The growing popularity of exchange-traded funds (ETFs) among investors in Taiwan has led to a rapid increase in the size of such funds at a five-year compound growth rate of 39 percent, the highest in the world, with total ETF assets reaching NT$4.04 trillion (US$126.4 billion) at the end of January, trailing only Japan and China in Asia, recent reports issued by JP Morgan Asset Management Ltd and the Securities Investment Trust and Consulting Association showed.
The ETF frenzy has prompted many of the nation’s fund managers to continue issuing new products over the past few months, with two new ETFs — the Yuanta Taiwan Value High Dividend ETF (coded 00940) and UPAMC Taiwan High Dividend Momentum ETF (coded 00939) — even sparking a rush among retail investors and causing several securities firms to suspend new subscriptions. The central bank and the Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) have also stepped up warnings on investors’ irrational behavior and potential risk.
Eyeing potential product and market risks associated with ETFs, the FSC has implemented six regulatory measures aimed at enhancing product structure, improving data transparency and increasing liquidity for ETFs. However, these measures stop short of introducing caps on how much could be raised by a single ETF, as equity ETFs still represent a relatively small portion of total equity market capitalization in Taiwan, the commission said.
Meanwhile, Fitch Ratings Inc said that continued growth in Taiwanese domestic equity ETFs, especially those focusing on high-dividend or technology stocks, could lead to increased market volatility during a rally or sell-off in ETFs’ constituent stocks, or result in excess valuation for a concentrated portfolio of equities as investors rush to buy constituent stocks on the local bourse directly.
Investment experts are also increasingly worried that some equity ETFs might become a speculative target rather than a long-term investment tool amid retail investors’ buying spree.
The frenzy around Taiwan’s ETFs also highlights a fundamental problem: that the nation has a high level of excess savings, defined as gross savings exceeding gross investment. Too much extra savings indicate that the nation’s private consumption and investment remains tepid, a situation that demands a government response.
The Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics last month revised upward its estimate for excess savings to NT$3.84 trillion for this year, higher than its previous estimate of NT$3.7 trillion made in November last year and expanding from NT$3.31 trillion last year. This year’s excess savings rate is projected to hit 15.46 percent, the highest in three years, the agency said.
If Taiwanese businesses and consumers remain reluctant to invest or spend in the domestic market to stimulate the economy, such money would either go overseas to finance investments in other countries or swarm into domestic ETFs or the real-estate market. Taiwanese investors’ continual attraction to ETFs might also suggest they remain interested in long-term financial management, hoping to accumulate wealth for their retirement.
The central bank suggested various solutions to address this problem, such as increasing private-sector participation in public construction projects, guiding private funds to develop innovative financial services and wealth management businesses, and encouraging firms to use excess savings on cross-border mergers and acquisitions.
However, the effects seem limited and government agencies must work harder to tackle this issue. If new investment opportunities could be opened up in the economy, more highly paid jobs could be provided, which means funds would not simply flow into ETFs and the real-estate market.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS