The US’ youngest-ever elected president, John F. Kennedy, put civic duty at the heart of his 1961 call to “ask what you can do for your country.” Today’s leaders are trying to drum up the same spirit among young people, especially in Europe where the war in Ukraine has 40-something leaders such as Estonian Prime Minister Kaja Kallas extending conscription and French President Emmanuel Macron calling for civic rearmament.
However, let us not forget to ask older generations, such as the retiring baby-boomer cohort that might have grown up listening to Kennedy’s speech, to do their bit. They are also likely to need to accept sacrifices as the era of the “peace dividend” gives way to a paradigm shift in defense investment that could saddle G7 countries with an extra US$10 trillion in spending by 2034.
The narrative of generational inequality is well-traveled, with stacks of books telling how boomers bequeathed misery to their millennial children. Saddled with student debt, the young suffered stagnating wages and were denied the rites of passage of home ownership and parenthood while their own parents accumulated wealth.
Illustration: Mountain People
It is a narrative that has slightly softened in the past few years as wages rise, unemployment falls and overvalued houses become a bit more affordable.
Yet the UK and continental Europe’s generational divides still look very stark after the COVID-19 pandemic and as the Ukraine war grinds on. Young workers who became a hot commodity after lockdown face a cooling labor market and stalling economic growth, even as talk of rearmament delivers record orders for the likes of Germany’s Rheinmetall AG and brings military service back to dinner-table conversation.
Home-ownership levels have started to bounce back, but not enough to close the generational divide. Declining birthrates also highlight how having children is increasingly a choice seen as unaffordable by millennials.
Meanwhile, social spending is still geared toward the retirees and boomers who were most protected during the pandemic and who have the most wealth, which partly explains why cruise ships are bracing for another record-breaking year. In the UK, pension protections such as the triple lock and cuts to working-age benefits collectively mean non-pensioners are more than ￡2,200 (US$2,736) a year worse off on average since 2010, while pensioners are less than ￡200 a year worse off, the Resolution Foundation has said.
In France, despite Macron’s abortive attempts to rebalance taxation in favor of workers, pensioners had a better standard of living than workers going into the pandemic.
At a time when extra military spending is rekindling the “guns or butter” question — namely, at what point governments will have to cut social spending to fund defense — it should again be asked whether all generations are ready to make sacrifices. Capping or curbing overall welfare spending will not make the system fairer for those who governments are trying to persuade to don military fatigues or reverse declining birthrates; boomers would still be the net beneficiaries.
Even without adding defense into the mix, the implied future cost of payouts such as pensions is rising from one generation to the next: This “intertemporal budget gap” stood at 251 percent of GDP for the EU in 2019, a European Commission paper said.
Shifting to a pro-youth playbook means reallocating priorities: making homes more affordable, by expanding supply and not just subsidizing an unequal market; encouraging parenthood by expanding childcare, but also creating more jobs that do not discriminate against parenthood; prioritizing education and research; and lump-sum payments to young people instead of ring-fencing pension payouts.
“Pensioners have a higher standard of living than workers... They should be made to pay,” Jacques Attali, 80, former adviser to former French president Francois Mitterrand, said last week.
Pundits are likely to reply, with some justification, that pro-youth policies are not implemented because young people do not vote.
Yet wars transform societies. They create political awakenings, lead to better-organized societies and fund discoveries such as penicillin or the Internet — offset, of course, by the death and violence they cause.
Latvian Prime Minister Evika Silina recently told the Munich Security Conference that, after Russia’s annexation of Crimea, her country’s subsequent ramping-up of defense spending had been “easy to explain,” even if the preference would have been to focus on making pensions more generous.
This is a time of collective action, and the spirit of Kennedy’s quote should live on — all the more so as US President Joe Biden, the oldest leader in the country’s history, prepares to take on a fellow boomer, former US president Donald Trump.
Lionel Laurent is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist writing about the future of money and the future of Europe. Previously, he was a reporter for Reuters and Forbes.
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
In an article published in Newsweek on Monday last week, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged China to retake territories it lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. “If it is really for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t China take back Russia?” Lai asked, referring to territories lost in 1858 and 1860. The territories once made up the two flanks of northern Manchuria. Once ceded to Russia, they became part of the Russian far east. Claims since then have been made that China and Russia settled the disputes in the 1990s through the 2000s and that “China
Trips to the Kenting Peninsula in Pingtung County have dredged up a lot of public debate and furor, with many complaints about how expensive and unreasonable lodging is. Some people even call it a tourist “butchering ground.” Many local business owners stake claims to beach areas by setting up parasols and driving away people who do not rent them. The managing authority for the area — Kenting National Park — has long ignored the issue. Ultimately, this has affected the willingness of domestic travelers to go there, causing tourist numbers to plummet. In 2008, Taiwan opened the door to Chinese tourists and in
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je’s (柯文哲) arrest is a significant development. He could have become president or vice president on a shared TPP-Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) ticket and could have stood again in 2028. If he is found guilty, there would be little chance of that, but what of his party? What about the third force in Taiwanese politics? What does this mean for the disenfranchised young people who he attracted, and what does it mean for his ambitious and ideologically fickle right-hand man, TPP caucus leader Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌)? Ko and Huang have been appealing to that
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
RSS