Japan is reeling from the powerful earthquake that struck the Noto Peninsula in Ishikawa Prefecture on Monday afternoon. Apart from tsunami warnings, the thing people most worried about when the quake hit was whether nearby nuclear power plants were safe. After all, if another disaster like the 2011 disaster at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant were to reoccur, the results would be unthinkable.
It is wise to learn from others’ experiences. Taiwan and Japan both lie along the Pacific Ring of Fire and face the same risk of tectonic plate dislocation, and are riddled with major and minor geological faults. In other words, the natural disasters that threaten Japanese nuclear power plants are equally applicable to Taiwan.
However, Japan is more than 10 times the size of Taiwan, so even in the case of the Fukushima nuclear disaster, residents of the region were able to disperse elsewhere. What about Taiwan? Taipei and New Taipei City have a combined population of nearly 10 million, most of whom live less than 30km from the two nuclear power plants located on the north coast. If they ever needed to evacuate, where would they go? In Taipei’s Neihu District (內湖) traffic is gridlocked at rush hour five days a week, so how could people leave if everyone tried escaping all at once?
Anyone who buys real-estate knows they should choose the location with care and try avoiding having nuclear facilities in their backyard. There is nothing unusual about Taipei property prices of more than NT$1 million (US$32,241) per ping (3.31m2). Goodness knows how many people’s life savings and wealth are tied up in their homes. If any more nuclear power plants are built in northern Taiwan, it would just increase the risk of property prices in the region being reduced to nothing overnight. Who could afford to take such a gamble?
If such a nuclear power plant were truly completely safe, as some people would have us believe, then why are top officials and the wealthy not willing to live next door to one? Why have mayors and county commissioners never scrambled to buy such property? You do not need to be an expert — common sense would tell you why, and it would also tell you why Taiwan is in no position to build any more plants.
Huang Wei-ping works in public service and has a master’s degree from the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University in the US.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
China’s supreme objective in a war across the Taiwan Strait is to incorporate Taiwan as a province of the People’s Republic. It follows, therefore, that international recognition of Taiwan’s de jure independence is a consummation that China’s leaders devoutly wish to avoid. By the same token, an American strategy to deny China that objective would complicate Beijing’s calculus and deter large-scale hostilities. For decades, China has cautioned “independence means war.” The opposite is also true: “war means independence.” A comprehensive strategy of denial would guarantee an outcome of de jure independence for Taiwan in the event of Chinese invasion or
A recent Taipei Times editorial (“A targeted bilingual policy,” March 12, page 8) questioned how the Ministry of Education can justify spending NT$151 million (US$4.74 million) when the spotlighted achievements are English speech competitions and campus tours. It is a fair question, but it focuses on the wrong issue. The problem is not last year’s outcomes failing to meet the bilingual education vision; the issue is that the ministry has abandoned the program that originally justified such a large expenditure. In the early years of Bilingual 2030, the ministry’s K-12 Administration promoted the Bilingual Instruction in Select Domains Program (部分領域課程雙語教學實施計畫).
Former Fijian prime minister Mahendra Chaudhry spoke at the Yushan Forum in Taipei on Monday, saying that while global conflicts were causing economic strife in the world, Taiwan’s New Southbound Policy (NSP) serves as a stabilizing force in the Indo-Pacific region and offers strategic opportunities for small island nations such as Fiji, as well as support in the fields of public health, education, renewable energy and agricultural technology. Taiwan does not have official diplomatic relations with Fiji, but it is one of the small island nations covered by the NSP. Chaudhry said that Fiji, as a sovereign nation, should support
RSS