Native language education became normalized in elementary schools in 2002. It has been a policy for 22 years, even with its idling during the eight years of former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration. It has been an interesting ride since the curriculum’s inception. Taiwan is a multicultural society, and respecting its diverse linguistic cultures has become a widespread value in its modern democracy.
Political power shifted back to homegrown political parties in 2016, and in 2019, the Development of National Languages Act (國家語言發展法) promoted by the Ministry of Culture was passed and implemented. The ministry also confirmed which native languages were listed as choices in the compulsory curriculum for junior high and high schools, including various indigenous languages — Hakka, Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), Minnanese localized to Matsu Island and other islets in Lienchiang County, as well as Taiwanese sign language. The policy has been fully rolled out since the first week of the 2022 academic year. News of its implementation was exciting, as it had been a focal point for several Taiwan-focused cultural and education-related civic groups, and specialized academics and volunteers, having undergone countless back-and-forth struggles that ultimately passed with the cooperation of government authorities and organizations.
To this end, all of Taiwan’s native languages are legally considered national languages with their official status and rights guaranteed, and they are taught starting from elementary school all the way through to high school.
So, what is the reality of the education landscape for the junior high and high school native language curriculum, which has only been implemented for just over a year?
What needs attention first and foremost is the glaring issue of teacher credentials. Native language teachers mainly consist of part-time instructors and teaching support staff who have obtained intermediate to advanced-level language certifications and full-time instructors who hold native language instruction certifications and licenses. Despite the establishment of university-level extended education credits for native language instruction, due to the sparse number of instructors out there and even the screening of incoming instructors, fully fleshed-out expertise is difficult to cultivate. Even if teachers are completely devoted to passing on their native languages, it is difficult for them to develop their expertise, leading to a waste of human resources.
Second, the curriculum material tends to be difficult. As there is a three-year junior high school gap between elementary schools and high schools, and students might have to choose a different native language or take new immigrant language courses such as Vietnamese or Indonesian, differing from what they previously studied, it could be impossible to connect the knowledge gap for some students. Add on that there are few standardized tests for native language coursework, and some learning materials lack a connection to daily life, leaving instructors frustrated. The government as well as publishers could effectively target and improve upon this dearth of materials.
Although the government’s complementary measures leave a bit to be desired, we are still resolutely determined that it should realize equality and the protection of our endangered languages and cultures. We cannot sit on our thumbs waiting until the 11th hour for all the parts to come together to implement these measures. Elementary school-level native language education has been in effect for 22 years; the present system is already well-matured. We just need to put faith in junior high and high school native language instruction to mirror the layout of the elementary school-level curriculum, gradually moving it toward perfection.
Looking to the future, the government could comprehensively implement all stipulated contents of the act, fix the shortage of instructors and materials as soon as possible, and provide opportunities for native language instructors to hone their acumen so as to fill in the present shortage of instructors, further breathing more life into Taiwan’s native languages.
Ng Siu-lin is deputy director of the Northern Taiwan Society
Translated by Tim Smith
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
Xiaomi Corp founder Lei Jun (雷軍) on May 22 made a high-profile announcement, giving online viewers a sneak peek at the company’s first 3-nanometer mobile processor — the Xring O1 chip — and saying it is a breakthrough in China’s chip design history. Although Xiaomi might be capable of designing chips, it lacks the ability to manufacture them. No matter how beautifully planned the blueprints are, if they cannot be mass-produced, they are nothing more than drawings on paper. The truth is that China’s chipmaking efforts are still heavily reliant on the free world — particularly on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
Last week, Nvidia chief executive officer Jensen Huang (黃仁勳) unveiled the location of Nvidia’s new Taipei headquarters and announced plans to build the world’s first large-scale artificial intelligence (AI) supercomputer in Taiwan. In Taipei, Huang’s announcement was welcomed as a milestone for Taiwan’s tech industry. However, beneath the excitement lies a significant question: Can Taiwan’s electricity infrastructure, especially its renewable energy supply, keep up with growing demand from AI chipmaking? Despite its leadership in digital hardware, Taiwan lags behind in renewable energy adoption. Moreover, the electricity grid is already experiencing supply shortages. As Taiwan’s role in AI manufacturing expands, it is critical that
RSS