Taiwan values hard work and is an exciting, young democracy. This month, it has an opportunity to keep moving forward in its progressive political journey.
Taiwan ranks higher on The Economist Intelligence Unit’s Democracy Index than any other country in Asia and is second in Asia on Freedom House’s list of free countries. Its rankings on both indices are higher than those of my country, the US, which is often seen as a model.
I have been inspired by my friends in the Taiwanese human rights community who take full advantage of the open civic space to champion national human rights causes, and provide needed solidarity and support to activists struggling in less open societies in the region.
Taiwan is becoming internationally known for making sensible public policy. My friends and family were deeply worried for my safety when they saw news of the earthquake last week. It registered at 7.2 on the Richter scale, which would have left a greater trail of destruction and a higher death toll in many other countries. However, Taiwan’s policies, implemented since the devastating 921 Earthquake, made it well-prepared.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, Taiwan showed the world what sound public health policy could look like. My own country saw more than 1 million deaths, with a 5.7 percent mortality rate compared with Taiwan’s 0.186 percent. Decisions in the US were clouded by a highly chaotic and politically charged debate about basic public health measures that no one questioned in Taiwan.
This month, Taiwan has a significant opportunity regarding sensible public policy and international human rights norms. The Constitutional Court is evaluating the constitutionality of the death penalty. Only 27 percent of the world’s countries have retained this punishment for ordinary crimes. Most of these have authoritarian regimes, with the US being a major outlier.
In my 15 years working for Amnesty International in the US, I have witnessed how the death penalty is a blight on any country that aligns itself with human rights. Its staying power primarily comes from politicians’ ability to manipulate the public’s fears, rather than from any proven impact on deterring violent crime or delivering justice without deadly errors and bias. After a few decades of discovering an incredible number of innocence cases, the clamor to execute prisoners has become less loud.
High-profile murder cases in Taiwan predictably result in cries for the death penalty, amplified by a media that provokes drama. With 0.8 murders in 100,000 compared with 7 in 100,000 in the US, I would argue that Taiwan does not have a serious violent crime problem, despite the tragedy it is to the loved ones of the victims.
Regardless of how you view violent crime in Taiwan, the US has proven that capital punishment does not lower murder rates and is a distraction from tangible services that could better help devastated victims’ families. The international community has increasingly been turning its back on the death penalty given its contradiction of the right to life, to be free from cruel and inhumane punishment and to be treated equally under the law.
Taiwan is at a crossroads. It has chosen to let the judicial system evaluate the death penalty. Now, it can rationally and objectively look at the system without inflammatory cries for vengeance or factually inaccurate claims about its utility.
The court has a momentous opportunity to evaluate whether a democracy with a Constitution that enshrines human rights can accommodate a practice that no longer aligns with international human rights norms. Should it decide that the death penalty is incompatible with the values of a liberal democracy, perhaps my country would take notice of yet another example of Taiwan leading in sound public policy.
Laura Moye is a human rights activist and teacher living in Taichung.
Life as we know it will probably not come to an end in Japan this weekend, but what if it does? That is the question consuming a disaster-prone country ahead of a widely spread prediction of disaster that one comic book suggests would occur tomorrow. The Future I Saw, a manga by Ryo Tatsuki about her purported ability to see the future in dreams, was first published in 1999. It would have faded into obscurity, but for the mention of a tsunami and the cover that read “Major disaster in March 2011.” Years later, when the most powerful earthquake ever
Chinese intimidation of Taiwan has entered a chilling new phase: bolder, more multifaceted and unconstrained by diplomatic norms. For years, Taiwan has weathered economic coercion, military threats, diplomatic isolation, political interference, espionage and disinformation, but the direct targeting of elected leaders abroad signals an alarming escalation in Beijing’s campaign of hostility. Czech military intelligence recently uncovered a plot that reads like fiction, but is all too real. Chinese diplomats and civil secret service in Prague had planned to ram the motorcade of then-vice president-elect Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) and physically assault her during her visit to the Czech Republic in March last
Cosmetics have long been one of the “golden pillars” of revenue for department stores in Taiwan. With rows of beauty counters and a full lineup of brands, they once served as a powerful draw for customers. However, since last year, the halo surrounding the sector has begun to fade. It is not an isolated issue affecting one retailer — it is a widespread phenomenon across department stores in Taiwan. Department store executives admit that business is tough, but they also stress that the root cause is not a drop in Taiwan’s spending power or a surge in outbound travel. Instead, a
As things heated up in the Middle East in early June, some in the Pentagon resisted American involvement in the Israel-Iran war because it would divert American attention and resources from the real challenge: China. This was exactly wrong. Rather, bombing Iran was the best thing that could have happened for America’s Asia policy. When it came to dealing with the Iranian nuclear program, “all options are on the table” had become an American mantra over the past two decades. But the more often US administration officials insisted that military force was in the cards, the less anyone believed it. After
RSS