On Dec. 28 last year, Reuters reported that China has been pressuring Taiwanese rock band Mayday to make pro-China comments. It is alleged that Beijing wanted Mayday to declare their support for the so-called “1992 consensus,” but the band refused.
Reuters is one of the largest news agencies in the world and has a long-standing reputation for credibility. Reuters also attempted to fact-check the allegations, but Chinese Communist Party (CCP) officials did not respond to requests for comment.
Even then, China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) said that the Reuters report was “fake news from start to finish.”
Considering the presidential and legislative elections are in less than two weeks, some have said that the pan-blue camp, spearheaded by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), has cooperated with the TAO to spread rumors about the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP).
As of yet, Mayday has not made a public statement, without which no one can be sure of the truth.
Yet, evidence shows that the band has been coerced by the CCP.
After Mayday was accused of lip-synching, Chinese officials began investigating the incident, but after almost a month, the “investigation” is ongoing. Clearly, without Mayday’s “collaboration,” the CCP is unlikely to end its probe.
Moreover, it is well known that the CCP has been intervening in Taiwan’s elections through all sorts of channels. Beijing’s threats have become even more wanton of late. Some Chinese officials believe that their threats will work effectively. In their opinion, if they can pressure Mayday into making pro-China comments, they could influence Taiwan’s younger voters.
However, they are very much mistaken.
In the TAO’s public announcement, the Reuters report is fake news and the DPP government deliberately allowed the rumor mill to run wild, but it did not respond to Reuters immediately after the report. Instead, it rejected Reuters’ report only after witnessing a collective protest by Taiwan’s political parties.
The timing of the TAO’s response can be easily explained: After witnessing the protest, it realized that Beijing should not have pressured Mayday. In other words, Chinese officials realized that their scheme would only backfire on China; worse, it would allow the pan-green camp to make significant gains in the election.
Beijing’s political manipulation is so conspicuous that Taiwan and the international community have every reason to believe the Reuters report.
It is also more than obvious that the pan-blue camp went along with what the TAO said. The blue camp did not verify the rumors and news, nor did they criticize the ways in which Taiwanese were coerced by the CCP, which wanted them to swear their allegiance to China.
Pan-blue politicians have avoided challenging China’s interference in Taiwan’s presidential and legislative elections. Beijing is already known for its interventions in other countries, as well as spreading fake news. Every democratic country knows that China’s purpose is to harass democracies and disturb their domestic affairs.
For decades, Taiwan has been targeted the most, but KMT members and pan-blue politicians in general have refrained from talking about China’s interventions — if not ignored the matter entirely. As can be seen throughout their election campaigns, the KMT and the pan-blue camp are only capable of spreading hatred against the ruling party. In this sense, the election is their means to put their ideology into practice by disparaging the DPP.
Liu Shih-ming is an adjunct associate professor in the Graduate School of Taiwanese Culture at the National Taipei University of Education.
Translated by Emma Liu
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
In an eloquently written piece published on Sunday, French-Taiwanese education and policy consultant Ninon Godefroy presents an interesting take on the Taiwanese character, as viewed from the eyes of an — at least partial — outsider. She muses that the non-assuming and quiet efficiency of a particularly Taiwanese approach to life and work is behind the global success stories of two very different Taiwanese institutions: Din Tai Fung and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). Godefroy said that it is this “humble” approach that endears the nation to visitors, over and above any big ticket attractions that other countries may have
A media report has suggested that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) was considering initiating a vote of no confidence in Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) in a bid to “bring down the Cabinet.” The KMT has denied that this topic was ever discussed. Why might such a move have even be considered? It would have been absurd if it had seen the light of day — potentially leading to a mass loss of legislative seats for the KMT even without the recall petitions already under way. Today the second phase of the recall movement is to begin — which has
RSS