Since Beijing launched a boycott of the Golden Horse Awards in 2018, China has not participated in the Taiwanese film awards.
However, this year, unlike in the past few years, multiple Chinese-themed films — featuring the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as women’s and labor issues — were nominated.
Despite difficulties, some Chinese filmmakers, actors and crews still visited Taiwan late last month to take part in the awards ceremony. On the Internet, many Chinese seem to believe that Taiwan is the only place that gives respect to Chinese-language films and cherishes film talent.
There is no right or wrong in art. To quote Taiwanese director Ang Lee (李安): “Art is art. I don’t want any politics to interfere with the Golden Horse Awards, and I hope that everyone will respect this and give respect to filmmakers as well.”
Looking back at China’s film and television creation over the past few years, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has imposed constant restrictions.
The highly criticized 34th Golden Rooster Awards in China in 2021 serve as an example, and the sorrow that many Chinese expressed online was understandable.
All six films nominated that year for Best Feature Film except Sister (我的姐姐) were “tributes” to the 100th anniversary of the founding of the CCP. Even the “little pink” CCP supporters asked: “Were they nominated to fill the vacancies because there were no good movies?”
The Golden Horse Awards, the Golden Rooster Awards and the Hong Kong Film Awards recognize the creations of Chinese-language filmmakers. For example, at the 60th Golden Horse Awards this year, the slate of outstanding nominees caused much discussion on major Chinese Web sites.
Although Beijing has not yet lifted its boycott of the awards, I believe that more filmmakers from all sides will participate in the event next year.
When walking under the sun, people cast a shadow, but when they are not afraid of the shadow, their works shine.
Liy Wu is a journalist.
Translated by Eddy Chang
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission
RSS