Last summer, then-Legislative Yuan secretary-general Lin Chih-chia (林志嘉) led a delegation to the Czech Republic and Austria for a study tour of their parliaments. In its report, the delegation specifically mentioned that “the issue of construction expansion of the legislative building is yet to be negotiated between the government and the opposition in order to forge a consensus.”
Comparing parliamentary buildings in the Czech Republic and Austria with the legislative building in Taiwan, the delegation said that “the current site of the Legislative Yuan used to be Taipei Second Girls’ High School originally during the Japanese colonial era… The existing space was not designed for parliamentary purposes, and it has long outgrown its utility and is not in conformity with the use of the site today.”
It continued: “Moreover, there are illegally built facilities and part of the site occupies a section that is planned to be used for a road. There is also a lack of space for the public to express their opinions and protests, not to mention the difficulties in renovation and maintenance.”
Article 63 of the Constitution states: “The Legislative Yuan shall have the power to decide by resolution upon statutory or budgetary bills or bills concerning martial law, amnesty, declaration of war, conclusion of peace or treaties, and other important affairs of the State.”
The Legislative Yuan is the meeting place of public opinion, and yet it is in an old school building, which is used as office space and legislative venues for the legislature. Such a state of affairs is, frankly, an embarrassment.
The legislators of the 11th Legislative Yuan took their oath of office in February. In recent months, lawmakers have made more than 300 legislative proposals — including amendments to the Legislative Yuan Organizational Act (立法院組織法), the Legislative Yuan Power Exercise Act (立法院職權行使法) and the Legislator Conduct Act (立法委員行為法), which are about to enter the deliberation stage.
Regrettably, it seems that not much attention has been paid to this old issue of legislative building expansion. It is already 24 years into the new millennium and yet the Legislative Yuan still operates by renting an old building, registered as a school of the Taipei City Government.
The Ministry of National Defense is spending as much as NT$5.4 billion (US$169 million) to build a national military museum in Taipei’s Dazhi (大直) area. Who knows how much interest there will be in the museum after construction is completed next year? However, the Legislative Yuan is heavily responsible for reviewing the central government’s budget of more than NT$2 trillion every year. It should have the office space befitting of the highest hall for public opinion.
Instead of fighting over the issue, the ruling and opposition camps could consider repurposing the Dazhi museum as Taiwan’s “capitol hill.” This could not only save taxpayers’ money, but also fulfill the need for a new legislative hall.
Lo Cheng-chung is a professor and director of Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology’s Institute of Financial and Economic Law.
Translated by Eddy Chang
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then