The giant stuffed bear, its face a twisted smile, lumbers across the screen. Menacing music swells. Shadows mask unknown threats. Christopher Robin begs for his life, and is that a sledgehammer about to pulverize a minor character’s head?
Thus unfolds the trailer for the movie released last year titled Winnie the Pooh: Blood and Honey, a slasher-film riff on A.A. Milne’s beloved characters, brought to you by... the expiration of copyright and the arrival of the classic children’s novel into the US public domain.
We were already living in an era teeming with remixes and repurposing, fan fiction and mashups. Then began a parade of characters and stories, led by Winnie the Pooh and Mickey Mouse with many more to follow, marching into the public domain, where anyone can do anything with anything and shape it into a new generation of stories and ideas.
Illustration: Constance Chou
After a two-decade drought brought on by congressional extensions of the copyright period in 1998, works again began entering the public domain — becoming available for use without licensing or payment — in 2019. The public began to notice in 2022, when Winnie the Pooh was freed for use as the 95-year copyright period elapsed on the novel that introduced him.
That made possible Blood and Honey — not to mention a sequel that dropped last month, a forthcoming third and plans for a “Poohniverse” of twisted public domain characters including Bambi and Pinocchio. Pooh going public was followed this year by a moment many thought would never come: the copyright expiration on the original version of Mickey Mouse, as he appeared in the 1928 Walt Disney short, Steamboat Willie.
The mouse and the bear are but the beginning. The heights of 20th-century pop culture — Superman among them — lie ahead.
Classic characters, new stories, fresh mashups. Will it all be a bonanza for makers? Are we entering a heyday of cross-generational collaboration or a plummet in intellectual property values as audiences get sick of seeing variations of the same old stories?
Does a murderous Pooh bear have something to show the 21st-century entertainment world?
Films from Hollywood’s early talkie era have started to become public. King Kong, who has one of his enormous feet in the public domain already because of complications between companies that own a piece of him, is scheduled to shed his remaining chains in 2029. Then, in the 2030s, Superman will soar into the public domain, followed in quick succession by Batman, the Joker and Wonder Woman.
The possibility of new stories is vast. So is the possibility of repetition. Classic stories and characters could get, well a bit tiresome.
“I don’t feel like it’s going to make that big a difference,” said Phil Johnston, an Oscar nominee who co-wrote Disney’s 2011 Wreck It-Ralph and co-wrote and co-directed its sequel, 2018’s Ralph Breaks the Internet.
“Like, Winnie the Pooh: Blood and Honey was a novelty, made a bit of a splash, I guess, but if someone makes Steamboat Willie [into] a jet ski movie or something, who cares?” he said. “If there’s some great new idea behind it, maybe, but there’s nothing I’m looking at where I’m thinking, ‘Oh, my God, now that The Jazz Singer is available, I’m going to redo that.’”
Many creators were clearly anxious to do something with The Great Gatsby, which has been subject to several reinterpretations in very different flavors since it became public in 2021, Duke University Center for the Study of Public Domain director Jennifer Jenkins said.
“We have our feminist retellings of The Great Gatsby, where Jordan gets to tell the story from her perspective, Daisy gets to tell the story from her perspective,” Jenkins says. “We got prequels, we got sequels, we’ve got musicals, TV shows, we’ve got the zombie version because we always do. These are things that you can do with public domain work. These are things that you can do with Mickey Mouse.”
However, the newly available works and characters are arriving after years of parent corporations demanding that every creation be tied to their intellectual property, and with some big, Barbie-sized exceptions, the returns are growing thinner and artists themselves are a little sick of it.
“The biggest limiting factor right now is that almost everything that anyone wants has to be from existing intellectual propertiy,” said Johnston, whose newest project is an animated adaptation of Roald Dahl’s The Twits for Netflix. “And that the notion of an original idea is somehow scary, certainly to a marketing entity, because they just have to work harder to get it into the public’s consciousness. That’s the bummer,” he added.
