China-based electric vehicle (EV) maker BYD Co sold more than 526,000 vehicles in the fourth quarter of last year, outperforming global EV leader Tesla Inc’s about 485,000 vehicles. Instead of celebrating BYD overtaking Tesla to top the EV sales, the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) mouthpiece Global Times published an editorial criticizing the Western theory of the Chinese EV threat.
It is reminiscent of the “Sputnik crisis” in 1957, when the USSR achieved the first successful satellite launch, starting the space race between it and the US. With the attention and support of the US public and government, the US eventually won out by landing the first crewed mission on the moon.
BYD overtaking Tesla has awakened the already wary US and the EU.
Under the banner of net zero carbon emissions and environmental protection, Europe once embraced China’s low-priced EVs, which were 30 to 40 percent cheaper than the local average.
In September last year, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced an investigation into subsidized EVs from China, stressing the painful experience of the European solar industry being completely crushed by China.
Two months later, Von der Leyen publicly complained that Beijing had heavily subsidized the EV industry, allowing cheap Chinese-made vehicles to be dumped in the European market.
The administration of US President Joe Biden is considering raising import tariffs on Chinese EVs and EV battery packs to support the US’ domestic new energy industry and compete with low-priced products from China.
According to statistics from the International Energy Agency, eight out of every 10 solar panels in the world are made in China. Chinese manufacturers continue to blindly compete for the solar photovoltaics investment bubble. It is expected that after next year, global solar panel production and supply are to be entirely monopolized by China. The vicious cycle of severe oversupply has led to price collapse and low profits, killing the European and US solar industries.
The US and the EU are in a dilemma. By embracing clean, renewable energy they effectively left their door wide open to Chinese manufacturing facilities and equipment. China’s EV manufacturing intends to copy the rise of the solar industry. Despite problems such as overcapacity and uneven quality, economies of scale and a complete supply chain still enable China to launch world-class products. Even if it cannot dominate the global market, it could at least capture a certain share. As most of the key battery supply chains are in the hands of Beijing, the US and the EU have no choice but to introduce subsidies and strive to catch up in the research, development and promotion of new energy vehicles.
The US and the EU, burdened by climate change, have come to realize that forcing the elimination and transformation of traditional vehicles could instead give Chinese-made EVs an opportunity to grow rapidly, impacting the traditional European vehicle manufacturing industry, at the potential cost of tens of thousands of jobs. The US and EU are facing reality and slowing down the transformation.
It is not too late for the EU and the US to change course. In mid-December last year, Germany completely canceled its car purchase subsidies, and France also revised its car purchase incentive regulations in favor of French and European products. Meanwhile, according to the US Inflation Reduction Act, EVs containing battery components made or assembled in China are excluded from duty-free discount, starting from Jan. 1.
Chen Yung-chang is a company manager.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS