Beijing’s “one China” principle is a legalized political propaganda attempt aimed to facilitate the annexation of Taiwan, by suggesting that the issue of Taiwan is a “domestic matter,” thereby preventing the US and Japan from interventing in the event of a cross-strait conflict. This begs the question: Is it true that Taiwan belongs to China as claimed by the “one China” principle?
Since the principle of sovereignty, which is the supreme authority within a territory, is pivotal in modern international law, one first needs to establish which international law the “one China” principle is based on.
Last year’s white paper “The Taiwan Question and China’s Unification in the New Era” published by the Chinese government states that in September 1945, Japan signed the Japanese Instrument of Surrender and vowed “to carry out the provisions of the Potsdam Declaration in good faith,” which is to return Taiwan and the Penghu islands to China as outlined in the Cairo Declaration.
On Oct. 25, 1945, the Republic of China (ROC) government announced that it had “resumed its jurisdiction over Taiwan.” According to this logic, China had recovered Taiwan de jure and de facto through a host of international legal documents. As a result, the interpretation that “Japan returned Taiwan and the Penghu islands to China in 1945” is the legal foundation for Beijing’s “one China” principle.
However, as the ROC government had not signed any documents of formal cession, it is void for it to unilaterally proclaim jurisdiction over Taiwan. Japan did not cede Taiwan and the Penghu islands to the ROC or the People’s Republic of China, it renounced all right, title and claim to Taiwan and the Penghu islands, which was dictated in the Treaty of San Francisco signed on April 28, 1952.
Due to this, the “one China” principle does not have any legal basis and therefore the contention that “Taiwan is part of China” is entirely false.
However, to obstruct Japan’s intervention in cross-strait issues, Beijing has consistently attempted to brainwash Japan with its “one China” principle. Consequently, the “Taiwan issue is a domestic problem” is deeply rooted in the Japanese mind, as part of China’s cognitive warfare against Japan.
Japan’s Asahi Shimbun, with its pro-China stance, published a report on Thursday last week analyzing relations between Taiwan and China. In the report, there was a sentence: “After Japan surrendered, China recovered Taiwan.”
I wrote to the Asahi Shimbun asking for a correction, but have yet to receive a reply.
I suspect that there are pro-China elements within the Asahi Shimbun. Unfortunately, many Japanese are under the long-term influence of Chinese propaganda, which makes them prone to accepting these false reports.
I hope the Taiwanese government and its people can understand how influential and dominant Chinese propaganda is within the international community. Taiwanese should also stiffen their sinews and condemn China for continuing its one-sided claim to Taiwan through the “one China” principle, so that other nations know that China and Taiwan are not the same country in accordance with international law.
Above all, Taiwanese should not vote for a presidential candidate who is in favor of the “one China” principle in next month’s election.
Hideki Nagayama is chairman of the Taiwan Research Forum.
Translated by Rita Wang
Xiaomi Corp founder Lei Jun (雷軍) on May 22 made a high-profile announcement, giving online viewers a sneak peek at the company’s first 3-nanometer mobile processor — the Xring O1 chip — and saying it is a breakthrough in China’s chip design history. Although Xiaomi might be capable of designing chips, it lacks the ability to manufacture them. No matter how beautifully planned the blueprints are, if they cannot be mass-produced, they are nothing more than drawings on paper. The truth is that China’s chipmaking efforts are still heavily reliant on the free world — particularly on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
Keelung Mayor George Hsieh (謝國樑) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) on Tuesday last week apologized over allegations that the former director of the city’s Civil Affairs Department had illegally accessed citizens’ data to assist the KMT in its campaign to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) councilors. Given the public discontent with opposition lawmakers’ disruptive behavior in the legislature, passage of unconstitutional legislation and slashing of the central government’s budget, civic groups have launched a massive campaign to recall KMT lawmakers. The KMT has tried to fight back by initiating campaigns to recall DPP lawmakers, but the petition documents they
A recent scandal involving a high-school student from a private school in Taichung has reignited long-standing frustrations with Taiwan’s increasingly complex and high-pressure university admissions system. The student, who had successfully gained admission to several prestigious medical schools, shared their learning portfolio on social media — only for Internet sleuths to quickly uncover a falsified claim of receiving a “Best Debater” award. The fallout was swift and unforgiving. National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University and Taipei Medical University revoked the student’s admission on Wednesday. One day later, Chung Shan Medical University also announced it would cancel the student’s admission. China Medical
Construction of the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County’s Hengchun Township (恆春) started in 1978. It began commercial operations in 1984. Since then, it has experienced several accidents, radiation pollution and fires. It was finally decommissioned on May 17 after the operating license of its No. 2 reactor expired. However, a proposed referendum to be held on Aug. 23 on restarting the reactor is potentially bringing back those risks. Four reasons are listed for holding the referendum: First, the difficulty of meeting greenhouse gas reduction targets and the inefficiency of new energy sources such as photovoltaic and wind power. Second,
RSS