While William Shakespeare, Charles Dickens and Jane Austen have been public-domain gold mines at various times, other properties have proven more problematic. The forthcoming Wicked, starring Ariana Grande and Cynthia Erivo, is to be yet another attempt at using the public-domain work of author Frank Baum’s Oz series — filtered through a hit novel and Broadway show — to glom onto the classic status of the 1939 Wizard of Oz film. Previous tries led to little success, and most were outright flops, most recently 2013’s Oz the Great and Powerful, from Disney.
(In an odd quirk of the Wizard of Oz rights, the film’s most famous artifact, Dorothy’s ruby slippers, are still the intellectual property of MGM via the 1939 film. In Baum’s book, the shoes were silver.)
Some of the most effective use ever of public domain properties came from Disney itself in its early decades, turning time-tested folktales and novels into modern classics with Snow White, Pinocchio and Cinderella. It would later become the primary protector of the most valuable rights in entertainment, from the Marvel universe to the Star Wars galaxy to its homegrown content.
That has meant a major flowering through the years of fan art and fan fiction, with which the company has a mixed relationship.
“When you look at how the Disney organization actually engages with fan art, there’s a lot of looking the other way,” says Cory Doctorow, an author and activist who advocates for broader public ownership of works. “I always thought that there was so much opportunity for collaboration that was being missed there.”
He gives as an example binders full of fan-fiction biographies of the ghosts at Disney World’s Haunted Mansion, maintained by the teens who work there, which he observed when working on a project with the company’s so-called imagineers.
“Some of it actually is now part of the lore,” Doctorow said. “I think that creatively that is an organization that really embraces that. I think commercially it’s an organization that has really struggled with it.”
When the law extending copyright by 20 years passed in 1998, musicians including Bob Dylan were among the key figures who had implored Congress to act. Younger generations of musicians, who came up awash in sampling and remixing, made no discernible outcry for another extension. In part, this could be because, in the streaming era, many of them do not make that much money from recorded music.
Jimmy Tamborello, who records and performs electronic music under the name Dntel and as part of The Postal Service — a group whose very name caused trademark headaches with the official version at its inception — said that artists are generally happy to allow others to turn their work into new things. The problem is companies that come between them, and get most of the financial benefit.
“There’s always a corporation involved,” Tamborello said. “I think no one would care if it was just artists to artists. I feel like it would be nice if it was more open, more free. It seems like it has more to do with respecting the original work.”
He says it was “really exciting” when the rapper Lil Peep used his hook from The Postal Service’s best-known song, Such Great Heights, on a track released on YouTube and Soundcloud even before he made the proper legal arrangements to use it on an album.
Johnston says age and experience have made him feel less possessive about his work.
“Earlier in my career, everything was an affront. Everything made me angry and like, ‘That was that was my idea! I should have had credit for that!’” he says. “I don’t want to say I’m just easy and breezy about it, but I think there are so few truly original ideas. We all kind of will have similar thoughts at a certain point. So it doesn’t particularly bother me.”
His attitude changes if the re-maker is not an artist but artificial intelligence (AI). That was a key issue in last year’s Hollywood writers and actors strikes — and is yet another facet of remix culture that, alongside copyright expirations, could change the faces of some of history’s most renowned characters in ways no one has ever considered.
“If a writer feels for me, it’s fine,” Johnston says. “If an AI steals from me, that sucks.”
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
The bird flu outbreak at US dairy farms keeps finding alarming new ways to surprise scientists. Last week, the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) confirmed that H5N1 is spreading not just from birds to herds, but among cows. Meanwhile, media reports say that an unknown number of cows are asymptomatic. Although the risk to humans is still low, it is clear that far more work needs to be done to get a handle on the reach of the virus and how it is being transmitted. That would require the USDA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to get
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
On April 11, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida delivered a speech at a joint meeting of the US Congress in Washington, in which he said that “China’s current external stance and military actions present an unprecedented and the greatest strategic challenge … to the peace and stability of the international community.” Kishida emphasized Japan’s role as “the US’ closest ally.” “The international order that the US worked for generations to build is facing new challenges,” Kishida said. “I understand it is a heavy burden to carry such hopes on your shoulders,” he said. “Japan is already standing shoulder to shoulder