One of the lesser discussed aspects of the week-long truce between Israel and Hamas, which collapsed at the beginning of this month, was the country that made it possible: not the US, nor the EU, but Qatar. Even though the ceasefire faltered and the Israeli military has resumed its devastating attack on Gaza, the negotiations helped cement Qatar’s role as a global mediator. Why Qatar — and what do its rulers really want?
A tiny emirate in the Persian Gulf that is rich in natural gas, Qatar seems an unlikely center for high-stakes geopolitical negotiations. Yet the country’s leaders have built a muscular foreign policy based on keeping channels open between enemies.
In the past few years, Qatar has hosted peace negotiations between the US and Taliban leaders, and indirect talks that led to a prisoner exchange between Iran and Washington. Just this week, it was reported that Qatar had distributed billions of dollars in aid to people in Gaza over the past decade, with the tacit approval of the Israeli government.
The Israel-Hamas negotiations are the highest stakes undertaken by Qatar’s leaders, but they have also exposed Qatar to new potential dangers. Since Hamas’ brutal attacks on Oct. 7, Republicans and other right-wing politicians in the US and Israel have stepped up their attacks on Qatar for hosting the group’s leadership in the capital, Doha, framing the issue as an example of the emirate supporting terrorism.
US Senator Mike Lee, a Republican from Utah, wrote on X, formerly Twitter, that “Qatar has blood on its hands” and demanded that US President Joe Biden’s administration force the Qataris to “arrest Hamas leaders and seize their assets.”
Qatari officials insist that they decided to host Hamas’ political leaders and open an office for them in Doha in 2012 only after the administration of former US president Barack Obama asked Qatar to establish an indirect channel that would allow Washington to communicate with Hamas.
“The presence of the Hamas office shouldn’t be confused with endorsement,” Qatari Ambassador to the US Sheikh Meshal bin Hamad Al Thani wrote in an opinion essay in the Wall Street Journal in October.
The threats do not stop in Washington. Even as Israeli negotiators were in Doha trying to hammer out further swaps to extend the truce with Hamas, other Israeli officials were threatening Qatar.
One senior foreign ministry official told Israeli Army Radio that Israel would “settle accounts” with the emirate once the war in Gaza was over. As if to reinforce that threat, Israeli airstrikes destroyed a Qatari-funded housing complex in Gaza on Dec. 2, as Israeli negotiators were leaving Doha the day after the truce collapsed.
The Biden administration is also succumbing to domestic US pressure, signaling that it plans to revisit the future of Hamas’ presence in Qatar once the hostage crisis is resolved.
It would be a mistake to force Hamas leaders out of Qatar. They would probably go to Iran, Lebanon or Syria — and Israel, the US and Europe would have a harder time negotiating with them indirectly. The Hamas leaders who settled in Qatar in 2012, including Khaled Meshaal, the head of Hamas’ political bureau at the time, and his deputy, Moussa Abu Marzouk, had been forced out of Damascus after Hamas refused to wholeheartedly support Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s regime early in the Syrian civil war.
So if hosting Hamas is such a double-edged sword, why does Qatar persist? Qatar’s ruling family, and especially the 43-year-old emir, Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, have tried to position the tiny emirate as a force in global geopolitics as both a matter of prestige and a way to survive in the midst of powerful neighbors.
Since the 2003 US invasion of Iraq unleashed regional turmoil, the ruling family has sought to pursue an independent foreign policy, using its enormous natural gas wealth to increase its influence. That has set the country on a collision course with two powerful neighbors and fellow Sunni Arab monarchies, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The Saudi Arabians, in particular, were disdainful of their tiny neighbor’s attempt to set its own foreign policy and not follow Riyadh’s lead.
When the US decided to move its military operations out of Saudi Arabia before the invasion of Iraq, Qatar offered use of its Al Udeid Air Base outside Doha. Since then, Qatar has invested US$8 billion in the base, which has grown into the largest US military installation in the Middle East, housing 8,000 troops and a hub for drone strikes across the region.
The breaking point between Qatar and its powerful neighbors came after the Arab uprisings of 2011, when popular protests forced out dictators across the region, and leaders of Saudi Arabia and the UAE worried about internal revolts threatening their rule. Saudi Arabia was enraged by Qatar’s support for the revolutions in Tunisia, Libya and especially Egypt, where Qatar became a primary backer of the Muslim Brotherhood. Saudi Arabia and UAE leaders saw Qatar throwing its lot in with Islamist groups who they viewed as the greatest threat to their monarchical rule in decades.
Tension between these US allies simmered until June 2017, when Saudi Arabia and the UAE, along with Bahrain and Egypt, cut diplomatic and economic relations with Qatar. With support from then-US president Donald Trump and his administration, the four countries also imposed a land, sea and air blockade, accusing Qatar of financing terrorism by supporting the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas, and undermining Sunni Arab efforts to isolate Iran.
The crisis upended trade across the Persian Gulf, and disrupted the lives of thousands of people.
However, Qatar survived the blockade, partly by becoming more dependent on Iran, Turkey and other regional powers opposed to the Saudi Arabian-UAE alliance. Qatar also doubled down on its regional outreach as a mediator.
Saudi Arabia finally agreed to lift the blockade in January 2021, but tensions remain over Doha’s support for Hamas and other Islamist groups, as well as the Qatar-based al-Jazeera’s coverage of its neighbors.
While Biden has been more supportive toward Qatar than Trump, he might well insist that the Qataris expel Hamas in the coming months, even if that ultimately hampers diplomacy and longer-term US interests. It would not be the first time. In September, Doha played a key role in negotiating a prisoner swap between the US and Iran, in exchange for unblocking US$6 billion in frozen Iranian oil funds.
However, after an uproar in the US Congress following the Oct. 7 attacks, the Biden administration pressured Qatar to suspend the agreement with Iran. That decision infuriated Tehran and weakened Qatar’s reputation as a reliable broker.
Qatar is basking in the international attention it won by negotiating a complex deal between Israel and Hamas. That attention could quickly turn into a political crisis if US and Israeli officials once again shift international focus on Hamas’ presence in Qatar — and turn the emirate’s effective diplomacy into a liability.
Mohamad Bazzi is director of the Hagop Kevorkian Center for Near Eastern Studies, and a professor of journalism at New York University.
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused