With generational differences and partisan loyalties in the pan-blue and pan-green camps, the three main parties — the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) — remain close in polls running up to the presidential and legislative elections.
They need to consider how they could attract support from minority groups outside of their established voter bases.
Hong Kong celebrity Chapman To (杜汶澤) is to vote in Taiwan for the first time after receiving his national identification card. He is just one of many Hong Kongers who have immigrated to Taiwan over the past few years.
There are about 590,000 “new immigrants” — 300,000 of whom have the right to vote. Many are parents, with the number of children reaching as many as 450,000; they are sure to be on the lookout for a better future for their kids.
There are 1,028,000 first-time voters considered to be in minority groups between the ages of 20 and 24, with 580,000 being indigenous people who are largely forgotten by politicians; 5 percent of the population identifying as non-heterosexual; residents of eastern Taiwan, as well as those living on outlying islands, all of whom could have a major impact on election results as significant minority voter groups.
However, on issues and policies related to minorities, all major parties, whether they are the governing majority or the opposition, still have much room to improve. Nominating indigenous legislators and legislator-at-large slots or new immigrants is little more than window dressing. Similarly, legacy media and online commentators rarely have a handle on the political preferences of minority groups.
How to win support from new immigrants and indigenous people, whose voices are usually neglected, as well as first-time swing voters, often escapes the minds of campaign staffers. What is worse, when the KMT, DPP and TPP struggle to devise appropriate political policies or have anything to show regarding minorities, they only obfuscate and accuse their rivals of not doing enough for these underrepresented groups.
Minorities were not seen as important in the past three transfers of political power. Ethnic ties, factions and generational differences were the main factors keeping younger generations and minorities outside of politics.
Even within these different groups, we see established patterns of political loyalty. Hong Kongers who relocated to Taiwan and LGBTQ+ groups tend to be pro-green, residents of outlying islands and rural areas are generally pro-blue and the children of new immigrants tend to be pro-TPP.
The majority and mainstream media find it hard to convince minorities to join their side. Taking advantage of concurrent social network promotion and on-the-ground activities is a good way to achieve this, but how to convert this into votes is the real challenge.
Due to their different stances on gender equality, the KMT’s presidential candidate, New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), and TPP Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) did not attend Kaohsiung Pride.
The DPP’s presidential candidate, Vice President William Lai (賴清德), who lacks supporters in Kinmen County could only stand back and watch blue camp figures advocate for peace on the anniversary of the 823 Artillery Bombardment. Lai and his running mate, former representative to the US Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴), do not see the outlying islands as fertile ground for garnering support.
As examples of targeted policies, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) won the 2020 presidential election due to younger voters, while former Kaohsiung mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) won the local election by calling on Kaohsiung residents working in northern Taiwan to return to vote.
In next month’s elections, how to persuade minorities to vote for you instead of your opponent will be crucial.
Jet Yang is editor-in-chief of Knowing Media Group.
Translated by Chien Yan-ru
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
China’s supreme objective in a war across the Taiwan Strait is to incorporate Taiwan as a province of the People’s Republic. It follows, therefore, that international recognition of Taiwan’s de jure independence is a consummation that China’s leaders devoutly wish to avoid. By the same token, an American strategy to deny China that objective would complicate Beijing’s calculus and deter large-scale hostilities. For decades, China has cautioned “independence means war.” The opposite is also true: “war means independence.” A comprehensive strategy of denial would guarantee an outcome of de jure independence for Taiwan in the event of Chinese invasion or
A recent Taipei Times editorial (“A targeted bilingual policy,” March 12, page 8) questioned how the Ministry of Education can justify spending NT$151 million (US$4.74 million) when the spotlighted achievements are English speech competitions and campus tours. It is a fair question, but it focuses on the wrong issue. The problem is not last year’s outcomes failing to meet the bilingual education vision; the issue is that the ministry has abandoned the program that originally justified such a large expenditure. In the early years of Bilingual 2030, the ministry’s K-12 Administration promoted the Bilingual Instruction in Select Domains Program (部分領域課程雙語教學實施計畫).
Former Fijian prime minister Mahendra Chaudhry spoke at the Yushan Forum in Taipei on Monday, saying that while global conflicts were causing economic strife in the world, Taiwan’s New Southbound Policy (NSP) serves as a stabilizing force in the Indo-Pacific region and offers strategic opportunities for small island nations such as Fiji, as well as support in the fields of public health, education, renewable energy and agricultural technology. Taiwan does not have official diplomatic relations with Fiji, but it is one of the small island nations covered by the NSP. Chaudhry said that Fiji, as a sovereign nation, should support
RSS