As the presidential election enters the final countdown, all three tickets are using every second to woo votes.
In a popular YouTube video circulating this week, an interviewer asks college students about who they would vote for, with most saying Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), indicating Ko’s immense popularity among young people.
Why is he so strongly favored by young people given his many flaws?
Simply put, young people are rebels without a cause. Fed up with the long-term rivalry and conflict between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), they find Ko and his party “less detestable” than the others.
Of course, Ko is not without his charm and possesses other qualities that young people find appealing. A National Taiwan University doctor who claims to have a high IQ, Ko fires razor-sharp, off-the-cuff remarks that are often controversial, if not inappropriate. His remarks often carry a defiant undertone that resonates with young people, making him “their cup of tea.”
In terms of diplomacy and international relations, Ko seldom touches upon issues like Taiwan’s relations with the US or China, and even when he does, his pronouncements are more fantastical than realistic. Regarding China, he says he seeks a middle way of neither pushing back nor appeasing. His devil-may-care, nonchalant attitude has struck a chord with young people. After all, they do not enjoy the sounds and furies of politics, they only wish to carry on leading quiet lives, away from having to think about the quagmire of cross-strait relations.
However, young people are forgetting that their “quiet lives” are the result of the blood and toil of their forebears in fighting for freedom and democracy. Taiwan would not have the freedom it has today if not for the relentless efforts paid in blood by DPP democracy advocates. Without former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) democratic reforms and former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) carrying the democratic baton forward, Taiwan would still be a one-party state instead of a multi-party system. Only with President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) eight years of exceptional diplomatic and domestic leadership has Taiwan become Asia’s top democracy and economy.
Young people should remember that democracy is not something that fell from the sky. It is a fragile thing and could be easily lost if not carefully protected. They have the right to avert or despise politics, but they must remember that the quiet lives that they wish to hold on to are based on their nation’s democratic system.
It is easy to be cynical and vote for Ko to teach the KMT and the DPP a lesson. However, a ballot has never been a mere piece of paper, but a decisive tool in determining a nation’s fate and its people.
The biggest issue with Ko is neither his cunning, capriciousness nor his acting like a mommy’s boy, but his cavalier attitude toward cross-strait policy and other international relations. To Taiwan, nothing matters more than this.
Taiwan’s high-tech industry would not be able to thrive without the right allies by its side. If Taiwan and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (台積電) were to fall into the hands of China, Taiwan would find itself on the US sanctions list. Without the US’ chip design, there would be no need for chip manufacturing, not to mention economic and domestic issues that are closely associated with cross-strait relations.
Politics lies at the root of the workings of a nation. Young people must not choose someone who is “hip” or “cool” at an impulse over one who has a decisive vision and well-founded policies for the nation. Every ballot could become the key to changing Taiwan’s future.
Tread carefully, young people, for you might be treading on your dreams.
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
A recent piece of international news has drawn surprisingly little attention, yet it deserves far closer scrutiny. German industrial heavyweight Siemens Mobility has reportedly outmaneuvered long-entrenched Chinese competitors in Southeast Asian infrastructure to secure a strategic partnership with Vietnam’s largest private conglomerate, Vingroup. The agreement positions Siemens to participate in the construction of a high-speed rail link between Hanoi and Ha Long Bay. German media were blunt in their assessment: This was not merely a commercial win, but has symbolic significance in “reshaping geopolitical influence.” At first glance, this might look like a routine outcome of corporate bidding. However, placed in
China often describes itself as the natural leader of the global south: a power that respects sovereignty, rejects coercion and offers developing countries an alternative to Western pressure. For years, Venezuela was held up — implicitly and sometimes explicitly — as proof that this model worked. Today, Venezuela is exposing the limits of that claim. Beijing’s response to the latest crisis in Venezuela has been striking not only for its content, but for its tone. Chinese officials have abandoned their usual restrained diplomatic phrasing and adopted language that is unusually direct by Beijing’s standards. The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs described the
RSS