A wildfire of transnational Internet fraud is sweeping across the world, causing growing financial losses for many countries. Following the world’s first Global Fraud Summit in the UK last month, the Taiwan-based Global Cooperation and Training Framework invited delegates from the UK, the US, Australia and other states to take part in its 2024 International Workshop on Combating Transnational Fraud from Monday to Wednesday last week in Taipei.
Hopefully, this workshop can contribute to expanding countries’ ability to fight fraud and achieving the vision of multilateral cooperation to combat it.
Data provided by British representatives at the workshop showed that the majority of fraud cases in the UK originated abroad and 80 percent of them were perpetrated via the Internet. As a result, 70 percent of money stolen through fraud flows abroad, which has had a serious impact on the UK’s economy. To address the problem, the UK on Oct. 26 last year promulgated the Online Safety Act to control online activity, while at the same time bolstering oversight of financial and corporate entities by requiring banks’ and companies’ supervisory departments to fulfill their responsibility to safeguard and manage their customers.
Among the four aspects from which Taiwan wages its war against fraud, cooperation between police and the financial sector has seen the most impressive results. Last year, their joint efforts blocked NT$8.99 billion (US$280 million) in fraud-related money transfers. However, amid this global wave of fraud, NT$8.8 billion was still lost to scammers.
Like the UK and other states, Taiwan has to contend with the difficulty of supervising the Internet and social media. At the start of this year, Taiwanese police, through cross-border cooperation with their US counterparts, cracked a fraud syndicate controlled by the Mingren Society — a faction of the Bamboo Union gang. An analysis of this case showed that fraud syndicates in Taiwan start by setting up bogus companies that pretend to offer investment services in securities and virtual currencies. Next, the syndicates use their criminal associates who work in advertising firms to use those companies’ accounts to place online adverts on platforms such as Facebook and YouTube.
Gang members then concoct scam sales pitches. The syndicates hire technicians such as computer programmers to design Web sites, apps and investment frameworks modeled on the original frameworks of systems integrators.
Finally, they use US domain names to set up investment Web sites that are hard to detect because they are overseas. Their mode of operation is quite similar to the criminal structures described by the UK, the US and other governments.
Judging from the exchanges that took place at the workshop, it is clear that fraud syndicates are riding the digital wave by making widespread use of social media and network technology. They hide behind their keyboards and might even take advantage of the difficulty of cross-border cooperation to cut off counter-fraud operations by going abroad and hiding in other countries. Internet fraud has thus become a low-risk, high-profit new model of global crime for which the culprits risk only relatively light prison sentences.
Internet fraud has become an important issue that is also one of the most difficult for countries to regulate. Judging by the experiences of regulation and governance shared by countries at the workshop, it is apparent that to effectively control fraud, a framework of Internet-related laws and management must first be established. Beyond that, it is necessary to strengthen supervision of the financial sector and business corporations, while also establishing transnational cooperation. Only through the synergistic effect of these measures is it possible to effectively combat fraud.
The fight against fraud is a global one. British statistics showed that more than 30 countries have adjusted their corporate law to include the registration and supervisory requirements that are needed to strengthen the fight against fraudulent activities. They have also taken the equally important step of enacting online safety laws.
Taiwan can draw on the UK’s experience in fighting fraud by enacting digital network management laws and bolstering supervision of corporate law. Only through the effective supervision of the business sector can it have the necessary intelligence and information to exchange with other countries, strengthening the transnational fight against fraud.
Lin Shu-li holds a doctorate from Central Police University.
Translated by Julian Clegg
The bird flu outbreak at US dairy farms keeps finding alarming new ways to surprise scientists. Last week, the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) confirmed that H5N1 is spreading not just from birds to herds, but among cows. Meanwhile, media reports say that an unknown number of cows are asymptomatic. Although the risk to humans is still low, it is clear that far more work needs to be done to get a handle on the reach of the virus and how it is being transmitted. That would require the USDA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to get
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
The victory of Vice President William Lai (賴清德) in January’s presidential election raised questions about the future of China’s unification strategy toward Taiwan. A decade ago, the assumption in Bejing had been that deepening economic ties with Taiwan would bring about a political accommodation eventually leading to political integration. Not only has this not happened, but it hastened the opposite. Taiwanese are more concerned with safeguarding their political independence than they have ever been. China’s preferred party, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), has not won a presidential election since 2012. Clearly, Beijing’s strategy is not working. Polling conducted by the Institute of European