Sora, a new service from OpenAI that produces one-minute videos in response to a textual prompt, is not yet available to the public. However, the videos it has released are striking for their vividness, detail and — if this is the correct term for artificial intelligence (AI) — imagination.
It is worth considering the future economic consequences of this development.
First, Sora is unlikely to put Hollywood out of business. Eventually these videos could get much longer, but it remains to be seen how well AI can construct long story arcs and integrate them with images into a commercially appealing package. That still seems a long way off, and cost is an additional consideration.
The more clear and present danger to Hollywood is that would-be viewers might start making their own short videos rather than watching television. “Show my pet dog Fido flying to Mars and building a space colony there” is perhaps more fun than a TV show to many.
Sora and comparable services could lead to a proliferation of short educational videos, internal corporate training videos and just plain fooling around. Sora would probably be good for TikTok and other short video services. It is not hard to imagine services that splice your Sora-constructed videos into your TikTok productions. So if you are doing BookTok, for example, maybe you put a battle re-enactment in the background of your plug for your new book on the US Civil War.
Perhaps the most significant short-run use of these videos might be for advertising — especially Internet advertising. Again, there is the question of how to integrate narrative, but the costs of creating new ads is likely to fall.
More advertising might sound like a mixed blessing. However, ads would almost certainly be more fun and creative than they are now. Watching ads might become its own aesthetic avocation, as is already the case for Super Bowl ads. These ads also might be targeted, rather than serving a mass audience. If your Internet history suggests you are interested in unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP), for example, perhaps you might see ads with aliens telling you which soap to buy.
Some other implications of Sora are more subtle and more speculative. There is the notion that Sora has been trained on “synthetic data,” for example, which means other videos created by AI, rather than videos of real life. To the extent that is true, future AI progress might be to some extent liberated from constraints of data. AI tools might be in essence able to teach themselves, which would accelerate AI progress even more.
To the extent synthetic data proves important, it might weaken the moats of Meta and Google, which have access to significant stores of data through Facebook, Instagram, YouTube and other services. That would give start-ups and smaller AI companies more of a competitive chance. On the other hand, the rising demand for computation — to produce and work with the synthetic data — would strengthen the market valuation of Nvidia and other companies selling the proper kinds of chips.
It is also interesting to think of Sora as a new way of modeling physical systems. Its presentation of physics and geometry is by no means perfect (though likely to improve), but it is already good enough to fool the typical human eye. Whatever methods were used to model the physical systems of our world seem to apply quite generally, keep in mind that OpenAI has not explained how it created Sora.
In any case, those methods might someday contribute to building better models in physics, chemistry and engineering, and could accelerate scientific progress as well as economic productivity.
Finally, Sora is yet more evidence that, in AI, progress in images is proceeding more rapidly than progress in text. GPT-4 has now been out for well over a year, and it remains to be seen how much better its successors could be. In that same period of time, image and video production has made amazing strides. It was not so long ago that people used to complain that AI image services could not portray human hands convincingly. If progress in images continues to outpace progress in text, then maybe that old saying has it backwards: A word is worth 1,000 pictures. Or, to put it another way, words are more truly “human” than images.
At the most speculative level, the success of Sora might increase the chance that we are living in a simulation — a computer-based world created by some high-powered being, whether a deity or aliens. Is that bullish or bearish for asset prices? It depends on how you assess the responsibility and ethics of the creator. At the very least, our planet Earth simulator seems to be able to generate videos that last longer than a single minute. Beyond that, I cannot say.
Tyler Cowen is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist, a professor of economics at George Mason University and host of the “Marginal Revolution” blog. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That