The US House of Representatives last week authorized an impeachment inquiry into US President Joe Biden. The vote went strictly along party lines, with every Republican voting for it and every Democrat against. Clearly, the US House epitomizes the political divide in the country.
Today, the Republican Party and the Democratic Party are on par with one another, each supported equally by Americans. As a result, the US government has often become paralyzed due to a lack of collaboration between the parties. Worse, the House and the White House tend to hold each other back, leaving the entire government in limbo.
During the US midterm elections in November last year, the Republicans gained a narrow majority in the House. This was the starting point of the most recent political turbulence in the US. In January, Kevin McCarthy was elected House speaker after 15 rounds of voting. Nine months later, he was ousted. In exchange for being elected, McCarthy allegedly promised his right-wing colleagues an impeachment inquiry into Biden. It is believed that he revised regulations to make the impeachment procedure easier.
In September, McCarthy worked with the Democrats to pass a funding bill to avoid a government shutdown. Some Republicans were outraged by his move and planned to oust him from the speakership.
The polarization of the two parties resulted in a political quagmire in which the Republicans and the Democrats always oppose each other’s agendas. For example, even though McCarthy sought a bipartisan collaboration that would benefit the Biden administration, the Democrats still unanimously voted to oust him.
New US House Speaker Mike Johnson tried to suspend the impeachment inquiry into Biden, but faced great political pressure from fellow Republicans, who wanted to take revenge on the Democrats for twice impeaching former US president Donald Trump.
Without a majority in the US Congress, the extremists in each party often gain more power, and because of them, the legislative branch becomes paralyzed and left in limbo. When hardliners become more influential, they become even fiercer, while the moderates can only give ground. This leads to a vicious circle, and polarization intensifies.
US society is also under the influence of such divisions and antagonism. According to The Atlantic, US democracy is in trouble. The democratic recession cannot be more obvious today.
The Global Times, owned by the Chinese Communist Party, was happy to see political turmoil in the US. In an editorial, the newspaper wrote that political affairs in the US demonstrate the problems with the country’s political system, which are becoming more serious each day.
Undoubtedly, the impotence of the US House and the potential shutdown of the federal government have influenced the country’s ability to conduct foreign affairs. It has severely damaged the reputation and leadership of the US, as evidenced by the Republicans’ interference in approving urgent military aid to Ukraine and Israel.
To restore its system of governance, the US can only hope for and depend on democracy’s own mechanisms to repair itself and put things back on the right track. For voters in Taiwan, this is a valuable lesson. It is imperative to keep the legislature stable by maintaining a majority. Taiwanese should not let the Legislative Yuan become polarized. An intense antagonism between the ruling and the opposition parties must be avoided.
Chen Yung-chang is a company manager.
Translated by Emma Liu
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
The Hong Kong government on Monday gazetted sweeping amendments to the implementation rules of Article 43 of its National Security Law. There was no legislative debate, no public consultation and no transition period. By the time the ink dried on the gazette, the new powers were already in force. This move effectively bypassed Hong Kong’s Legislative Council. The rules were enacted by the Hong Kong chief executive, in conjunction with the Committee for Safeguarding National Security — a body shielded from judicial review and accountable only to Beijing. What is presented as “procedural refinement” is, in substance, a shift away from
Taiwan no longer wants to merely manufacture the chips that power artificial intelligence (AI). It aims to build the software, platforms and services that run on them. Ten major AI infrastructure projects, a national cloud computing center in Tainan, the sovereign language model Trustworthy AI Dialogue Engine, five targeted industry verticals — from precision medicine to smart agriculture — and the goal of ranking among the world’s top five in computing power by 2040: The roadmap from “Silicon Island” to “Smart Island” is drawn. The question is whether the western plains, where population, industry and farmland are concentrated, have the water and
The shifting geopolitical tectonic plates of this year have placed Beijing in a profound strategic dilemma. As Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) prepares for a high-stakes summit with US President Donald Trump, the traditional power dynamics of the China-Japan-US triangle have been destabilized by the diplomatic success of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi in Washington. For the Chinese leadership, the anxiety is two-fold: There is a visceral fear of being encircled by a hardened security alliance, and a secondary risk of being left in a vulnerable position by a transactional deal between Washington and Tokyo that might inadvertently empower Japan
RSS