cheng, widely seen as a pro-China figure, has made no secret of her desire to interact with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and meet with Xi, naming it a
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) took the stage at a protest rally on Sunday in front of the Presidential Office Building in Taipei in support of former TPP chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), who has been sentenced to 17 years in jail for corruption and embezzlement. Huang told the crowd that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) had sent a message of support the previous day, saying she would be traveling from the south to Taipei: If the protest continued into the evening, she had said, she would show up. The rally was due to end
RSS