The US House of Representatives last week authorized an impeachment inquiry into US President Joe Biden. The vote went strictly along party lines, with every Republican voting for it and every Democrat against. Clearly, the US House epitomizes the political divide in the country.
Today, the Republican Party and the Democratic Party are on par with one another, each supported equally by Americans. As a result, the US government has often become paralyzed due to a lack of collaboration between the parties. Worse, the House and the White House tend to hold each other back, leaving the entire government in limbo.
During the US midterm elections in November last year, the Republicans gained a narrow majority in the House. This was the starting point of the most recent political turbulence in the US. In January, Kevin McCarthy was elected House speaker after 15 rounds of voting. Nine months later, he was ousted. In exchange for being elected, McCarthy allegedly promised his right-wing colleagues an impeachment inquiry into Biden. It is believed that he revised regulations to make the impeachment procedure easier.
In September, McCarthy worked with the Democrats to pass a funding bill to avoid a government shutdown. Some Republicans were outraged by his move and planned to oust him from the speakership.
The polarization of the two parties resulted in a political quagmire in which the Republicans and the Democrats always oppose each other’s agendas. For example, even though McCarthy sought a bipartisan collaboration that would benefit the Biden administration, the Democrats still unanimously voted to oust him.
New US House Speaker Mike Johnson tried to suspend the impeachment inquiry into Biden, but faced great political pressure from fellow Republicans, who wanted to take revenge on the Democrats for twice impeaching former US president Donald Trump.
Without a majority in the US Congress, the extremists in each party often gain more power, and because of them, the legislative branch becomes paralyzed and left in limbo. When hardliners become more influential, they become even fiercer, while the moderates can only give ground. This leads to a vicious circle, and polarization intensifies.
US society is also under the influence of such divisions and antagonism. According to The Atlantic, US democracy is in trouble. The democratic recession cannot be more obvious today.
The Global Times, owned by the Chinese Communist Party, was happy to see political turmoil in the US. In an editorial, the newspaper wrote that political affairs in the US demonstrate the problems with the country’s political system, which are becoming more serious each day.
Undoubtedly, the impotence of the US House and the potential shutdown of the federal government have influenced the country’s ability to conduct foreign affairs. It has severely damaged the reputation and leadership of the US, as evidenced by the Republicans’ interference in approving urgent military aid to Ukraine and Israel.
To restore its system of governance, the US can only hope for and depend on democracy’s own mechanisms to repair itself and put things back on the right track. For voters in Taiwan, this is a valuable lesson. It is imperative to keep the legislature stable by maintaining a majority. Taiwanese should not let the Legislative Yuan become polarized. An intense antagonism between the ruling and the opposition parties must be avoided.
Chen Yung-chang is a company manager.
Translated by Emma Liu
Minister of Labor Hung Sun-han (洪申翰) on April 9 said that the first group of Indian workers could arrive as early as this year as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center in India and the India Taipei Association. Signed in February 2024, the MOU stipulates that Taipei would decide the number of migrant workers and which industries would employ them, while New Delhi would manage recruitment and training. Employment would be governed by the laws of both countries. Months after its signing, the two sides agreed that 1,000 migrant workers from India would
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
On March 31, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs released declassified diplomatic records from 1995 that drew wide domestic media attention. One revelation stood out: North Korea had once raised the possibility of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In a meeting with visiting Chinese officials in May 1995, as then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) prepared for a visit to South Korea, North Korean officials objected to Beijing’s growing ties with Seoul and raised Taiwan directly. According to the newly released records, North Korean officials asked why Pyongyang should refrain from developing relations with Taiwan while China and South Korea were expanding high-level
Japan’s imminent easing of arms export rules has sparked strong interest from Warsaw to Manila, Reuters reporting found, as US President Donald Trump wavers on security commitments to allies, and the wars in Iran and Ukraine strain US weapons supplies. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s ruling party approved the changes this week as she tries to invigorate the pacifist country’s military industrial base. Her government would formally adopt the new rules as soon as this month, three Japanese government officials told Reuters. Despite largely isolating itself from global arms markets since World War II, Japan spends enough on its own
RSS