Open-source software might well be the greatest “public good” the market economy has ever produced. What it shows is the power of voluntary social cooperation.
Standard neoclassical economic theory holds that goods and services with widespread benefits get produced only if their maker can charge customers for them.
Open-source software — defined as “something people can modify and share because its design is publicly accessible” — unquestionably has widespread benefits, yet it is free. Think of the Mozilla Firefox browser, VLC Media Player, the Python programming language or Linux-based operating systems. Many companies, including Meta and Mistral, are pioneering open-source artificial intelligence (AI).
A new estimate from researchers at Harvard and the University of Toronto found that the worldwide value of all open-source software is about US$8.8 trillion. To place that in perspective, about US$3.4 trillion was spent on commercial software globally in 2020. The US$8.8 trillion figure is more than double the current gross domestic product of India at current market exchange rates. It is almost triple the latest market capitalizations of Apple and Microsoft. All the gold in the world is worth more than US$13 trillion, give or take.
The new estimate comes from a recalculation of the benefits from the demand side. Previous studies tended to look at the replacement cost for open-source software — that is, what it would cost to hire people to rewrite what is currently free. Using this method, the paper estimates the value of open-source software at about US$4.15 trillion.
The new research, conducted with support from the Linux Foundation, looks at the benefit to those who use software: If a given piece of open-source software is of use to millions, its actual value would register as many times higher than its cost. Thus the revised estimate of US$8.8 trillion.
Why do people contribute to open-source projects? Their motives vary. Some might wish to show off their programming skills to increase their value on the job market. Others might simply believe in open-source as a philosophy, as a means of doing good for the world. Belonging to a community of open-source contributors can also bring concrete benefits, such as a valuable professional network or just camaraderie. In other cases, open-source contributors need the software for their own use, and thus they find it worthwhile to contribute to its production.
The overall lesson is clear: There are many different ways to make a system work, not all of them directly commercial.
Yet even this US$8.8 trillion estimate understates the benefits of open-source software. By putting open-source in the market, it ensures that commercial producers have to “compete against free.” That leads them to lower their prices, which in turn allows more people to buy the closed-source products. Open-source also forestalls the possibility of complete monopoly in the market, since there is an open-source alternative. From a production standpoint, open-source software also lowers costs, since commercial producers can learn from and even copy its programming ideas.
It is difficult to estimate of the size of these benefits. However, it is reasonable to believe they are large, and could grow as open-source services spread.
And open-source would almost certainly play a big role in the development of AI software. Many people would want to work with AI services that they can customize and tweak to their preferred ends. Even if the producers cannot charge for it, it can be issued, iterated and improved at a rapid rate. It might also be easier to fix bugs and hacks in an open-source product.
Since last year, the EU has been debating whether it should ban open-source large-language models and other forms of AI. That movement appears to have lost legislative momentum, but it is a sign that open-source approaches are not sufficiently appreciated. The fear is that open-source AI could be commandeered by bad people and bad institutions — but this is an issue with many new technologies, not just AI. Open-source products have a greater potential to improve safety and innovation than they do to enable wrongdoing.
At the broadest level, not to get too metaphysical, the open-source idea undergirds much of human civilization. Good governance itself, for example, is more like an open-source project than anything proprietary. Beneficial ethical norms also have strong open-source components. By properly valuing open-source software, we are simply reaffirming the many benefits of human cooperation. That is something to feel good about.
Tyler Cowen is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist, a professor of economics at George Mason University and host of the “Marginal Revolution” blog. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
The bird flu outbreak at US dairy farms keeps finding alarming new ways to surprise scientists. Last week, the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) confirmed that H5N1 is spreading not just from birds to herds, but among cows. Meanwhile, media reports say that an unknown number of cows are asymptomatic. Although the risk to humans is still low, it is clear that far more work needs to be done to get a handle on the reach of the virus and how it is being transmitted. That would require the USDA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to get
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
On April 11, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida delivered a speech at a joint meeting of the US Congress in Washington, in which he said that “China’s current external stance and military actions present an unprecedented and the greatest strategic challenge … to the peace and stability of the international community.” Kishida emphasized Japan’s role as “the US’ closest ally.” “The international order that the US worked for generations to build is facing new challenges,” Kishida said. “I understand it is a heavy burden to carry such hopes on your shoulders,” he said. “Japan is already standing shoulder to shoulder