The Chinese classics can be found in China, Japan and Korea. In the Sinosphere, Japan was particularly influenced by the culture of the Tang Dynasty, before which Korea was already under the influence of the Han Dynasty. Confucius once said, when the etiquette and rites (of the tradition of the core states) are lost, one may seek them in the wild.
Today, it would be easier to find Chinese classics in Japan and Korea.
When Tunghai University was established near Dadu Mountain, many Taiwanese thought its buildings resembled Japanese architecture. The university campus was designed by a team of architects, including I.M. Pei (貝聿銘) and Chen Chi-kwan (陳其寬), who said that they were inspired by the style of the Tang Dynasty. The Tang style reminded the public of Japan precisely because Japan’s Taika reform was heavily influenced by the Tang Dynasty. The Taika reform laid the foundation for the Meiji Restoration, both of which are integral to Japanese culture today.
Throughout history, Korean dynastic kingdoms were often tributary states of Chinese dynasties. Hence, in comparison to Japan, Korea is more deeply impacted by Chinese culture. More than once, Koreans have asserted the association between Korean and Chinese traditional festivals.
It is thought that the word “China” is derived from the name of the Qin Dynasty. After a series of wars, the Qin state unified other states and its duke became the first ruler of a unified China as First Emperor of China Qin Shihuangdi (秦始皇帝). Subsequently, China went through several dynasties, including the Han, Tang, Song, Yuan, Ming and Qing.
Of course, China was never a purely Han Chinese empire, nor has Chinese culture been an entirely unified one. In modern times, the Republic of China (ROC) and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) have carried on Han Chinese traditions, but Chinese culture has evolved.
Similarly, although Chinese culture has played a significant part in the development of Japanese and Korean cultures, Japan and Korea have also learned from Western countries, rather than merely adhering to Han Chinese traditions. Japan and Korea also developed their own writing systems.
To govern to the benefit of its citizens, a state should not place sole emphasis on the material aspect of life, rather, it should highlight the consciousness as well. A state should learn from the cultures of other ethnic and national groups, enhancing itself without harming others. This is how a country progresses in the modern world.
The ROC and the PRC have also taken in other ethnic and national cultures. Nevertheless, over the past few decades, the PRC has made an effort to destroy Chinese culture, as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has transformed the Chinese people and society through Marxism-Leninism. Consequently, the PRC has become a desinicized China. On the other hand, ruled by the Chiang family, the ROC government consolidated its martial law regime by being anti communist. Yet after Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) died, several Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) members turned to communist China.
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) had been well protected by Chiang Ching-kuo, and was able to obtain and use all the resources of the KMT. Ma adheres to the principle of “one China.” Once an anti-communist patriot, he has become a CCP supporter who despises Taiwan. Ma’s case shows the dark side of Chinese culture.
One of the notorious aspects of Chinese culture is that one’s words do not match one’s actions. The disparity is often easily observable. When the KMT lost the Chinese Civil War, its party members occupied Taiwan, yet they claimed that they were the legitimate rulers of Taiwan. These KMT members were shameless, and yet they talked about integrity and shame louder than anyone.
Some say that the KMT and the CCP have different cultural essences: The former is a hypocrite and the latter a true villain. Why? The KMT talks about the ancient saints and sages, teaching others how to behave righteously and morally, but its own conduct demonstrates a lack of benevolence and ethics. As for the CCP, it believes in Marxism-Leninism, and governs its populace with brutality, not even trying to hide it.
It might be that Taiwan is where true Chinese classics can be found, given that Taiwan shares some ancient connections with China. The ancestors of the Taiwanese crossed the rough waters of the Taiwan Strait to develop and settle the land. They were people of the Sinosphere, and they must have brought with them the simple culture of the common people. Such a Chinese culture is different from the one claimed by the KMT or the CCP.
Afterward, Taiwan was colonized by Japan, which brought in European culture. In this sense, Taiwan is closer to Japan and South Korea — where the Chinese classics have been preserved, but mixed with other cultural elements.
Moreover, now that Taiwan has its own writing system, Chinese culture in Taiwan and China are not necessarily the same. Like Japan and South Korea, Taiwan is a part of the Sinosphere, but Taiwan is not China.
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Emma Liu
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS