Japan is reeling from the powerful earthquake that struck the Noto Peninsula in Ishikawa Prefecture on Monday afternoon. Apart from tsunami warnings, the thing people most worried about when the quake hit was whether nearby nuclear power plants were safe. After all, if another disaster like the 2011 disaster at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant were to reoccur, the results would be unthinkable.
It is wise to learn from others’ experiences. Taiwan and Japan both lie along the Pacific Ring of Fire and face the same risk of tectonic plate dislocation, and are riddled with major and minor geological faults. In other words, the natural disasters that threaten Japanese nuclear power plants are equally applicable to Taiwan.
However, Japan is more than 10 times the size of Taiwan, so even in the case of the Fukushima nuclear disaster, residents of the region were able to disperse elsewhere. What about Taiwan? Taipei and New Taipei City have a combined population of nearly 10 million, most of whom live less than 30km from the two nuclear power plants located on the north coast. If they ever needed to evacuate, where would they go? In Taipei’s Neihu District (內湖) traffic is gridlocked at rush hour five days a week, so how could people leave if everyone tried escaping all at once?
Anyone who buys real-estate knows they should choose the location with care and try avoiding having nuclear facilities in their backyard. There is nothing unusual about Taipei property prices of more than NT$1 million (US$32,241) per ping (3.31m2). Goodness knows how many people’s life savings and wealth are tied up in their homes. If any more nuclear power plants are built in northern Taiwan, it would just increase the risk of property prices in the region being reduced to nothing overnight. Who could afford to take such a gamble?
If such a nuclear power plant were truly completely safe, as some people would have us believe, then why are top officials and the wealthy not willing to live next door to one? Why have mayors and county commissioners never scrambled to buy such property? You do not need to be an expert — common sense would tell you why, and it would also tell you why Taiwan is in no position to build any more plants.
Huang Wei-ping works in public service and has a master’s degree from the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University in the US.
Translated by Julian Clegg
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
RSS