The magnitude 7.2 (ML) earthquake that struck Taiwan at 7.58am early on Wednesday morning was the largest earthquake in Taiwan in a quarter of a century. It brought to mind the 921 Earthquake in 1999 that had caused major power outages throughout the nation.
The two earthquakes had different epicenters, but were of similar magnitude.
However, looked at in terms of the impact on the electricity supply, the two earthquakes were very different, which is a measure of the many improvements that had been put in place since the Sept. 21, 1999, quake.
Wednesday’s earthquake impacted the supply from several generators and power lines belonging to independent power producers and Taiwan Power Co (Taipower), but the overall power supply continued to operate as normal.
More than 350,000 households nationwide experienced power outages, but the supply had been returned to more than 95 percent of users by noon on that day.
There are two main reasons the supply shortages caused by an earthquake of this magnitude could be reinstated in such a short time and the service resumed almost seamlessly.
The first was that the grid energy storage system was able to respond quickly; the second was that other power sources, such as from pumped storage hydropower, solar power and gas, were able to quickly make up the shortfall.
This shows the importance and effectiveness of the green energy sources developed over the past few years.
This shows the importance, in addition to the effectiveness of the green energy sources developed over the past few years, of the Grid Resilience Strengthening Construction Plan (強化電網韌性建設計畫) that Taipower has announced, in which it expects to invest NT$564.5 billion (US$17.6 billion) over a decade.
The investment is to be spent on a number of projects designed to comprehensively upgrade the national electrical grid system, including decentralization, expansion and modernization of the grid, increasing the amount of storage equipment and enhancing resilience to prevent the spread of power outages.
These projects are to be implemented to enable Taipower to respond to sudden events and maintain a stable power supply.
Despite the significant cost of the plan, the investment is needed. Wednesday’s earthquake was similar in magnitude to the 921 Earthquake of 25 years ago, and yet the impact was significantly reduced.
This was due in no small part to the resilience of Taiwan, but also shows how the grid resilience enhancements are gradually starting to pay dividends.
I have consistently emphasized nuclear power safety issues, in terms of Taiwan’s dense population, the geological situation and the risk of human error.
All of which make the risk of nuclear power considerably high and could potentially cause unimaginable environmental costs.
This recent earthquake once more shows that Taiwanese cannot be complacent in the face of the power of nature.
An earthquake is over in a matter of seconds, but its repercussions could be felt for several decades.
The changes Taipower is introducing to the energy storage system, the national grid facilities and the inbuilt resilience and responsiveness all contribute to reducing the impact on the power supply, and they are to be applauded.
Chen Ping-hei is a distinguished professor at National Taiwan University.
Translated by Paul Cooper
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is leading a delegation to China through Sunday. She is expected to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing tomorrow. That date coincides with the anniversary of the signing of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), which marked a cornerstone of Taiwan-US relations. Staging their meeting on this date makes it clear that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) intends to challenge the US and demonstrate its “authority” over Taiwan. Since the US severed official diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1979, it has relied on the TRA as a legal basis for all
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
RSS