China-based electric vehicle (EV) maker BYD Co sold more than 526,000 vehicles in the fourth quarter of last year, outperforming global EV leader Tesla Inc’s about 485,000 vehicles. Instead of celebrating BYD overtaking Tesla to top the EV sales, the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) mouthpiece Global Times published an editorial criticizing the Western theory of the Chinese EV threat.
It is reminiscent of the “Sputnik crisis” in 1957, when the USSR achieved the first successful satellite launch, starting the space race between it and the US. With the attention and support of the US public and government, the US eventually won out by landing the first crewed mission on the moon.
BYD overtaking Tesla has awakened the already wary US and the EU.
Under the banner of net zero carbon emissions and environmental protection, Europe once embraced China’s low-priced EVs, which were 30 to 40 percent cheaper than the local average.
In September last year, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced an investigation into subsidized EVs from China, stressing the painful experience of the European solar industry being completely crushed by China.
Two months later, Von der Leyen publicly complained that Beijing had heavily subsidized the EV industry, allowing cheap Chinese-made vehicles to be dumped in the European market.
The administration of US President Joe Biden is considering raising import tariffs on Chinese EVs and EV battery packs to support the US’ domestic new energy industry and compete with low-priced products from China.
According to statistics from the International Energy Agency, eight out of every 10 solar panels in the world are made in China. Chinese manufacturers continue to blindly compete for the solar photovoltaics investment bubble. It is expected that after next year, global solar panel production and supply are to be entirely monopolized by China. The vicious cycle of severe oversupply has led to price collapse and low profits, killing the European and US solar industries.
The US and the EU are in a dilemma. By embracing clean, renewable energy they effectively left their door wide open to Chinese manufacturing facilities and equipment. China’s EV manufacturing intends to copy the rise of the solar industry. Despite problems such as overcapacity and uneven quality, economies of scale and a complete supply chain still enable China to launch world-class products. Even if it cannot dominate the global market, it could at least capture a certain share. As most of the key battery supply chains are in the hands of Beijing, the US and the EU have no choice but to introduce subsidies and strive to catch up in the research, development and promotion of new energy vehicles.
The US and the EU, burdened by climate change, have come to realize that forcing the elimination and transformation of traditional vehicles could instead give Chinese-made EVs an opportunity to grow rapidly, impacting the traditional European vehicle manufacturing industry, at the potential cost of tens of thousands of jobs. The US and EU are facing reality and slowing down the transformation.
It is not too late for the EU and the US to change course. In mid-December last year, Germany completely canceled its car purchase subsidies, and France also revised its car purchase incentive regulations in favor of French and European products. Meanwhile, according to the US Inflation Reduction Act, EVs containing battery components made or assembled in China are excluded from duty-free discount, starting from Jan. 1.
Chen Yung-chang is a company manager.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization