Native language education became normalized in elementary schools in 2002. It has been a policy for 22 years, even with its idling during the eight years of former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration. It has been an interesting ride since the curriculum’s inception. Taiwan is a multicultural society, and respecting its diverse linguistic cultures has become a widespread value in its modern democracy.
Political power shifted back to homegrown political parties in 2016, and in 2019, the Development of National Languages Act (國家語言發展法) promoted by the Ministry of Culture was passed and implemented. The ministry also confirmed which native languages were listed as choices in the compulsory curriculum for junior high and high schools, including various indigenous languages — Hakka, Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), Minnanese localized to Matsu Island and other islets in Lienchiang County, as well as Taiwanese sign language. The policy has been fully rolled out since the first week of the 2022 academic year. News of its implementation was exciting, as it had been a focal point for several Taiwan-focused cultural and education-related civic groups, and specialized academics and volunteers, having undergone countless back-and-forth struggles that ultimately passed with the cooperation of government authorities and organizations.
To this end, all of Taiwan’s native languages are legally considered national languages with their official status and rights guaranteed, and they are taught starting from elementary school all the way through to high school.
So, what is the reality of the education landscape for the junior high and high school native language curriculum, which has only been implemented for just over a year?
What needs attention first and foremost is the glaring issue of teacher credentials. Native language teachers mainly consist of part-time instructors and teaching support staff who have obtained intermediate to advanced-level language certifications and full-time instructors who hold native language instruction certifications and licenses. Despite the establishment of university-level extended education credits for native language instruction, due to the sparse number of instructors out there and even the screening of incoming instructors, fully fleshed-out expertise is difficult to cultivate. Even if teachers are completely devoted to passing on their native languages, it is difficult for them to develop their expertise, leading to a waste of human resources.
Second, the curriculum material tends to be difficult. As there is a three-year junior high school gap between elementary schools and high schools, and students might have to choose a different native language or take new immigrant language courses such as Vietnamese or Indonesian, differing from what they previously studied, it could be impossible to connect the knowledge gap for some students. Add on that there are few standardized tests for native language coursework, and some learning materials lack a connection to daily life, leaving instructors frustrated. The government as well as publishers could effectively target and improve upon this dearth of materials.
Although the government’s complementary measures leave a bit to be desired, we are still resolutely determined that it should realize equality and the protection of our endangered languages and cultures. We cannot sit on our thumbs waiting until the 11th hour for all the parts to come together to implement these measures. Elementary school-level native language education has been in effect for 22 years; the present system is already well-matured. We just need to put faith in junior high and high school native language instruction to mirror the layout of the elementary school-level curriculum, gradually moving it toward perfection.
Looking to the future, the government could comprehensively implement all stipulated contents of the act, fix the shortage of instructors and materials as soon as possible, and provide opportunities for native language instructors to hone their acumen so as to fill in the present shortage of instructors, further breathing more life into Taiwan’s native languages.
Ng Siu-lin is deputy director of the Northern Taiwan Society
Translated by Tim Smith
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) continues to bully Taiwan by conducting military drills extremely close to Taiwan in late May 2024 and announcing a legal opinion in June on how they would treat “Taiwan Independence diehards” according to the PRC’s Criminal Code. This article will describe how China’s Anaconda Strategy of psychological and legal asphyxiation is employed. The CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and Chinese Coast Guard (CCG) conducted a “punishment military exercise” against Taiwan called “Joint Sword 2024A” from 23-24 May 2024, just three days after President William Lai (賴清德) of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) was sworn in and
Former US president Donald Trump’s comments that Taiwan hollowed out the US semiconductor industry are incorrect. That misunderstanding could impact the future of one of the world’s most important relationships and end up aiding China at a time it is working hard to push its own tech sector to catch up. “Taiwan took our chip business from us,” the returnee US presidential contender told Bloomberg Businessweek in an interview published this week. The remarks came after the Republican nominee was asked whether he would defend Taiwan against China. It is not the first time he has said this about the nation’s
In a recent interview with the Malaysian Chinese-language newspaper Sin Chew Daily, former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) called President William Lai (賴清德) “naive.” As always with Ma, one must first deconstruct what he is saying to fully understand the parallel universe he insists on defending. Who is being “naive,” Lai or Ma? The quickest way is to confront Ma with a series of pointed questions that force him to take clear stands on the complex issues involved and prevent him from his usual ramblings. Regarding China and Taiwan, the media should first begin with questions like these: “Did the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)
The Yomiuri Shimbun, the newspaper with the largest daily circulation in Japan, on Thursday last week published an article saying that an unidentified high-ranking Japanese official openly spoke of an analysis that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) needs less than a week, not a month, to invade Taiwan with its amphibious forces. Reportedly, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida has already been advised of the analysis, which was based on the PLA’s military exercises last summer. A Yomiuri analysis of unclassified satellite photographs confirmed that the PLA has already begun necessary base repairs and maintenance, and is conducting amphibious operation exercises