The US House of Representatives last week authorized an impeachment inquiry into US President Joe Biden. The vote went strictly along party lines, with every Republican voting for it and every Democrat against. Clearly, the US House epitomizes the political divide in the country.
Today, the Republican Party and the Democratic Party are on par with one another, each supported equally by Americans. As a result, the US government has often become paralyzed due to a lack of collaboration between the parties. Worse, the House and the White House tend to hold each other back, leaving the entire government in limbo.
During the US midterm elections in November last year, the Republicans gained a narrow majority in the House. This was the starting point of the most recent political turbulence in the US. In January, Kevin McCarthy was elected House speaker after 15 rounds of voting. Nine months later, he was ousted. In exchange for being elected, McCarthy allegedly promised his right-wing colleagues an impeachment inquiry into Biden. It is believed that he revised regulations to make the impeachment procedure easier.
In September, McCarthy worked with the Democrats to pass a funding bill to avoid a government shutdown. Some Republicans were outraged by his move and planned to oust him from the speakership.
The polarization of the two parties resulted in a political quagmire in which the Republicans and the Democrats always oppose each other’s agendas. For example, even though McCarthy sought a bipartisan collaboration that would benefit the Biden administration, the Democrats still unanimously voted to oust him.
New US House Speaker Mike Johnson tried to suspend the impeachment inquiry into Biden, but faced great political pressure from fellow Republicans, who wanted to take revenge on the Democrats for twice impeaching former US president Donald Trump.
Without a majority in the US Congress, the extremists in each party often gain more power, and because of them, the legislative branch becomes paralyzed and left in limbo. When hardliners become more influential, they become even fiercer, while the moderates can only give ground. This leads to a vicious circle, and polarization intensifies.
US society is also under the influence of such divisions and antagonism. According to The Atlantic, US democracy is in trouble. The democratic recession cannot be more obvious today.
The Global Times, owned by the Chinese Communist Party, was happy to see political turmoil in the US. In an editorial, the newspaper wrote that political affairs in the US demonstrate the problems with the country’s political system, which are becoming more serious each day.
Undoubtedly, the impotence of the US House and the potential shutdown of the federal government have influenced the country’s ability to conduct foreign affairs. It has severely damaged the reputation and leadership of the US, as evidenced by the Republicans’ interference in approving urgent military aid to Ukraine and Israel.
To restore its system of governance, the US can only hope for and depend on democracy’s own mechanisms to repair itself and put things back on the right track. For voters in Taiwan, this is a valuable lesson. It is imperative to keep the legislature stable by maintaining a majority. Taiwanese should not let the Legislative Yuan become polarized. An intense antagonism between the ruling and the opposition parties must be avoided.
Chen Yung-chang is a company manager.
Translated by Emma Liu
A failure by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to respond to Israel’s brilliant 12-day (June 12-23) bombing and special operations war against Iran, topped by US President Donald Trump’s ordering the June 21 bombing of Iranian deep underground nuclear weapons fuel processing sites, has been noted by some as demonstrating a profound lack of resolve, even “impotence,” by China. However, this would be a dangerous underestimation of CCP ambitions and its broader and more profound military response to the Trump Administration — a challenge that includes an acceleration of its strategies to assist nuclear proxy states, and developing a wide array
Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), former chairman of Broadcasting Corp of China and leader of the “blue fighters,” recently announced that he had canned his trip to east Africa, and he would stay in Taiwan for the recall vote on Saturday. He added that he hoped “his friends in the blue camp would follow his lead.” His statement is quite interesting for a few reasons. Jaw had been criticized following media reports that he would be traveling in east Africa during the recall vote. While he decided to stay in Taiwan after drawing a lot of flak, his hesitation says it all: If
Twenty-four Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers are facing recall votes on Saturday, prompting nearly all KMT officials and lawmakers to rally their supporters over the past weekend, urging them to vote “no” in a bid to retain their seats and preserve the KMT’s majority in the Legislative Yuan. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which had largely kept its distance from the civic recall campaigns, earlier this month instructed its officials and staff to support the recall groups in a final push to protect the nation. The justification for the recalls has increasingly been framed as a “resistance” movement against China and
Much has been said about the significance of the recall vote, but here is what must be said clearly and without euphemism: This vote is not just about legislative misconduct. It is about defending Taiwan’s sovereignty against a “united front” campaign that has crept into the heart of our legislature. Taiwanese voters on Jan. 13 last year made a complex decision. Many supported William Lai (賴清德) for president to keep Taiwan strong on the world stage. At the same time, some hoped that giving the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) a legislative majority would offer a
RSS