Lessons from the elections
Following Saturday’s presidential and legislative elections, even if Taiwan-centric voters anticipated that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) might not win more than half the seats in the Legislative Yuan, they might still find it hard to accept this result. Disappointing as it is, this outcome raises some points for reflection.
The first theory about the DPP’s loss of seats is the factor of divided votes. In the 2020 legislative election, I thought the reason DPP candidates failed to be elected in legislative constituencies such as Songshan-Xinyi (松山-信義) in Taipei and New Taipei City’s Constituency 1, which includes Tamsui (淡水) and other districts, was that candidates standing for the New Power Party or the Taiwan People’s Party split the pan-green vote.
However, I changed my mind about this following the 2022 local government elections. Taking last weekend’s election in Taipei’s Nankang-Neihu (南港-內湖) constituency and the views of some of my Facebook friends who live there as an example, some of them half a year ago and some a month or two ago said they would cast all three of their ballots for the DPP even if they had negative opinions about the constituency’s DPP Legislator Kao Chia-yu (高嘉瑜).
On the other hand, some people insisted on not voting for Kao and shifted their support to the Taiwan Statebuilding Party candidate, Wu Hsin-tai (吳欣岱). After the votes were counted, about half of my friends blamed Wu for splitting the vote and said that those who did not vote for Kao were responsible for her loss to her Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) rival, Lee Yen-hsiu (李彥秀). Although Wu’s and Kao’s votes came from a similar support base, it would be wrong to assume that each vote for Wu equals one fewer vote for Kao.
The second question to ponder is whether the DPP should allow its serving legislators to stand as candidates in the 2026 local government elections. In the past, the DPP has criticized KMT politicians such as former legislators Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) and Lin Yi-hua (林奕華), now mayor and deputy mayor of Taipei respectively, former Taipei City Councilor Lo Chih-chiang (羅智強) and New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) for abandoning their jobs to stand for election or take up other government appointments. Considering the high standards that voters expect of the DPP, the party’s legislators would probably suffer an even stronger boomerang effect if they made similar moves. It would be wise to think about this now.
A third point is that the DPP should not underestimate KMT Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕). Lu’s second term in office ends in 2026, so if she stands as the “non-green” camp’s candidate in the 2028 presidential election, she would not face accusations of being a “runaway mayor.” Neither could anyone say things like “the deep blues will not support her” or that she is “blue in her skin, but green in her bones,” as have been bandied about this past year. As the biggest party in the Taiwan-centric camp, how would the DPP handle such a challenge?
The fourth and final conundrum is what to do about new media. When it comes to TikTok and Internet celebrities, some people around my age like to joke that when your kids turn to TikTok, you have raised them for nothing. Unfortunately, TikTok watchers have the same right to vote as you and me. No matter whether you find TikTok users infuriating or amusing, you cannot change this reality. Hopefully after Vice President William Lai (賴清德) is inaugurated in May, his administration will think hard about how to tackle the challenge of new media.
Chen Ching-hsiang
Taipei
A Taiwan State of the Union
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has proposed having a State of the Union address by the Taiwanese president. In the US, the State of the Union has proven to be a powerful instrument to outline and propose policy, indicate conditions the nation is facing, economic ailments, the administration’s improvement and evolution and the president’s priorities and domestic and international legislative agenda.
The US address satisfies constitutional requirements, and such an addition to Taiwan’s constitution would enrich the nation and supplement its transnational relations. The statement of essential information and principles looking to the future could bring a new state of confidence and clarity on where Taiwan stands in the world. The president could provide the public with information on the actual state of the nation and endorse any procedures considered “necessary and expedient” to the country’s growth and expansion. This would be a step forward, and it is a bit confusing that Taiwan has not adopted this standard practice, although the president’s New Year address might in some respects stand in.
Major State of the Union addresses in the US include former US president Lyndon Johnson’s declaration of an “unconditional war on poverty” in 1965 and former US president Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s “Four Freedoms” speech in 1941. Many other addresses have underscored important US developments and advances in politics and society. During the address, all members of the US Congress are present, as well as the executive cabinet and the judiciary, bringing all branches of US government together. Foreign dignitaries are invited, as well as notable domestic leaders and innovators. Such an agglomeration hearing and participating in such a dialogue brings a real sense of national unity. US President Joe Biden said in his State of the Union address last year: “We must see each other not as enemies, but as fellow Americans,” embracing this sense of unity.
When Biden continued by saying: “We are… the only nation in the world built on an idea,” we might well see Taiwan in the same light.
All of this could benefit Taiwan’s status and feelings of inclusion, domestically and internationally. Hopefully, we could see a Taiwanese president give such a speech soon.
David Pendery
Taipei
Taiwan’s victory in the World Baseball Softball Confederation Premier12 championship is an historic achievement. Yet once again this achievement is marred by the indignity of the imposed moniker “Chinese Taipei.” The absurdity is compounded by the fact that none of the players are even from Taipei, and some, such as Paiwan catcher Giljegiljaw Kungkuan, are not even ethnically Chinese. The issue garnered attention around the Paris Olympics, yet fell off the agenda as Olympic memories retreated. “Chinese Taipei” persists, and the baseball championship serves as a reminder that fighting “Chinese Taipei” must be a continuous campaign, not merely resurfacing around international
This month, the National Health Insurance (NHI) is to implement a major policy change by eliminating the suspension-and-resumption mechanism for Taiwanese residing abroad. With more than 210,000 Taiwanese living overseas — many with greater financial means than those in Taiwan — this reform, catalyzed by a 2022 Constitutional Court ruling, underscores the importance of fairness, sustainability and shared responsibility in one of the world’s most admired public healthcare systems. Beyond legal obligations, expatriates have a compelling moral duty to contribute, recognizing their stake in a system that embodies the principle of health as a human right. The ruling declared the prior
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) appears to be encountering some culture shock and safety issues at its new fab in Arizona. On Nov. 7, Arizona state authorities cited TSMC for worker safety violations, fining the company US$16,131, after a man died in May. The Arizona Division of Occupational Safety and Health released its six-month investigation into the fatality and cited TSMC for failing to keep the workplace free from hazards likely to cause death or serious harm. At about the same time, the chip giant was also sued for alleged discriminatory hiring practices favoring Asians, prompting a flurry of debate on whether TSMC’s
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Weng Hsiao-ling (翁曉玲) has motioned to abolish the “Wu Sz-huai” (吳斯懷) clauses of the Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例) — which forbid all Taiwanese who enter China from engaging in any activities detrimental to national security or interests. This motion led the Taiwan Statebuilding Party (TSP) to report her for infringing upon the National Security Act (國家安全法), which Weng called a lawless and undisciplined attempt to threaten a legislator. However, the true lawless and undisciplined person is Weng — the one standing in the enemy
RSS