The Ministry of Education on Friday said that vocational schools and senior-high high schools can trial allowing students to take mental health days off starting next month.
Since National Sun Yat-sen University first introduced “mental unwellness leave” in 2022, many colleges and universities embraced the policy, and 43 schools are to offer students mental health leave in the new semester starting this month.
The ministry on Monday last week released official guidelines for mental health leave at colleges and universities, stating that the purpose is to help students pay attention to mental health, while schools should initiate care measures, including counseling and referrals.
The guidelines also suggested allowing students to take a half or full day of leave for up to three days per semester.
A petition initiated by the Taiwan Youth Association for Democracy to introduce mental health leave in junior and senior-high schools garnered more than 3,000 student signatures in one day.
High-school and vocational high-school students must provide proof of a parent or guardian’s consent to take mental health leave, and those who take the leave are not eligible for perfect attendance, the ministry said.
In the 2022-2023 school year, more than 29,000 mental health days were taken by students at 11 universities. The association on Friday said that its survey showed that up to 90 percent of young people say leave would have a positive effect on their mental health. Several university presidents have praised the policy as supportive to students’ mental well-being.
The changes indicate that policymakers and schools are recognizing the importance of letting young people take time off to care for their mental health, but further measures must follow, especially as the policy is to be tested in high schools.
Parents, teachers and administrators need more guidance on how to provide support to students in need while protecting their privacy and preventing stigmatization, as it is generally harder at high school than it is at university to take time off without an absence being noticed by classmates.
Schools might need to train teachers and staff to identify signs of mental distress and develop strategies to follow up on students who take leave to see if additional support is needed, but not force them to accept counseling or make them feel more stressed from unwanted attention.
Moreover, students might need more help to find resources and support to meet their emotional needs, so effective mental health leave will require the participation of parents and guardians, as leaving a struggling teenager at home alone to play video games or sink into social media is unlikely to be beneficial and might even be risky if they are depressed or have suicidal thoughts.
While taking a mental health day can be a warning signal that a student might need help, many parents also need assistance to tell when they should let their child take a day off, to talk to their child to better understand their emotional needs and to decide whether taking a day off is the best solution and not just an excuse to skip a test, hide from conflict or catch up on overdue assignments.
They might also need guidance on how to help their child spend the mental health day or when to consult a mental health professional if they suspect their child’s condition is chronic or severe.
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission